Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Siemens Phase II: Using the IT Audit as a Springboard for Continuous Controls Monitoring Ryan Teeter, Ph.D. Student, Rutgers University Rod Brennan, Director.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Siemens Phase II: Using the IT Audit as a Springboard for Continuous Controls Monitoring Ryan Teeter, Ph.D. Student, Rutgers University Rod Brennan, Director."— Presentation transcript:

1 Siemens Phase II: Using the IT Audit as a Springboard for Continuous Controls Monitoring Ryan Teeter, Ph.D. Student, Rutgers University Rod Brennan, Director of IT Audit, Siemens Corporation

2 Implementation of CCM at Siemens PLM Rules were created in Approva BizRights based on ~300 audit action sheets provided by Siemens Siemens Corporation wants universally-adaptable sets of rules and control tests for use in different divisions

3 Successes Initially approximately 63% of controls automated Rules were used to provide support for the IT audit Initial evaluation of cost savings (A&D PL specific) 1 : o For 3 of every 4 years, eliminate ~ 500 man-hours of IT GCC and application control testing (@ $137/hr = $68,750/year) o With system certified, 80% reduction in 500 man-hours of annual external IT audit hours (@ ~$200/hr, $80,000/year) 1 Siemens IT audit pool billing rate is $137/hour; Approx $200/hr Big 4 blended rate.

4 Successes ModuleTotal Controls Authoriza tions Controls Percent Automated (%) Business Process Controls Percent Automated (%) Overall Percent Automated (%) Basis System (BC)10420100%8444%55% Financial Accounting (FI)558100%4751%58% Asset Accounting (AA)264100%2264%69% Sales and Distribution (SD)215100%1650%62% Materials Management (MM)328100%2454%66% Project System (PS)329100%2370%78% Human Resources (HR)14 100%N/A 100% Total28468100%21652%63%

5 Challenges Audit priority o Non-applicable rules ignored because of time constraints CCM platform issues o Bugs or unimplemented features o Identified when comparing automated with manual results o Vendor vs. auditor priorities o Issues addressed in future releases Properly functioning controls o Control failure resulted in lack of support for the audit

6 Conclusion The IT audit is a feasible starting point for CCM implementation o Existing audit plan o Knowledge of experienced auditors o Real-time performance comparison 63% of audit controls automated o 100% of authorizations, which comprise 30-35% of audit commitment o vs. 75% proposed by Alles et al. (2007)


Download ppt "Siemens Phase II: Using the IT Audit as a Springboard for Continuous Controls Monitoring Ryan Teeter, Ph.D. Student, Rutgers University Rod Brennan, Director."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google