1. Team 2: Zachary Stewart, Brian Moore, Noah Hanahan, Becca Poling

2. Kite Research  Research Most Common Designs  Most Important: Application, Altitude, Stability  Least Important: Aesthetics

3. Brainstorming Ideas Application or Task: Successfully fly with one or more signal lights attached. Desired ObjectivesUse for a TaskSuitable for TaskHelps Manage ResourcesTecnology FeasiblePossible CostSafetyWeight Factors Use for a Task 0101130.214285714 Suitable for Task1 100120.142857143 Helps Manage Resources00 00000 Tecnology Feasible111 1150.357142857 Possible Cost0110 130.214285714 Safety00100 10.071428571 Comparison/CriteriaWeight FactorsBoxDeltaSledParachute Use for Task0.2142857141.285714286 Suitable for Task0.1428571430.7142857140.4285714290.5714285710.857142857 Helps Manage Resources00000 Technology Feasible0.3571428571.0714285710.7142857141.7857142861.428571429 Possible Cost0.2142857140.4285714290.751.071428571 Safety0.0714285710.2857142860.3571428570.2857142860.428571429 Total13.7857142863.53571428655.071428571 Task: flashlight signal Final Concept: Parachute

4. Prototype Phase  Paper prototype was not sufficient  Not very stable

5. Final Product  Plans A-E were not sufficient  We decided a different idea…

6. Flying and Testing  When flying, the kite was successful at times.  However, the kite still lacked stability  Ran line to add stability

7. Final Remarks  Pros of Design: Flew, Accomplished Task of Signal  Cons: Would have liked to have more stability  Block Flow-  http://www.personal.psu.edu/zts5064/Zachar y/teamwebsite.htm http://www.personal.psu.edu/zts5064/Zachar y/teamwebsite.htm