1. Leadership Team May 13, 2014

3. Abstracts from each Session

4. Plenary Sessions (see word doc for speaker detail)

5. Disruptive Thinking Bryan Sivak Luke Williams Innovation Chris Vein Sarah Miller Caldicott Lisa Bodell Marina Muzzacato Leadership/Change Management Simon Sinek Sydney Smith-Heimbrock Abby Wilson Business/Entrepreneurship Evan Burfield Mike Walsh Government/Regulation Cass Sunstein Elliott Branch Penny Pritzker Phyllis Schneck Suzanne Spaulding Clay Johnson Technology Clay Shirkey Mike Braken Data Transparency Nick Sinai Beth Novek Science Dr. James Garvin

7. Naming Conventions

8. 8 Goals -Not Disruptive but does not need to be exactly the same -Avoid legally protected terms Terms for Discussion -Ted Talk's -“Mission Challenge” or “Wicked Problems” or others -Name for the Innovation and Collaboration area -“Tuesday CXO Session”

9. Connection between MOC and ELC

10. 10 MOC will examine six different topics that will define the next generation of innovation and collaboration. Should Government Act as Its Own Systems Integrator? Open Data: What is in it for Us? Open, Flexible Government Implementing Continuous Diagnostics and Mitigation (CDM) Going Out on a Limb – Risk-taking, Innovation, and Failing Fast Is Agile Real in Federal IT? Should any of these connect to our Wicked Problems? Are there any other connections we should explore between MOC and ELC?

11. 11 Fellows Forum occurs immediately after MOC The theme is Successful Failure on a Political Stage - how to face and overcome project failures within the often political environment that we work in On Wednesday they will be soliciting project ideas and forming teams of the participants to take action on the ideas we’ve been incubating. They are asking these groups to identify and establish case studies within our agencies and compete with each other to report on their achievements at the 2014 Executive Leadership Conference. We are connecting with them in about 2 weeks after MOC. Do we want to manage expectations on how this will work? What would best serve ELC?

12. Current Mission Challenges / Wicked Problems

14. Involvement of the Partners

15. 15 Challenge: We need assistance with design facilitators to achieve the goal of meaningful ideation in a large group format Solution: Partners are a good fit because they are -sufficiently senior for this position -Conversant in the language and issues being discussed -The training provided will be a value add to the current partner program Next Steps: -Meet with Partners leadership to discuss vision for involvement and the level of training necessary/desired -Determining balance between training time before ELC and what we can ask them to do in ELC -Finalize approach and incorporate into program

16. Anything Else? Agenda Items for two weeks from now…