Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Reduction of Road-Generated Stream Suspended Sediment by a Riparian Buffer — case study from northern Thailand Alan Ziegler University of Hawaii (UHM)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Reduction of Road-Generated Stream Suspended Sediment by a Riparian Buffer — case study from northern Thailand Alan Ziegler University of Hawaii (UHM)"— Presentation transcript:

1 Reduction of Road-Generated Stream Suspended Sediment by a Riparian Buffer — case study from northern Thailand Alan Ziegler University of Hawaii (UHM) Junjiro Negishi (National University Singapore) Roy Sidle (Kyoto University) Pornchai Preechapanya (MNRE, Thailand) Thomas Giambelluca, Ross Sutherland (UHM)

2 Field Site PKEW 1996 – pres Pang Khum Thailand 50 km NNW of Chiang Mai population 350+ MONTANE MAINLAND SE ASIA

3 1998 2000 2003 ? secondary regrowth ++ ROADS ===

4 Alter Hydrological function - Δ timing of storm runoff - water droughts/excesses PROBLEM WITH Accelerate erosion processes - elevate stream SSC - sedimentation downstream - associated ecological impacts

5 Question If managers in the most developed countries can not solve many of their road-related impacts, what can we expect to do in regions where resources are limited?

6 FIELD EXPERIMENT QUANTIFY the reduction in stream sediment by altering flow of road runoff through a wetland: i.e., NATURAL BUFFER Dominant species: Fimbristylis aphylla Zoll. ex Steud. (Cyperaceae) Period: Rainy season of 2002 (18 events) Site: 2.5-ha sub-basin in PKEW (PKEW Noi) Feature: 165-m road section draining into a 30-m riparian buffer

7 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PKEW elevation: 1100 - 1600 m rainfall: 1200+ mm y -1 LANDUSE 72% forest, secondary vegetation 27% agriculture 1% roads, paths, dwellings (Landuse 93 ha)

8 PKEW: Pang Khum Experimental Watershed DESIGN 2 TREATMENTS: (BUFFER & NO BUFFER) MEASUREMENTS: (RF, Q, SSC) PKEW NOI Zero-order basin Area = 2.5ha

9 EXPERIMENTAL SETUP 165-m road section & RO collection ditch Bypass through 30-m buffer Road RO > 50,000 mg/L Bypass exit Fimbristylisaphylla

10 FIELD DATA BUFFER (no pipe) 8 Events RF T = 1-31 mm SS T = <1–160 kg SSC T = 16-650 mg L -1 SSC max = 5-4000 mg L -1 ROAD SSC max = 6000 – 96000 mg L -1 NO BUFFER (pipe) 10 Events RF T = 1-23 mm SS T = 2–212 kg SSC T = 90-2300 mg L -1 SSC max = 200-7000 mg L -1 ROAD SSC max = 10000 – 50000 mg L -1

11 SEDIMENT RATING CURVES BUFFER NO BUFFER Baseflow C i = 28.329 Q i 0.882 {BUFFER} C i = 22.265 Q i 1.579 {NO BUFFER}

12 PRINCIPAL RESULT Reduction in STREAM SSC by the 30-m buffer 30-85% (storm-dependent) METHOD: used the BUFFER rating curve to re-calculate SSC at every logged Q for 10 NO BUFFER events [crude simulation] [index]

13 Specific Factors 1.Buffer infiltrability 2.Physical properties of the buffer 3.Antecedent soil moisture 4.Storm characteristics 5.Slope angle 6.Nature of the overland flow— SUOF versus COF CONCLUSION ? INEFFECTIVE ? Road RO > threshold flow  8 L s -1 RF = 90 mm h -1 ; < 4% annual RF total CASES: Steep slopes | ISSF | ++ RF Must limit road runoff volume (e.g., drains at 50 m intervals) 30-m buffer is effective for 100-150 m road sections

14 Direct evidence how natural buffers are affordable strategies for reducing sediment inputs to streams Limit slope angles Limit flow path distances Proper hillslope locations Resurfacing material Control traffic Routine maintenance Experience: should be combined with other recognized strategies: Reduce overland flow Reduce sediment availability

15 thanks Alan Ziegler | adz@hawaii.edu 2002 Posse: Junjiro Negishi (National University Singapore) Roy Sidle (Kyoto University) Pornchai Preechapanya (MNRE, Thailand) Thomas Giambelluca, Ross Sutherland (UHM)

16 Rainfall, discharge, and sediment variables for 18 monitored events

17 Index of buffer efficiency 1 Determined using Eq. 1 instead of Eq. 2 in the calculation of suspended sediment at each logged Q value during the storm. 2 ΔC s_event = (Ĉ s_event - C s_event )/ C s_event

18

19 Alteration of Hydrological Flowpaths

20

21 ROADS ? UPPER BASIN Interstorm Hysteresis in SSC 15:30 16:00 15:45 16:15 17:00 16:30 16:45 clockwise hysteresis 17:45 ROADS ?

22 We determined sediment concentrations by filtering samples (0.2-0.5 L) through pre-weighed, pre-ashed, 0.7-μm Whatman glass filters (Φ = 0.47mm) using a 60-psi vacuum pump and NALGENE™ polysulfone filter holders. After drying at 105  C for 24 h, we weighed the filters to determine the mass of total suspended material.


Download ppt "Reduction of Road-Generated Stream Suspended Sediment by a Riparian Buffer — case study from northern Thailand Alan Ziegler University of Hawaii (UHM)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google