Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBasil Garrison Modified over 8 years ago
1
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Hebert JS, Lewicke J, Williams TR, Vette AH. Normative data for modified Box and Blocks test measuring upper-limb function via motion capture. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(6):XX–XX. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2013.10.0228 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2013.10.0228JSP Normative data for modified Box and Blocks test measuring upper-limb function via motion capture Jacqueline S. Hebert, MD, FRCPC; Justin Lewicke, MBA, BSc; Thomas R. Williams, PhD, Peng; Albert H. Vette, PhD
2
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Hebert JS, Lewicke J, Williams TR, Vette AH. Normative data for modified Box and Blocks test measuring upper-limb function via motion capture. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(6):XX–XX. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2013.10.0228 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2013.10.0228JSP Aim – Establish normative kinematics for modified Box and Blocks test by collecting data on nondisabled participants. Relevance – Motion analysis is an important tool for examining upper-limb function.
3
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Hebert JS, Lewicke J, Williams TR, Vette AH. Normative data for modified Box and Blocks test measuring upper-limb function via motion capture. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(6):XX–XX. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2013.10.0228 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2013.10.0228JSP Method Analyzed 4 motions of modified Box and Blocks test to establish kinematic data for upper-limb and trunk function. – n = 16 nondisabled participants. – Repeated test for right and left arms in seated and standing positions. – Compared data using nonparametric Friedman test.
4
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Hebert JS, Lewicke J, Williams TR, Vette AH. Normative data for modified Box and Blocks test measuring upper-limb function via motion capture. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(6):XX–XX. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2013.10.0228 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2013.10.0228JSP Results No differences between right- and left-hand performance other than for work completion time. Small but significance differences for standing and seated performance. – Slightly greater ranges in standing for axial trunk rotation, medial-lateral sternum displacement, and anterior-posterior hand displacement. Very consistent kinematic trajectories.
5
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Hebert JS, Lewicke J, Williams TR, Vette AH. Normative data for modified Box and Blocks test measuring upper-limb function via motion capture. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(6):XX–XX. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2013.10.0228 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2013.10.0228JSP Conclusion Consistency in nondisabled data suggests that normative kinematic trajectories can be defined for this task. Motion capture procedure may: – Add to understanding of movement in upper-limb impairment. – Be useful for measuring effect of interventions to improve upper-limb function.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.