1. Transitioning research to impact Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University / FCC

2. Paths to impact papersCERT, WSJ public policy open source standard s license to company start-up algorithmsXX(x) analysis of existing systems XXX system models X(x) protocols(X)XXXx systemsXXXXX architectureXX(x)?

3.  Public policy  keep technology honest  identify public interest challenges  inform public policy choices  Standards  new applications (e.g., data center, M2M)  improvement of existing protocols (BGP, security, TCP) Non-traditional routes to impact

4.  Impact  papers: more general wins  others: right time, well-defined problem  Time commitment  can’t just drop off an Internet Draft  can’t just public a paper in TPRC  Bean counting  may not increase your h-factor  Funding  novelty may be hard to identify for NSF proposal Challenges of non-traditional impact