Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Hebert JS, Lewicke J. Case report of modified Box and Blocks test with motion capture.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Hebert JS, Lewicke J. Case report of modified Box and Blocks test with motion capture."— Presentation transcript:

1 This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Hebert JS, Lewicke J. Case report of modified Box and Blocks test with motion capture to measure prosthetic function. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(8):1163–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0207 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0207JSP Case report of modified Box and Blocks test with motion capture to measure prosthetic function Jacqueline S. Hebert, MD, FRCPC; Justin Lewicke, MBA, BSc(Kin)

2 This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Hebert JS, Lewicke J. Case report of modified Box and Blocks test with motion capture to measure prosthetic function. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(8):1163–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0207 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0207JSP Aim – Quantify compensatory movement and simultaneous control in subject using different prostheses before and after targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) surgery. Relevance – Upper-limb prosthetic designs and treatment interventions are expanding faster than ability to measure their effectiveness. – Box and Blocks test is commonly used to measure manual dexterity, but has not been validated with upper-limb prosthetic users, or used in combination with motion analysis to look at quality of motion.

3 This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Hebert JS, Lewicke J. Case report of modified Box and Blocks test with motion capture to measure prosthetic function. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(8):1163–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0207 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0207JSP Method Single case study. Data were collected: – Pre-TMR surgery with body-powered prosthesis. – 6 mo after being fitted with TMR myoelectric prosthesis. Box and Blocks test was modified for cyclical motion within motion capture laboratory.

4 This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Hebert JS, Lewicke J. Case report of modified Box and Blocks test with motion capture to measure prosthetic function. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(8):1163–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0207 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0207JSP Results With TMR myoelectric prosthesis: – Subject could simultaneously activate hand and elbow. – Slower task performance. – Improved elbow flexion. – Less trunk compensatory motion.

5 This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Hebert JS, Lewicke J. Case report of modified Box and Blocks test with motion capture to measure prosthetic function. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(8):1163–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0207 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0207JSP Conclusion Report presents a potential method to quantify quality of motion and compensatory movements of prosthetic users. With further study, this test procedure could be a useful outcome measure for future standardized assessments of upper-limb prosthetic function.


Download ppt "This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Hebert JS, Lewicke J. Case report of modified Box and Blocks test with motion capture."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google