Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Current Data And Future Analysis Thomas Wieland, Thomas Schwarzmayr and Tim M Strom Helmholtz Zentrum München Institute of Human Genetics Geneva, 16/04/12.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Current Data And Future Analysis Thomas Wieland, Thomas Schwarzmayr and Tim M Strom Helmholtz Zentrum München Institute of Human Genetics Geneva, 16/04/12."— Presentation transcript:

1 Current Data And Future Analysis Thomas Wieland, Thomas Schwarzmayr and Tim M Strom Helmholtz Zentrum München Institute of Human Genetics Geneva, 16/04/12

2 Overview 1.Current Data – mRNA – miRNA – Imputation 2.Future Analysis – Variant Calling on mRNA Data

3 mRNA Our 48 samples have on average 55M reads 88% mapped (BWA; reads trimmed to 50bp) ~4% of aligned reads intersect lincRNA (from UCSC)

4 miRNA

5

6 31% (+- 13%) of reads overlapping with known miRNAs (UCSC)

7 Imputation info value: “a measure of the relative statistical information about the SNP allele frequency from the imputed data” (Marchini, J., & Howie, B. Nature reviews. Genetics, 2010)

8 Variant Calling on mRNA Data Illumina Pipeline Alignment BWAReference genome Variant calling SAMtools Variant filter SAMtools / custom Variant annotation UCSC gene tables dbSNP Database Candidate genes Linkage information Run statistics Inheritance model Base Quality Alignment Statistics Enrichment Statistics RefSeq genes lincRNA,miRNAs,...

9 Variant Calling on mRNA Data Variant calling SAMtools Variant filter SAMtools / custom Variant annotation UCSC gene tables dbSNP Database Candidate genes Linkage informationInheritance model RefSeq genes lincRNA,miRNAs,... pre-aligned mRNA files

10 Samples Case-Controls Homozygous-Heterozygous Type of variation SNV call quality dbSNP / HapMap Average heterozygozity

11 Exome database Genes Cases Controls Quality Annotation dbSNP HGMD 1000 genomes PolyPhen Prediction,...

12 Variant Calling on mRNA Data Possible analysis: mRNA calling vs. WG genotypes mRNA calling vs. Imputation RNA editing? Recent discussions about amount: “widespread” (M. Li et al., Science 333, 53, 2011) vs. “very few” (Schrider et al., Plos One, 2011) Can we find known sites from literature? (e.g. Li, J. B. et al. (2009). Genome-wide identification of human RNA editing sites by parallel DNA capturing and sequencing. Science, 324(5931), 1210-3. )


Download ppt "Current Data And Future Analysis Thomas Wieland, Thomas Schwarzmayr and Tim M Strom Helmholtz Zentrum München Institute of Human Genetics Geneva, 16/04/12."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google