Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 1 B-Physics at DØ Recent Results & Plans Hal Evans(for the DØ B group)Columbia U. 1.B-Physics & the DØ Detector.

Published byIsabel McKenzie Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 1 B-Physics at DØ Recent Results & Plans Hal Evans(for the DØ B group)Columbia U. 1.B-Physics & the DØ Detector."— Presentation transcript:

1 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 1 B-Physics at DØ Recent Results & Plans Hal Evans(for the DØ B group)Columbia U. 1.B-Physics & the DØ Detector 2.Recent B-Physics Results  Rare Decays  Lifetimes  Mixing 3.Planning for the Future

2 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 2 The Data Set Analyses Presented Here → ~470 pb -1 Coming Soon: 610 pb -1

3 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 3 DØ Detector (the cartoon) Central Scintillator Forward Mini- drift chamb’s Forward Scint Shielding Tracking: Solenoid(2T), Silicon,FiberTracker,Preshowers New Electronics,Trigger,DAQ Calorimeter Central PDTs

4 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 4 Tracking 2 T Magnetic Field  track reco to P T = 180 MeV Silicon: 2.7 – 9.5 cm (barrel)  6 barrels / 4 layers + disks  793K chan’s (most 2-sided)  Layer 0 this fall (r ~ 1.7 cm) Fiber Tracker: 20 – 51 cm  8 double layers: axial & stereo  77K channels Pre-Shower  scintillating strips  central & forward / axial & stereo Large Acceptance: |  | < 3 250 pb -1  ~ 60 MeV ~10  m ~55  m (P t = 1GeV)

5 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 5 Muons  = 2 P > 1.5 GeV P > 3.5 GeV Forward Muon Efficiency Trigger Counters Mini-Drift Tubes Efficiency Luminosity (x10 30 ) 100% 90% 100% 90%  Large Coverage|  | < 2  High Efficiency  High Purity>60% 1-  @ L1

6 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 6 Trigger Main B-Physics Triggers Single- and Di-Muon B s Mixing Data Set  ~67%Di-Muon  ~25%Single-Muon  ~8%other (  +jet) CAL c/f PS CFT SMT MU FPD L1Cal L1PS L1CTT L1Mu L1FPD L2Cal L2PS L2CTT L2STT L2Mu Global L2 Framework Detector Lumi Level 1Level 2 2.5 MHz2.5 kHz1 kHz Level 3 CalTrk 50 Hz Typical Rates (Hz) at L = 4  10 31 cm -2 s -1 TriggerL1L2L3 dimuon50154 single mu12010050 Total160080060 L3 limit ~ 50 Hz  prescale !

7 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 7 DØ B-Physics Results  Differential X-Section160 pb -1 PRL 94 (2005) B s → D s1 (2536)  v X485 pb -1 preliminary B c Semileptonic210 pb -1 preliminary B → D ** 250 pb -1 preliminary B ** 350 pb -1 preliminary X(3872)230 pb -1 PRL 93 (2004) D s →   and D - →   508 pb -1 preliminary B s →  +  -  300 pb -1 preliminary B s →  +  - 300 pb -1 preliminary 240 pb -1 PRL 94 (2005) B s  /  450 pb -1 preliminary B s → D s  X Lifetime400 pb -1 preliminary B + /B 0 Lifetime Ratio440 pb -1 PRL 94 (2005)  b → J/   Lifetime250 pb -1 PRL 94 (2005) B s → J/   Lifetime220 pb -1 PRL 94 (2005) B s Mixing using D s (  )  X and OST460 pb -1 preliminary B s → D s (K * K)  X Reconstruction200 pb -1 preliminary B d Mixing250 pb -1 preliminary

8 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 8 B’s Galore ! Modeevts / 100pb -1 J/    +  - 1.14 M B +  J/  K + 1700 B d  J/  K *0 740 B d  J/  K 0 S 40 B s  J/   100  b  J/   25 B c  J/   X65 X(3872)  J/   +  - 230 B  D **  v210 B **  B  150 B s  D s1  X4 B +  D 0  + X46.2 K B d  D* -  + X10 K B s  D s (  )  X2900 B s  D s (K * K)  X2500 B s → D s1 (2536)  v X 485 pb -1 Signal: 18.5 ± 5.5 (3.4  ) D s1 + → D *+ K S 0

