Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

RockSat-C 2012 PDR Team Name Preliminary Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "RockSat-C 2012 PDR Team Name Preliminary Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1."— Presentation transcript:

1 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Team Name Preliminary Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1

2 RockSat-C 2012 PDR User Notes You can reformat this to fit your design, but be sure to cover at least the information requested on the following slides This template contains all of the information you are required to convey at the PDR level. If you have questions, please don’t hesitate to contact me directly: rocksatprogram@gmail.com 720-314-3552 2

3 RockSat-C 2012 PDR User Notes This template is based on an example mission to show the level of detail needed for your “preliminary design” 3

4 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Purpose of PDR Confirm that: –Science objectives and required system performance have been translated into verifiable requirements –Payload Design: to specifications from requirements, can be met through proposed design (trade studies) –Project risks have been identified, and mitigation plans exist –Project management plan is adequate to meet schedule and budget –Project is at a level to proceed to prototyping of high risk items 4 gnurf.net

5 RockSat-C 2012 PDR PDR Presentation Content 5 Section 1: Mission Overview –Mission Overview –Organizational Chart –Theory and Concepts –Concept of Operations –Expected Results Section 2: System Overview –Subsystem Definitions –Critical Interfaces (ICDs?) –System Level Block Diagram –System/Project Level Requirement Verification Plan –User Guide Compliance –Sharing Logistics

6 RockSat-C 2012 PDR PDR Presentation Contents Section 3: Subsystem Design –Subsystem A (SSA) (i.e. EPS) SSA Block Diagram SSA Key Trade Studies (1 – 2?) Subsystem Risk Matrix/Mitigation –Subsystem B (SSB) (i.e. STR) SSA Block Diagram SSA Key Trade Studies (1 – 2?) Subsystem Risk Matrix/Mitigation –Etc., Etc… 6 jessicaswanson.com

7 RockSat-C 2012 PDR PDR Presentation Contents Section 4: Prototyping Plan –Item “A” to be Prototyped –Item “B” to be Prototyped –Etc., Etc… Section 5: Project Management Plan –User’s Guide Compliance, Sharing –Org Chart –Schedule –Work Breakdown Structure –Budget 7

8 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Mission Overview Name of Presenter 8

9 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Mission Overview Mission statement Break mission statement down into your overall mission requirements What do you expect to discover or prove? Who will this benefit/what will your data be used for? 9

10 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Theory and Concepts Give a brief overview of the underlying science concepts and theory What other research has been performed in the past? –Results? 10

11 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Concept of Operations Based on science objectives, diagram of what the payload will be doing during flight, highlights areas of interest Example on following slide 11

12 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Example ConOps t ≈ 1.3 min Altitude: 75 km Event A Occurs t ≈ 15 min Splash Down t ≈ 1.7 min Altitude: 95 km Event B Occurs -G switch triggered -All systems on -Begin data collection t = 0 min t ≈ 4.0 min Altitude: 95 km Event C Occurs Apogee t ≈ 2.8 min Altitude: ≈115 km End of Orion Burn t ≈ 0.6 min Altitude: 52 km t ≈ 4.5 min Altitude: 75 km Event D Occurs Altitude t ≈ 5.5 min Chute Deploys

13 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Expected Results 13 This is vital in showing you understand the science concepts Go over what you expect to find –Ex. What wavelengths do you expect to see? How many particles do you expect to measure? How well do you expect the spin stabilizer to work (settling time?)? How many counts of radiation? etc

14 RockSat-C 2012 PDR System Overview Name of Presenter 14

15 RockSat-C 2012 PDR System Level Block Diagram 15 Buck Converter Boost Converter uController WFF Power Interface WFF Telem. Interface Motor Controller EPS DEP PM Photomultiplier STR Wallops PT Interfaces Low Voltage High Voltage Data/ Control Legend Show a full system of your subsystems, and the connections between them

16 RockSat-C 2012 PDR System Design – Physical Model 16 MEPO Board AVR Board G-Switch Battery Accelerometer Detector WFF Door Piece Mounting Flange

17 RockSat-C 2012 PDR That was a BAD PHYSICAL MODEL! Why? Because you must have DIMENSIONS and UNITS! Remember, this is a preliminary design, so the design doesn’t have to be perfect or final –But still have labels, dimensions, and units 17

18 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Design in Canister (preliminary) 18 Where are the dimensions?!

