Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCathleen O’Brien’ Modified over 9 years ago
1
Lindsey Saunders, RN,BSN April 7, 2014 NURS 7940 ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AND QUALITY OF CARE
2
BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE A decreased quality of life is common in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often due to misunderstandings about atrial fibrillation, symptoms and treatment management. Education is of great importance in this population and has been shown to produce a greater quality of life.
3
Pico Question: “What is the effectiveness of patient specific education in relation to the overall patient outcomes in the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation in patients 18 years and older?” PICO
4
Databases searched included CINAHL, Medline, and Academic Search Premier. 5 quantitative studies were found including 2 Systematic Reviews, a Meta-analysis, and 2 RCTs. A Prospective cohort study, Case Control Study, a Retrospective cohort study and a Current Opinion article were used. A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American Heart Association was also used. SEARCH STRATEGY
5
The recommendations from the evidence researched have great implications on how we educate and practice and have been shown effective in increasing quality of life. Grade A Providing education based on the patient’s current understanding of the disease and personal beliefs Providing education tailored to each patient and their current treatment plan Grade B Providing continuous support to patients Practicing effective communication SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE
6
Setting: Outpatient Cardiovascular Treatment Center at Baptist Medical Center South Participants: Men and women at least 18 years old with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation at an outpatient treatment center. SMALL TEST OF CHANGE GenderN% Male660 Female440 RaceN% White660 Black440
7
Implementation Steps: Informed consent was obtained Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy of life (AFEQT) questionnaire was administered to each participant to assess their current quality of life. AFEQT measures the patient’s perception of symptoms, functional impairment, treatment concerns and satisfaction using a likert scale: 1-7 (1= not bothered or limited; 7= extremely bothered or limited). Education was tailored and provided for each participant using The American Heart Association’s “Living with Atrial Fibrillation” brochure. SMALL TEST OF CHANGE
8
Evaluation Follow up phone calls were made after 1 month of receiving the education. Participants were given AFEQT questionnaire during 1 month follow up. The pre and post education AFEQT questionnaires were compared to assess for a greater quality of life. Lower scores = greater quality of life SMALL TEST OF CHANGE
9
Results Providing patient specific education to patients with atrial fibrillation was shown to significantly increase the quality of life in 4 categories after a 4-6 week follow up. Symptom Management (p= 0.001) Activity Restriction (p= 0.001) Medication Management (p= 0.000) Treatment Satisfaction (p= 0.007) SMALL TEST OF CHANGE
10
Patient’s opinion on how education improved their quality of life: SMALL TEST OF CHANGE
11
A greater level of education tailored to each patient has been shown to promote a better understanding of the disorder and treatments which will lead to a increased quality of life. Continually assessing the patient’s quality of life and providing specific education for each patient is essential in providing effective care and management to patients in a Nurse-led Atrial Fibrillation Management Clinic. More emphasis should be placed on providing adequate and detailed education to each patient in daily practices. CONCLUSION
12
American Heart Association, Atrial Fibrillation. (2012). Treatment & Prevention of AF. Retrieved from: http://www.heart.org/ HEARTORG/Conditions/Arrhythmia/AboutArrhythmia/Atrial- Fibrillation-AF-or-AFib_UCM_302027_Article.jsp Berti, D., Hendriks, J., Brandes, A., Deaton, C., Crijns, H., Camm, A.J., Hindriks, G.,Moons, P., Heidbuchel, H. (2013). A proposal for interdisciplinary, nurse-coordinated atrial fibrillation expert program as a way to structure daily practice. European Heart Journal 34, 2725-2730. Doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht096. Camm, A., Lip, G., Caterina, R., Savelieva, I., Atar, D., Hohnloser, S.,… Kirchhof, P. (2012). 2012 focused update of the esc guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Eurospace, 14, 1385-1413. Doi:10.1093/eurospace/eus305x Goli, N.M., Thompson, T., Sears, S.F., Mounsey, J.P., Chung, E., Shwartz, J.,…Gehi, A.K. (2012). Educational attainment is associated with atrial fibrillation symptom severity. PACE, 35, 1090-1096. Hendriks, J., Nieuwlaat, R., Vrijhoef, H., Wit, R., Crijns, H., Tieleman, R.G. (2010). Improving adherence guidelines in the treatment of atrial fibrillation by implementing an integrated chronic care program. Netherlands Heart Journal 18 (10), 471-477. Hendriks, J., Wit, R., Crijns, H., Vrijhoef, H., Prins, M., Pisters, R., Pison, L., Blaauw, Y., Tieleman, R.G. (2012). Nurse-led care vs. usual care for patients with atrial fibrillation: results of a randomized trial of integrated chronic care vs. routine clinical care in ambulatory patients with atrial fibrillation. European Heart Journal 33, 269.2699.Doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs071 Schector, S.R. & Lynch, J. (2011). Health learning and adult education: in search of theory of practice. Adult Education Quarterly, 6(3), 207-224. Spertus,J., Dorian, P., Bubien, R., Lewis, S., Godejohn, D., Reynolds, M.R., Lakkireddy, D.R. (2011). Development of the atrial fibrillation effect of quality of life (AFEQT) questionnaire in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 4, 15-25. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.110.958033 Zolnierek, K.B. & DiMatteo, M.R. (2009). Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Medcare, 47(8), 826-834. Doi:10.1097/MLR.06013e31819a5acc REFERENCES
13
QUESTIONS?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.