9 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 9 FCNC Heavy Flavor Decays b d,sd,s u,c,t W W v ℓ+ℓ+ ℓ-ℓ- b d,sd,s W W Z ℓ+ℓ+ ℓ-ℓ- b d,sd,s W Z ℓ+ℓ+ ℓ-ℓ- Bs  W Z u,c,t ℓ+ℓ+ ℓ-ℓ- Bs  u,c,t W W Z ℓ+ℓ+ ℓ-ℓ- B s →  +  - B s →  +  -  SM BR = (3.4±1.5)  10 -9 Enhanced at large tan  (MSSM  tan 6  ) CDF-II: BR < 1.5  10 -7 SM BR ~ 1.6  10 -6 Smaller Enhance at large tan  CDF-I: BR < 6.7  10 -5 D + →  +  -  + SM BR ~ 1.0  10 -6 (dominated by long distance) Enhanced in e.g. RPV SUSY FOCUS: BR < 8.8  10 -6

10 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 10 B s →  +  - and  +  -  Preselection  vertexed  +  - P T  > 2.5 GeV, |  | < 2.0  pair of opp chrg tracks (  )  P T B > 5 GeV Final Selection Discriminants  Isolation of  +  - (  )  Pointing Angle:  (L vtx, P)  L xy Signif: L xy /  L xy Normalization Channels   +  - B + → J/  K +   +  -  B s → J/   Bs→+-Bs→+- Bs→+-Bs→+-  +  - Events closed 300 pb -1

11 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 11 Limits ChannelEff wrt Pre-SelN(bgrd)N(data)BR Limit (95% CL)SM Pred + -+ - 38.6%4.3 ± 1.243.7  10 -7 3.4  10 -9 + - + -  52%5.1 ± 1.0blind1.2  10 -5 (ave)1.6  10 -6 B s →  +  - Normalization B s →  +  -  Normalization N Bs = 74 ± 11 B s → J/  

12 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 12 D s + →  +  -  + and D + →  +  -  + Select D (s) Signal from  (  +  - )  cand’s w/ Likelihood  D Isolation: P T (D)/  P T (cone)  L xy Signif: S D = L xy /  L xy  Pointing Angle:  (L xy,P T )  Signif Ratio: S  (imp-par)/S D Signal (D s →  MC) Background (M D sidebands) L sig / (L sig + L bgd ) = d 508 pb -1 World Best Limit

13 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 13 Lifetime Roundup DØ Lifetime Measurements vs HFAG World Averages errors scaled x10 for display purposes World Best

14 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 14 B s → D s  v X Lifetime B s → D s (  )  v X Selection  no lifetime biasing cuts Unbinned logL Fit for  using  signal region  wrong- & right-sign sidebands ( to constrain bgrd PDFs)  f(signal) from Mass fit 300 pb -1 D - →   - 1300 ± 223 Signal Region 35955 evts D s - →   - 5153 ± 265 ± 450 Right Sign Sideband Wrong Sign Sideband  (Bs) = 1.420 ± 0.043 ± 0.057 ps World Best Measurement ! – HFAG ave now: 1.472 ± 0.045

15 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 15 B s Lifetime Difference B s → J/   (P → V V)  CP-Even:S,D waves  CP-Odd:P wave  relative contributions  CP states of B s Observed Distribution Transversity Angle Fit Þ  b/w M eigenstates Þ R  = |A  (0)| 2 z x y J/  Rest Frame K+K+ K-K- ++ --   x y  Rest Frame  J/  K+K+ K-K- Detector effects CP-Odd CP-Even

16 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 16 Fits to Data Data Set: 450 pb -1  9699 candidate events  483±32 B s → J/  (  +  - )  (K + K - )  Fit to: M(B s ), ct 0, cos   Free params  f sig,  ave, R ,  / , M(B s )  + resolution & bgrd params Fit Results

17 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 17 Comparing to the SM Flavor Specific Decays also constrain  /   Using PDG  (B s →D s lvX)  Assuming SM  CPV 

18 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 18 B s Mixing Analysis Data Selection  B s → D s -  + v X D s - →  (K + K - )  -  no explicit trigger required  some  -dependent cuts (effects ~cancel in Asym) Opposite Side (Muon) Tagger  Q(jet) containing muon  P T rel  Q(  )  Q(secondary vertex) Eff & Dilution from Data   = N tag /N tot = 5.1%  D = 2  - 1 = 44.8% (  = N correct /N tag ) D s →   13339 ± 277 460 pb -1 Untagged Tagged D - →   5019 ± 292 D s →   675 ± 43

