Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 NPCA Board Resolution. 2 September 2006 – PPSI Meeting State and Local governments requested a decision from NPCA at its March 2007 Board meeting State.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 NPCA Board Resolution. 2 September 2006 – PPSI Meeting State and Local governments requested a decision from NPCA at its March 2007 Board meeting State."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 NPCA Board Resolution

2 2 September 2006 – PPSI Meeting State and Local governments requested a decision from NPCA at its March 2007 Board meeting State and Local governments requested a decision from NPCA at its March 2007 Board meeting Will the industry help finance a national post consumer paint management system? Will the industry help finance a national post consumer paint management system?

3 3 NPCA Board Resolution As per the government request – on March 21, 2007 – NPCA Board approved the “resolution” As per the government request – on March 21, 2007 – NPCA Board approved the “resolution” However, NPCA was able to reach consensus by acknowledging there are “important considerations that must be addressed in a definitive way…” However, NPCA was able to reach consensus by acknowledging there are “important considerations that must be addressed in a definitive way…” These concerns can be summarized under the headings of These concerns can be summarized under the headings of Funding Funding Roles of industry/government Roles of industry/government Role of recycling. Role of recycling.

4 4 Important Considerations Consumer education must be a cornerstone of the system, to reduce the volume of leftover paint and the cost of its management Consumer education must be a cornerstone of the system, to reduce the volume of leftover paint and the cost of its management Collecting or recycling latex paint in rural areas is not cost-effective Collecting or recycling latex paint in rural areas is not cost-effective Collecting or recycling latex paint in cans less than one-third full is also not cost-effective Collecting or recycling latex paint in cans less than one-third full is also not cost-effective Oil-based paint should be collected for disposal (due to its ignitability) Oil-based paint should be collected for disposal (due to its ignitability)

5 5 Important Considerations (cont.) No mandatory “take back” at retail locations – although retailers and manufacturers may take back product voluntarily No mandatory “take back” at retail locations – although retailers and manufacturers may take back product voluntarily Industry expects to partner with government to share the cost and responsibility of managing post-consumer paint Industry expects to partner with government to share the cost and responsibility of managing post-consumer paint Where available, existing government collection infrastructure should be utilized Where available, existing government collection infrastructure should be utilized Where non-existent, industry may need to subsidize a new collection system (e.g., such as the “Product Care” system in British Columbia) Where non-existent, industry may need to subsidize a new collection system (e.g., such as the “Product Care” system in British Columbia)

6 6 Important Considerations (cont.) Paint collection and management must be as cost-effective as possible Paint collection and management must be as cost-effective as possible Costs should be fair, transparent to the consumer, and collected at retail Costs should be fair, transparent to the consumer, and collected at retail An industry-run organization is needed to collect and allocate funds with full accountability An industry-run organization is needed to collect and allocate funds with full accountability

7 7 Pilot A pilot project is needed to work out details of system, including: A pilot project is needed to work out details of system, including: Project funding Project funding Scope dependent Scope dependent Retailer activities Retailer activities Industry/Government Roles Industry/Government Roles Build on current collection Build on current collection Disposal options Disposal options Role of Recycling Role of Recycling Existing facilities Existing facilities Viability of expansion Viability of expansion

8 8MOU Seek NPCA Board approval July 2007 Goals/Objectives: Continue PPSI dialogue Continue PPSI dialogue Pursue the development of a nationally coordinated system Pursue the development of a nationally coordinated system Undertake a pilot project to work through critical issues and gather information Undertake a pilot project to work through critical issues and gather information

9 9 MOU Work Agreements for Pilot Project: Timeframe – 24 months (6 months to plan/develop, 12 months to execute, and six months to review results/ramp up for national promotion) Timeframe – 24 months (6 months to plan/develop, 12 months to execute, and six months to review results/ramp up for national promotion) Location Location Defined roles/responsibilities Defined roles/responsibilities Program funding Program funding Role of recycling Role of recycling Goals/measurements Goals/measurements

10 10 MOU Limitations: Voluntary Voluntary NPCA to sign on behalf of industry NPCA to sign on behalf of industryAppendix: Pilot Project details Pilot Project details


Download ppt "1 NPCA Board Resolution. 2 September 2006 – PPSI Meeting State and Local governments requested a decision from NPCA at its March 2007 Board meeting State."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google