Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byElfrieda Gibbs Modified over 8 years ago
1
19.7.2007 slide 1 Polar Ozone: Past and present Chapter 4 of WMO 2006 Ozone Assessment Summary Part 1 Polar stratospheric observations update Part 2 Progress in our understanding of physical and chemical processes Mark Weber 2007/07/19
2
19.7.2007 slide 2 Part 1 Polar stratospheric observations update
3
19.7.2007 slide 3 Executive Summary: Arctic observations Arctic spring total ozone over the last decade were lower than in the eighties
4
19.7.2007 slide 4 Executive Summary: Arctic observations Antthropogenic chemical loss and variability and transport are equally important for year-to-year Arctic ozone variability transport chemical loss
5
19.7.2007 slide 5 Executive Summary: Arctic observations Spring Arctic ozone is highly variable depending on dynamical conditions, variability in polar temperatures and ozone transport are dynamically driven Eddy heat flux is a measure of planetary wave activity
6
19.7.2007 slide 6 Executive Summary: Arctic observations Spring Arctic ozone is highly variable depending on dynamical conditions, variability in polar temperatures and ozone transport are dynamically driven Fig. 4-5, 4-1, 4-4
7
19.7.2007 slide 7 Executive Summary: Arctic observations For coldest Arctic winter, the volume of air with temperatures low enough for PSC formation has increased significantly since the 1960s
8
19.7.2007 slide 8 Executive Summary: Arctic observations Column ozone loss in Arctic winter 2004/05 was among the largest ever observed, with particular high losses below 18 km Observed chemical ozone loss from satellites (HALOE, ACE), ozone sondes, and groundbased DOAS (SAOZ)
9
19.7.2007 slide 9 Executive Summary: Arctic observations Column ozone loss in Arctic winter 2004/05 was among the largest ever observed, with particular high losses below 18 km Vortex averaged ozone loss from satellites (MLS, SAGE II, POAM III) and ozonesondes Note difference in altitudes of maximum loss from year-to-year (2000 vs. 2005)
10
19.7.2007 slide 10 Executive Summary: Antarctic observations Antarctic ozone depletion has stabilized during the last decade (1995- 2005) Explanations: Saturation of ozone loss (complete loss between 15 and 20 km altitudes) Higher levels of dynamical forcing (see 2002 ozone hole anomaly) <220 DU
11
19.7.2007 slide 11 Executive Summary: General Large inter-annual variability in polar stratospheric temperatures complicate the interpretation of trends
12
19.7.2007 slide 12 Part 2 Progress in our understanding of physical and chemical processes
13
19.7.2007 slide 13 Current understanding of physical and chemical processes Chlorine cycle: Chlorine activation on PSCs (<195 K) Photolysis rates of ClOOCl is highly uncertain (absorption cross-section) Uncertainty of the relative role of ClOOCl+M 2ClO+M (~10%, null cycle) vs. Reaction (1b) Bromine cycle BrO abundance is not dependent on PSC existence About half of the polar ozone loss may be due to the bromine cycle total inorganic bromine (Br y, source of BrO) is highly uncertain due to uncertainties in the very-short-lived (VSL) bromo-carbons entering the stratosphere loss cycle 1: loss cycle 2:
14
19.7.2007 slide 14 Chlorine cycle Best agreement with ClOx observations using photolysis rates (absorption cross-sections) from Burkholder et al. 1990 J 1b k 1a
15
19.7.2007 slide 15 Bromine cycle Measured BrO ( about 20 ppt) is higher than modelled assuming methyle bromide (CH3Br) and halons as primary source Contribution from VSLS? modelled BrO from CH3Br and halons BrO from ballon measurements
16
19.7.2007 slide 16 Bromine cycle (blue solid line) Modelled ClO x (blue solid line) in best agreement with observations (grey symbols) using Burkholder J 1a rates (ClOOCl photolysis) and measured BrO Contribution from bromine cycle to chemical loss is on the order of 30- 50% Arctic winter 1999/2000
17
19.7.2007 slide 17 Arctic O3 column loss and PSC volume Color: Observation from HALOE (circles) and ozone sondes (squares) Black: CTM model results using lower grid resolution (light) and higher grid resolution, improved denitrification/ sedimentation, and updated reaction rates (solid) Modelled polar ozone loss is in better agreement with observation/ measurements This linear relationship is an useful diagnostics for climate models
18
19.7.2007 slide 18 Summary Although the forcing of polar temperatures and vortex strength from planetary and gravity waves are well established, the causes of forcing variability (on dcadal scale) are still unknown Cold Arctic winters have gotten colder over four decades, the temperature change exceeds that expected from changes in greenhouse gases, the reason for this is still unknown BrO may play a larger role in polar ozone loss (up to 50%), but there is still large uncertainty in the polar bromine budget. The exact NAT nucleation mechanism in PSCs is still not completely understood, although progress has been made in parameterising denitrification in models.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.