1. Fighting Hunger Worldwide UKRAINE - Food and Nutrition Security Analysis VAM Unit UKCO

2. Fighting Hunger Worldwide Macro Economic Overview Ukraine is food surplus nation, food availability is not a concern in most of the country. However, household economic constraints related to the unrest continue to threaten food security in conflict- affected areas. Additionally, food prices are increasing at a time when household incomes are impacted by substantial unemployment and a reliance on savings. At the same time, the economy is undergoing a political and economic crisis resulting in the decline of GDP growth rates, decline of foreign investments, increase of government debt, and the significant devaluation of its national currency. http://vam.wfp.org/CountryPage_Indicators.aspx?iso3=UKR&p=ei

3. Fighting Hunger Worldwide Share of Income on Food

4. Fighting Hunger Worldwide Share of Income on Food http://ieconomics.com/food-inflation-highest

5. Fighting Hunger Worldwide High Food Prices

6. Fighting Hunger Worldwide High Food Prices

7. Fighting Hunger Worldwide Food Availability in NGCA

8. Fighting Hunger Worldwide Market Update Locations

9. Fighting Hunger Worldwide Food Security Eastern Ukraine “The overall food insecurity is comparable to the previous assessment (March 2015) in the Eastern Ukraine. Worth noting that the severity of food insecurity has moderated in the non-government controlled areas, which may be attributed to the humanitarian assistance provided by various agencies including WFP, as well as relatively calm civil security situation.” Food Security and Vulnerability Assessment - October 2015

10. Fighting Hunger Worldwide Food Insecurity levels in Eastern Ukraine Eastern Ukraine

11. Fighting Hunger Worldwide Food Consumption Score

12. Fighting Hunger Worldwide Food Consumption Score - Nutrition

13. Fighting Hunger Worldwide Percentage of HHs by consumption of Protein, Vit A and Hem iron rich foods

14. Fighting Hunger Worldwide Households’ access to food Around 65% of the respondents in both GCA and NGCA indicated complete loss or significant reduction of income. In average only 2.5% of the households in both GCA and NGCA expected the situation to improve. Lack of employment opportunities and high prices of food continue to significantly affect households’ ability to access food more so in NGCA.

15. Fighting Hunger Worldwide reduced Copying Strategies The most typical coping strategies include: rely on less preferred and/or less expensive food due to lack of food or money to buy food applied by 78% of households limit portion sizes applied by 47% and reduce the number of meals eaten in a day applied by 44%

16. Fighting Hunger Worldwide Who are the food-insecure people? 1.IDPs living in collective centers (around 35% found with severe and borderline FCS) 2.Women headed households and single women living alone particularly those adopting negative copying mechanism. Luhansk NGCA region seems to be much more affected in this regard. 3.Families with more children and children with different vulnerabilities/disabilities (invalids, orphans, etc.). 4.Elderly people 5.Unemployed and households with decreased levels of income 6.HHs with damaged houses 7.Additional factors of vulnerability are type of settlement – middle size cities.

17. Fighting Hunger Worldwide Population in need of Food Assistance

18. Fighting Hunger Worldwide Recommendations Targeting criteria: simplify the shift /changes in priorities. Some of the characteristics may be transitory (e.g. unemployed), while others are static (e.g. women headed household). There can be different response options such as: provide regular food assistance to the severely food insecure while for others (e.g. returnees/newly displaced) assist the population until their food security situation changes (e.g. start to receive the government social safety-nets, find job, etc. Support to undernutrition among children: Give priority and support families with more children among 0 – 24 months. Geographical Coverage: Luhansk seems much more affected and less covered by food security partners.

19. Fighting Hunger Worldwide Recommendations Choice of Modality: Encourage implementation of market based interventions also in NGCA (i.e. Luhansk NGCA) where markets are functional (mainly semi and urban settlements). Rural areas might still need to be supported through food in-kind. Consider Purchase For Progress (P4P): Local authorities have indicated need for provision of fresh vegetables and fruits to schools. Value of voucher/cash: Take into consideration increased prices of food and utilities in GCA especially during the winter period. Partners: Explore opportunity to extend cooperation among partners in food and nutrition security. Close coordination with others (expanding field movement; Using reports OCHA/RAF/ICRC/.

20. Fighting Hunger Worldwide Questions?