19 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 19 Measure Tagging using B d and B +  D 0 X Sample (85% B + - 15% B d )  D *0 X Sample (85% B d - 15% B + ) uu 0.734 ± 0.015 dd 0.724 ± 0.021use in B s fits mdmd 0.558 ± 0.048 ps -1 (HFAG0.509 ± 0.004 ps -1 winter 05)

20 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 20 B s Results 460 pb -1 Asym vs VPDL DØ Prelim Result 95% CL:  m s > 5.0 ps -1 sensitivity: 4.6 ps -1 DØ Prelim Result 95% CL:  m s > 5.0 ps -1 sensitivity: 4.6 ps -1 Expected Limit Comparison

21 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 21 DØ Upgrades for High Luminosity Trigger (mainly L1)  allows viable trigger list as L > 2  10 32 L3 Bandwidth Upgrade  current limit for B-Physics triggers is at L3  proposal: add dedicated 50 Hz of output bandwidth Silicon Layer-0  integrated radiation dose  inner SMT layer dies  add new, rad hard Layer-0 at R = 1.7 cm  Impact Param: 55→35  m at 1 GeV Integrated Luminosity (fb -1 ) www.fnal.gov/directorate/DOE_TeVOps05_Review.html we are here 2  10 32 cm -2 s -1 2.9  10 32 cm -2 s -1 ~golf ball size ! dE/dx using SMT

22 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 22 Reach in B s Mixing In Review Now (for EPS 05)  add K * K mode  improved tagging (add electrons + more var’s) Toward 1 fb -1 semileptonic sens ~ 12 ps -1 with 1 fb -1s Further Down the Road cover ~full SM range (but need to establish hadronic modes)

23 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 23 Lifetime Futures B s Lifetime Projections ModeLumi (fb -1 )Stat (ps)Syst (ps)Tot (ps) D s  X0.40.0430.0570.071 4.00.0130.030.034 Ds Ds  4.00.040.010.04  /  Projections Lumi (fb -1 ) Error on  /  0.45 20.12 40.08 80.06 Theory0.12 ± 0.05 Assumes: Layer-0 + 3-angle Fit for  /  reduction coming soon 450 pb -1 DØ  fs &  / 

24 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 24 More Crystal Ball Gazing Most DØ B-Physics Results are Statistics Limited Rare Decays  reoptimize selections, F-B Asym’s, K S  +  -, K *  +  -, …  broaden charm FCNC analysis  /   3-angle fits, Separate Lifetimes for CP-state ( , D s (*) D s (*) )  Integrated CP asym in semileptonic,  s, … B s Mixing  more modes: K * K,3 ,K s K + B s → D s   better tagging: electrons, more variables  event-by-event likelihood fits (some) Others  B **, D**, D s1 : move from observation → measure properties  J/  &  Polarization and b cross-section  B c semileptonic and hadronic decays  make more use of neutral particles ( ,  0,  c →J/   …)  more decay modes

25 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 25 Conclusions (Beginnings ?) DØ Physics Program is Hitting its Stride  detector well-suited to many measurements Several World Best Results  D + →  +  -  + ; B s Lifetime Interesting New Results Just Around the Corner  improved  m s, rare decays, … for EPS 05 DØ Upgrades for High Lumi  Improve Performance  trigger, layer-0, L3 bandwidth upgrade Stay Tuned !

26 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 26 Backup Slides

27 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 27 Low P T Tracking

28 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 28 B →  +  - (  ) Final Discriminants B s →  +  - B s →  +  - 

29 H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 29 B s Mixing Details

Download ppt "H.Evans Tevatron Connection: 24-Jun-05 1 B-Physics at DØ Recent Results & Plans Hal Evans(for the DØ B group)Columbia U. 1.B-Physics & the DØ Detector."

Similar presentations

Oct 14, 2003Vivek Jain – BNL Beauty 2003 1 Recent Results from D0 Vivek Jain Brookhaven National Lab (D0 Collaboration) Beauty 2003.