19 RockSat-C 2012 PDR System Concept of Operations Here, include a diagram and a step by step of your data collection process, or major activities happening in your payload –If you are collecting data, show/discuss when the data will be available, how it’s collected, and where it gets sent –If you have moving parts, be sure to include a simplified timeline of how things are happening along with the data collection This slide must be included 19

20 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Critical Interfaces 20 At the PDR level you should at minimum identify critical interfaces. The following is an example of types of interfaces you might have, and how the interface between two systems might be designed Interface NameBrief DescriptionPotential Solution EPS/STR The electrical power system boards will need to mount to the RockSat-X deck to fix them rigidly to the launch vehicle. The connection should be sufficient to survive 20Gs in the thrust axis and 10 Gs in the lateral axes. Buckling is a key failure mode. Heritage shows that stainless steel or aluminum stand-offs work well. Sizes and numbers required will be determined by CDR. PM/STR The photomultiplier will need to mount to the RockSat-X deck rigidly. The connection should be sufficient to survive 20Gs in the thrust axis and 10 Gs in the lateral axes. Most likely, the PM will hang, and the supports will be in tension. A spring and damper support will need to be developed. The system should decrease the overall amplitude of vibration no less than 50%. DEP/STR The deployment mechanism must rigidly connect to the RockSat-X deck. The actuator has pre-drilled and tapped 8-32 mounts. 8-32 cap head screws will mount the deployment mechanism to the plate. The screws will come through the bottom of the plate to mate with the DEP system. DEP/EPS The deployment mechanism has a standard, male RS-232 DB-9 connector to interface to a motor controller (male), which is provided with the DEP mechanism. The motor controller will be controlled by EPS. A standard, serial cable with female DB-9 connector on both ends will connect the motor controller to the DEP mechanism. The motor controller to EPS system interface is yet to be determined. PM/EPS The photomultiplier requires 800V DC and outputs pulses at TTL levels. The PM also requires a ground connection. A TBD 2 pin power connector (insulated) will connect the EPS board to the PM. A separate, TBD connector will transmit the pulse train to the asynchronous line at a TBD Baud rate.

21 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Requirement Verification At the PDR level, highlight the most critical project/system requirements and determine how you will VERIFY these requirements –This starts the process of test planning Verification: did you build the thing right? –Validation: did you build the right thing – we won’t focus too much on validation, because it is more of a customer consideration 21

22 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Requirement Verification Example Table 22 Requirement Verification Method Description They deploable boom shall deploy to a height of no more than 12” DemonstrationBoom will be expanded to full length in the upright position to verify it doesn’t exceed 12” The boom shall extend to the full 12” height in less than 5 seconds from a horizontal position. AnalysisThe system’s dynamical characteristics will be derived from SolidWorks, and available torques will yield minimum response time. The full system shall fit on a single RockSat-X deck InspectionVisual inspection will verify this requirement The sytem shall survive the vibration characteristics prescribed by the RockSat- X program. TestThe system will be subjected to these vibration loads in June during testing week.

23 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Why do we care about requirements? At this point, I will be checking to make sure you have a good set of requirements to define your project This comic is an entertaining, but accurate, depiction of what can happen with a project that is not well defined, managed, and documented 23 http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2005/03/on-software-engineering.html

24 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Subsystem Design Name of Subsystem *You will have several subsystems* Name of Presenter 24

25 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Subsystem Design Section This section is where you explain how each subsystem was designed Discuss how you researched components that would meet your requirements –Show trade studies if necessary, and if you show them, be prepared to explain the scoring and categories The most important part is explaining how you reached your major design decisions in each subsystem After explaining components, discuss any risks associated with this subsystem 25

26 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Subsystem Overview – Block Diagram Show your subsystems, now with more detail inside the boxes, and the connections between them 26

27 RockSat-C 2012 PDR EPS: Block Diagram 27 Show the subsystem block diagram with primary component choices highlighted. Power Data/ Control Legend

28 RockSat-C 2012 PDR EPS: Trade Studies 28 Show rationale for you choices in components. You basically weigh your options against your requirements and what each component can offer. Don’t forget things like: availability, cost, and prior knowledge. I recommend an online search for examples if you are unsure, or contact me. µController XMegaATMega 32 L Cost 810 Availability 10 Clock Speed 105 A/D Converters 95 Programming Language 88 Average: 97.6 You should have completed a trade study for each block, but you only need to present the 2-3 most important. Numbers are relatively subjective, but 10 should represent a perfect fit, 5 will work, but is not desirable, and 0 does NOT meet expectations. The component with the highest average should drive your choice for design.

