Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLaurel Opal Goodman Modified over 9 years ago
1
Title Presenter name Slideshow-URL Conference name Date
2
Slideshow URL…………….. Researcher bias Positive result bias 20 teams do studies, 1 publishes p<0.05 Poorly explained analyses DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
3
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747 85% of research resources are wasted! We must... favor... unbiased, transparent, collaborative research with greater standardization Share data, protocols, materials, software, other tools
4
Supported by gov policy: e.g. UK and NIH MetaboLights repository www.ebi.ac.uk/metabolights/ NIH Metabolomics Data Repository www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/data/index.php ISA-Tab for metadata http://www.isa-tools.org/format.html Data sharing
5
What about methods? http://reproducibility.cs.arizona.edu/ “The good news is that I was able to find some code. I am just hoping that it is a stable working version of the code... I have lost some data... The bad news is that the code is not commented and/or clean. So, I cannot really guarantee that you will enjoy playing with it.” 613 papers tested 123 successful reproductions
6
Problem There is a reproducibility crisis Published results are untrustworthy Research is a waste of government money (85%) What's the solution? Share data AND methods
7
Thanks or summary Slideshow URL
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.