Oct 14, 2003Vivek Jain – BNL Beauty Recent Results from D0 Vivek Jain Brookhaven National Lab (D0 Collaboration) Beauty 2003.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon 1 B s Mixing at CDF Seminar at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Gavril Giurgiu Carnegie Mellon University August 16,

Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon 1 B s Mixing at CDF Seminar at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Gavril Giurgiu Carnegie Mellon University August 16,
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …

The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty 2005 - Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.

Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
ICFP 2005, Taiwan Colin Gay, Yale University B Mixing and Lifetimes from CDF Colin Gay, Yale University for the CDF II Collaboration.

ICFP 2005, Taiwan Colin Gay, Yale University B Mixing and Lifetimes from CDF Colin Gay, Yale University for the CDF II Collaboration.
Search for B s oscillations at D  Constraining the CKM matrix Large uncertainty Precise measurement of V td  properly constrain the CKM matrix yield.

Search for B s oscillations at D  Constraining the CKM matrix Large uncertainty Precise measurement of V td  properly constrain the CKM matrix yield.
22 July 2005Mauro Donega HEP20051 B s lifetimes in hadronic decays at CDF Mauro Donegà Université de Genève on behalf of the CDF collaboration.

22 July 2005Mauro Donega HEP20051 B s lifetimes in hadronic decays at CDF Mauro Donegà Université de Genève on behalf of the CDF collaboration.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.

Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
1 B s  J/  update Lifetime Difference & Mixing phase Avdhesh Chandra for the CDF and DØ collaborations Beauty 2006 University of Oxford, UK.

1 B s  J/  update Lifetime Difference & Mixing phase Avdhesh Chandra for the CDF and DØ collaborations Beauty 2006 University of Oxford, UK.
1 Rare Decays At the Tevatron Cheng-Ju S. Lin (Fermilab ) BEAUTY 2006 OXFORD 28 September 2006.

1 Rare Decays At the Tevatron Cheng-Ju S. Lin (Fermilab ) BEAUTY 2006 OXFORD 28 September 2006.
BR = (14 +6 -5 (stat) ± 2(syst) ± 5 (BR))  10 -5 From PDG * From MC * BR(  needs to be rescaled for f s /f d From Data b->sss pure penguin amplitude.

BR = ( (stat) ± 2(syst) ± 5 (BR))  From PDG * From MC * BR(  needs to be rescaled for f s /f d From Data b->sss pure penguin amplitude.
Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B mixing at DØ WIN 2005 Delphi, Greece Chris Barnes, Imperial College.

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B mixing at DØ WIN 2005 Delphi, Greece Chris Barnes, Imperial College.
B Production and Decay at DØ Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3.

B Production and Decay at DØ Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3.
B physics: new states, rare decays and branching ratios in CDF Vyacheslav Krutelyov Texas A&M University For CDF Collaboration July 1, 2004 BEACH04 Chicago,

B physics: new states, rare decays and branching ratios in CDF Vyacheslav Krutelyov Texas A&M University For CDF Collaboration July 1, 2004 BEACH04 Chicago,
Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.

Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.
Luca Lista L.Lista INFN Sezione di Napoli Rare and Hadronic B decays in B A B AR.

Luca Lista L.Lista INFN Sezione di Napoli Rare and Hadronic B decays in B A B AR.
B S Mixing at Tevatron Donatella Lucchesi University and INFN of Padova On behalf of the CDF&D0 Collaborations First Workshop on Theory, Phenomenology.

B S Mixing at Tevatron Donatella Lucchesi University and INFN of Padova On behalf of the CDF&D0 Collaborations First Workshop on Theory, Phenomenology.
1 CDF Results on B Physics Masashi Tanaka (Argonne) The Tevatron Connection June 24th, 2005.

1 CDF Results on B Physics Masashi Tanaka (Argonne) The Tevatron Connection June 24th, 2005.
APS Meeting April 5-8, 2003 at Philadelphia Chunhui Luo 1 Chunhui Luo Inclusive J/ψ Production at DØ.

APS Meeting April 5-8, 2003 at Philadelphia Chunhui Luo 1 Chunhui Luo Inclusive J/ψ Production at DØ.
Workshop on Quarkonium, November 8-10, 2002 at CERN Heriberto Castilla DØ at Run IIa as the new B-Physics/charmonium player Heriberto Castilla Cinvestav-IPN.

Workshop on Quarkonium, November 8-10, 2002 at CERN Heriberto Castilla DØ at Run IIa as the new B-Physics/charmonium player Heriberto Castilla Cinvestav-IPN.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google