Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Hydrographic Services Review Panel October 2010 David Fox Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife Marine Resources Program Use of seafloor mapping data in.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Hydrographic Services Review Panel October 2010 David Fox Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife Marine Resources Program Use of seafloor mapping data in."— Presentation transcript:

1 Hydrographic Services Review Panel October 2010 David Fox Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife Marine Resources Program Use of seafloor mapping data in management of nearshore biological resources

2 Outline of Presentation Program overview Fish population monitoring and assessment Fishery research Marine reserve evaluation Groundtruthing On-going data needs

3 Program Overview Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Marine Resources Program -Natural resource management (primarily fisheries management) -Research and monitoring -Public information and education -Direct jurisdiction in state’s territorial sea and estuaries -Partnership role in resource management in federal waters

4 Nearshore Habitat-Based Fish Monitoring and Assessment Habitat area x fish density = fish abundance Three basic type of information (all depend on high resolution seafloor mapping data) 1) Inventory of habitats 2) Measure of fish density 3) Fish habitat associations

5 Seafloor Habitat Inventory Bathymetry Seafloor habitat interpretation Derived products – bathymetric position index

6 30 x 100 m 4 x 8 km ~1.5 x 2 m ROV Surveys to Measure Fish Density

7 Low Relief High Relief % Cover = 29.1% Density = 34.5/ha % Cover = 12.3% Density = 21.3/ha % Cover = 23.1% Density = 28.4/ha Fish-Habitat Associations Using derived descriptors of reef physical morphology

8 Fish – Patch Area Relationships 30m x 100m 20m x 250m 5m x 8m 10m x 40m

9 (m 2 ) log-transformed density (#/100m 2 ) Fish-Habitat Associations: Habitat Patch Size

10 Canary Rockfish observations from ROV survey of Siletz Reef Complex (Lincoln City, OR) Depth (m) s (Depth) Generalized Additive Model: # Canary Rockfish ~ (Depth + Slope + Aspect + Rugosity + Bathymetric Position Index) Distance to Reef Crest (m) s (Distance to Reef Crest ) Prediction of fish “probability of occurrence” at unsampled locations Habitat-based stock assessments Fish-Habitat Relationships

11 Siletz Reef, Oregon Acoustic Receiver Grid (circles represent 500 m radius around each receiver) TOTAL= 35 receivers 16 km Rockfish Acoustic Tagging Project

12 Site Fidelity Yelloweye 207 97-100 76-96 51-75 10-50 1-9 <1 % Hits by Receiver Days n=91 Detections n=20794

13 Site Fidelity Canary 20 97-100 76-96 51-75 10-50 1-9 <1 % Hits by Receiver Days n=44 Detections n=610

14 Marine Reserve Site Evaluation DepthRockMixedSandTotal 0-25 m0.80.542.944.1 25-55 m0.118.236.955.2 > 55 m Total:0.918.779.899.3 DepthRockMixedSandTotal 0-25 m0.8%0.5%43.2%44.4% 25-55 m0.1%18.3%37.2%55.6% > 55 m Total:0.9%18.8%80.3%100.0% Habitat areas in km 2 Percent habitat areas

15 Groundtruthing Groundtruthing backscatter images with ROV transects

16 On-Going Seafloor Mapping Needs Management Needs Marine spatial planning Fish Stock assessment Nearshore monitoring Marine reserve monitoring Ocean development siting and impact assessment Seafloor Mapping Needs Continue filling the gaps in state territorial sea mapping Map the very-nearshore (0-10 m water depth) Estuary bathymetry and habitat mapping Full coverage multibeam bathymetry and backscatter, interpretive products, groundtruthed, web-based product delivery


Download ppt "Hydrographic Services Review Panel October 2010 David Fox Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife Marine Resources Program Use of seafloor mapping data in."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google