1. 94/9 requires an EC Type examination certificate Annex III Certificate and a QA-Notification (production audit Annex IV/VI/VII) Manufacturers need for this an EU Notified Body (Annex XI) Compliance with ATEX, LVD, EMC,... allows manufacturers to declare: Present Situation for Ex Products of Category 1/2 electrical / Category 1 non-electrical

2. Present Tendency in Industry engineering of chemical factories for global application (package unit strategy) global trade of products (one product line) makes more profit safety is enhanced by using one system (Zone classification) and one installation, maintenance, repair code

3. Question: Is free trade of 94/9 products in a global scale possible? WTO rules require the stepwise abolishment of TBT one option: bilateral MRAs for Standards/Certification Bodies bilateral MRA strategy needs too much administrative resources more efficient: a global certification scheme matching the ATEX requirements with a multilateral approach

4. IECEx Certification Scheme key elements IEC/TC31 standards (IEC 60079-0 foll.) as scope Accreditation procedures in accordance with ILAC requirements plus specific Ex Technical Guidance Documents List of recognized technical experts with Ex test experience, one of this group must be member of the audit team (‘peer assessment’) IECEx Certificate of Conformity: A. Product Assessment B. Production audit with an Ex expert in the audit team

5. In the near future electrical apparatus are 100% IEC by Parallel Voting Procedure CLC/IEC Additional marking required by 94/9 is addressed in the Foreword CLC to cover Annex II and X Cross reference lists are available - just to be maintained after new standard edition, to be published on the ATEX-Homepage To keep control and compliance of IEC documents with ESHRs: CLC/TC31 stops technical work and sends European experts to IEC/TC31/SCs/MTs Is IECEx a 100% match of the 94/9-requirements? Standards

6. Accreditation: to use ISO/IEC 17025 is a missing requirement in EU Annex XI seems not to be ‘State of the Art’ IECEx and its assessment rules are perfectly in line with ILAC (see cooperation and joint assessments) Accreditation in accordance with international rules should be preferred compared with a “Notification” Is IECEx a 100% match of the 94/9-requirements? Accreditation

7. the -declaration is not giving evidence of the expiration of the QA Notification users often complain IECEx Certificate of Conformity will provide a link to the QA-Notification/QAR My conclusion: IECEx requires more than 94/9, it is a 100% match Is IECEx a 100% match of the 94/9-requirements? Certificate

8. Standing Committee forms a WG IECEx/EU to evaluate IECEx Rules in order to get an overview about potential non-conformances with 94/9 in detail Target 06/2003 non-conformances to be presented in IECEx WG 1 - 06/OCT/2003 in Budapest, revision proposals to be created Revision of the rules presented on ExMC meeting 08/OCT/2003 New Version IECEx02 March 2004 How to proceed?

9. WG IECEx/EU creates an multilateral agreement draft between IECEx and EU -only 100% IEC Standard application (NBs still can apply other documents or own test requirements) -only those IECEx-CBs are recognized in EU which are located in a country having signed a reziproke agreement with IECEx How to proceed?