1. CIC ILL Directors Meeting, October 22, 2015 That’s Just Gross: A Macro-style Look at CIC’s Collection Sharing Activity 2011-2015 Dennis Massie Program Officer, OCLC Research

2. What numbers of borrows and loans has each institution executed in each of the various resource sharing venues in the past 5 years? What factors determine the requesting method or model used for each request? How is all this changing over time? How will it most likely change in the future? OCLC/CIC ILL Study

3. What numbers of borrows and loans has each institution executed in each of the various resource sharing venues in the past 5 years? What factors determine the requesting method or model used for each request? How is all this changing over time? How will it most likely change in the future? OCLC/CIC ILL Study

4. What numbers of borrows and loans has each institution executed in each of the various resource sharing venues in the past 5 years? What factors determine the requesting method or model used for each request? How is all this changing over time? How will it most likely change in the future? OCLC/CIC ILL Study

5. THAT OTHER ILL DATA STUDY

6. #1:Total sharing activity is going up.

7. #2: Circ-to-Circ is where BD growth is.

8. #3. BD Growth is due to new players.

9. 9 APPARENTLY TREND-LIKE SUBSTANCES RELATING TO CIC COLLECTION-SHARING ACTIVITY

13. #9:Total sharing activity is going down.

16. #8:On OCLC, Sharing Ret’s up, Non’s down.

19. #7: RapidILL up & down, Docline down.

22. #6: Other Consortial Borrowing: Down-ish.

25. #5: Free online, POD of non-returnables up.

27. #4: International lending of Non-ret’s is big.

30. #3: Non-UBorrow CIC OCLC traffic down.

35. #2: UBorrow borrowing & lending patterns are very, very different.

37. 67%-33%

41. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb UBorrow Universe

42. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb UBorrow Universe

43. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb UBorrow Universe

44. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe

45. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe

46. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe

47. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated

48. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated

49. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated

50. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated

51. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated

52. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated

53. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated

54. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved

55. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated

56. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows

57. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg. 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows

58. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg: 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows 2015 avg: 6,555 lends, 3,024 borrows

59. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg: 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows 2015 avg: 6,555 lends, 3,024 borrows MI and NW 2015 avg: 6,179 lends, 14,895 borrows

60. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg: 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows 2015 avg: 6,555 lends, 3,024 borrows MI and NW 2015 avg: 6,179 lends, 14,895 borrows

61. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg: 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows 2015 avg: 6,555 lends, 3,024 borrows MI and NW 2015 avg: 6,179 lends, 14,895 borrows

62. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg: 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows 2015 avg: 6,555 lends, 3,024 borrows MI and NW 2015 avg: 6,179 lends, 14,895 borrows

63. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg: 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows 2015 avg: 6,555 lends, 3,024 borrows MI and NW 2015 avg: 6,179 lends, 14,895 borrows

64. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg: 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows 2015 avg: 6,555 lends, 3,024 borrows MI and NW 2015 avg: 6,179 lends, 14,895 borrows

65. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg: 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows 2015 avg: 6,555 lends, 3,024 borrows MI and NW 2015 avg: 6,179 lends, 14,895 borrows

66. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg: 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows 2015 avg: 6,555 lends, 3,024 borrows MI and NW 2015 avg: 6,179 lends, 14,895 borrows

67. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg: 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows 2015 avg: 6,555 lends, 3,024 borrows MI and NW 2015 avg: 6,179 lends, 14,895 borrows

68. Chi OSU IA Ind PSU NW MD MN MI MST Rut IL-U Pur WI Neb Net Lenders, UBorrow Mediated UBorrow Universe Net Borrowers, UBorrow Unmediated Net Lenders, UBorrow Unmediated Net Borrower, UBorrow Mediated Net Borrower, Evolved From Mediated to Unmediated 2015 avg: 6,489 lends, 3,405 borrows 2015 avg: 5,607 lends, 11,677 borrows 2015 avg: 6,555 lends, 3,024 borrows MI and NW 2015 avg: 6,179 lends, 14,895 borrows #1: Mediated or Unmediated as a predominant borrowing method within UBorrow seems to have no correlation with relative borrowing volume.

69. Interview each CIC ILL unit (or selected ones) Chart OCLC ILL interactions in detail as new members joined CIC Look at fill rates Isolate returnables and non-returnables Overlay other variables on sharing data Repeat study with the Go8? Report out Next steps/further study

70. SM Together we make breakthroughs possible. Thanks! Comments? Questions? Dennis Massie Program Officer, OCLC Research massied@oclc.org CIC ILL Directors Meeting