29 RockSat-C 2012 PDR EPS: Risk Matrix 29 Consequence EPS.RSK.1 EPS.RSK.3 EPS.RSK.4 EPS.RSK.2 Possibility EPS.RSK.1: Mission objectives aren’t met IF microcontroller fails in-flight EPS.RSK.2: Mission objectives aren’t met IF a suitable motor controller cannot be procured EPS.RSK.3: The EPS system can’t survive launch conditions, and the mission objectives aren’t met EPS.RSK.4: A strain will be put on the power budget IF flying monkeys delay the launch by an hour Risks for the subsystem under discussion should be documented here The horizontal represents the likelihood of a risk, the vertical is the corresponding consequence. Risks placement should help drive mitigation priority

30 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Writing Risks – a note When you write a risk, you are writing about the bad thing that might result, NOT the cause –Ex: “Risk 1: There might be one+ month delay in obtaining our science instrument” – not quite. This is the cause. The RISK is what this might do to your project, like delay testing, integration, schedule, etc, so you could write “Risk 1: The integration schedule will slip due to delays in procuring the science instrument” 30

31 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Prototyping Plan Name of Presenter 31

32 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Prototyping Section The purpose of this section is to help you identify what components/connections might need testing before you can say with confidence that you want something in your final design Not everything must be prototyped (you don’t have time) Prototypes are usually used to address risks 32

33 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Prototyping Plan 33 Concern about mounting the PM to the deck has been expressed (Risk: jeopardize the mission objectives) STR PM DEP EPS Concerns about testing the PM on the ground have been expressed Mounting the probe to the end of the boom will present a significant challenge The functionality of the microcontoller board needs to be verified by CDR Prototype this interface and verify the fit with the PM Develop a test plan and verify it with LASP mentors Mount a test probe and verify structural rigidity Prototype the micro board on a bread board to verify functionality Risk/ConcernAction What will you build/test between now and CDR to mitigate risks?

34 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Project Management Plan Name of Presenter 34

35 RockSat-C 2012 PDR RockSat-C 2012 User’s Guide Compliance 35 Rough Order of Magnitude mass estimate –Initial masses of major components, sensors, structural pieces –Start thinking about BALLAST CG – predicted CG based on your design Are you using high voltage –How are the schematics/safety coming along? Are you using any ports? How will you interface with them? Are you sharing an atmospheric port? – you may not know some of these at this time, which is fine

36 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Sharing Logistics – if applicable 36 If known: Who are you sharing with? –Summary of your partner’s mission (1 line) Plan for collaboration –How do you communicate? –How will you share designs (solidworks, any actual fit checks before next June)? Structural interface – will you be joining with standoffs or something else (again, be wary of clearance)? grandpmr.com

37 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Organizational Chart Please turn your organization from CoDR into an official chart What subsystems do you have? Who works on each subsystem? –Leads? Don’t forget faculty advisor/sponsor(s) 37 Project Manager Shawn Carroll System Engineer Emily Logan CFO Shawn Carroll Faculty Advisor Chris Koehler Sponsor LASP Faculty Advisory Riley Pack Safety Engineer Chris Koehler Testing Lead Jessica Brown EPS David Ferguson Riley Pack STR Tyler Murphy Aaron Russert DEP Aaron Russert Shawn Carroll PM Kirstyn Johnson Elliott Richerson

38 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Schedule 38 What are the major milestones for your project? (i.e. when will things be prototyped?) CDR When will you begin procuring hardware? Start thinking all the way to the end of the project! Rough integration and testing schedule in the spring Etc, etc, etc Format: Gant charts Excel spreadsheet Simple list Whatever works for you! Don’t let the schedule sneak up on you! schedule

39 RockSat-C 2012 PDR WBS 39 Present a very top-level work break down schedule One can look up the tree for large scope goals One can look down the tree for dependencies Help each subsystem “see” the path ahead Based on the schedule and requirements PMPEPSSTRPMDEP Obtain PM from LASP EEF Proposal for funding … Trade Studies Schematics Schematic Review ICDs First Revision of Boards … Trade Studies Order Materials Work Request Into Shop … Obtain PM from LASP EEF Proposal for funding … Obtain PM from LASP EEF Proposal for funding …

40 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Budget 40 Present a very top-level budget (not nut and bolt level) A simple Excel spreadsheet will do Most important factor is LEAD TIME Simply to ensure that at this preliminary stage you aren’t over budget It is suggested that you add in at least a 25% margin at this point Margin:0.25Budget:$1,300.00Last Update:9/30/2010 11:50 ExampleSat ItemSupplierEstimated, Specific CostNumber RequiredToal CostNotes Motor ControllerDigiKey$150.002$300.001 for testing PMLASP$0.001 LASP mentor deserves shirt MicrocontrollerDigiKey$18.003$54.003 board revs Printed Circuit BoardsAdvanced Circuits$33.003$99.003 board revs Misc. Electronics (R,L,C)DigiKey$80.003$240.003 board revs Boom Materialonlinemetals.com$40.002$80.001 test article ProbeLASP$0.001 Testing Materials???$200.001 Estimated cost to test system Total (no margin):$973.00 Total (w/ margin):$1,216.25

41 RockSat-C 2012 PDR Summarize your main action items to get done before CDR Issues, concerns, any questions Conclusion 41


Download ppt "RockSat-C 2012 PDR Team Name Preliminary Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google