Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHope Pierce Modified over 9 years ago
1
1 Update on STELLA-LW Experiment Preparations W. D. Kimura Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Grant Nos. DE-FG02-04ER41294, DE-AC02-98CH10886, DE-FG03-92ER40695, and DE-FG02-92ER40745 ATF Users Meeting April 4-6, 2007
2
2 Collaborators -Nikolai Andreev (RAS)-Marcus Babzien (BNL) -Ilan Ben-Zvi (BNL)-David Cline (UCLA) -Simon Hooker (Oxford)-Karl Kusche (BNL) -Sergei Kuznetsov (RAS)-Igor Pavlishin (BNL) -Igor Pogorelsky (BNL)-Alla Pogosova (RAS) -Loren Steinhauer (UW)-Daniil Stolyarov -Antonio Ting (NRL) -Vitaly Yakimenko (BNL) -Xiaoping Ding (UCLA)-Arie Zigler (Hebrew University)
3
3 Synergism between STELLA-LW experiment and other experiments at BNL ATF has greatly benefited all experiments Wish to acknowledge contributions by: Resonant PWFA Experiment (University of Southern California) -Efthymios (Themos) Kallos -Patric Muggli -Tom Katsouleas PASER Experiment (Technion - Israel Institute of Technology) -Samer Banna Special Acknowledgements
4
4 Outline Background -Experiment goals as result of redirection -Modified experiment approach Update on experiment preparations -Gas-filled capillary -Coherent Thomson scattering diagnostic Future plans
5
5 Original STELLA-LW Goals STELLA-LW was to examine two new LWFA schemes 1 st Method: Seeded self-modulated LWFA (1) (seeded SM-LWFA) -Use seed e-beam bunch to generate wakefield -Laser pulse immediately follows to amplify wakefield -Probe amplified wakefield using second witness e-beam bunch [1] N. E. Andreev, et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 9, 031303 (2006).
6
6 Model Prediction for Seeded SM-LWFA Predictions (1) assume: Seed pulse length = 118 fs, Focus size = 50 m (1 ), 199 pC, Witness pulse length = 1.23 ps, Focus size = 20 m (1 ), Plasma density = 0.89 x 10 17 cm -3 ; Laser power = 0.5 TW, L acc = 2 mm Energy spectrum of witness [1]N. E. Andreev, et al., “Seeded Self-Modulated Laser Wakefield Acceleration,” Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 9, 031303 (2006).
7
7 Original STELLA-LW Goals STELLA-LW was to examine two new LWFA schemes 1 st Method: Seeded self-modulated LWFA (1) (seeded SM-LWFA) -Use seed e-beam bunch to generate wakefield -Laser pulse immediately follows to amplify wakefield -Probe amplified wakefield using second witness e-beam bunch [1] N. E. Andreev, et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 9, 031303 (2006). Both may permit more controllable wakefield formation, which would be important for staging LWFA 2 nd Method: Pseudo-resonant LWFA (2) (PR-LWFA) -Use nonlinear plasma interaction to steepen tail of laser pulse -Causes laser pulse to generate wakefield like shorter pulse [2] N. E. Andreev, et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 6, 041301 (2003).
8
8 STELLA-LW Experiment Forced to Conclude at End of 2007 DOE decided not renew STELLA-LW grant -Reviewers’ primary criticisms: not compelling work, progress too slow LBNL has demonstrated 1 GeV energy gain (>30 GeV/m) using LWFA -Used 3.3 cm gas-filled capillary at ~10 18 cm -3 to guide 40 TW laser beam -Small energy spread (2.5% rms), good charge (~30 pC) -Plan to stage process in near future STELLA-LW was to demonstrate 100 MeV gain (>1 GeV/m) using LWFA -Planned to use <1 cm gas-filled capillary at ~10 17 cm -3, where guiding is more difficult, and 1 TW laser beam -Would modulate e-beam energy, no trapping of electrons -Next phase would involve staging to create monoenergetic electrons -Would not happen for at least another 3 years Case of “Too little, too late”
9
9 STELLA-LW Will End by Performing Seeded SM-LWFA Experiment Only Would be first to demonstrate this new hybrid process -Must complete experiment by end of 2007 -No plans for follow-on experiments to seeded SM-LWFA STELLA team together with new collaborators are proposing entirely new experiments -Generation of Tunable Microbunch Train (presented tomorrow) -Advanced PASER Development (presented tomorrow) -Advanced Capillary Discharge Development (would involve ATF three years from now) Proposals are currently under review by DOE Psuedo-resonant LWFA experiment will not be pursued
10
10 Experimental Approach for Seeded SM-LWFA Must be Modified Seeded SM-LWFA experiment needs single ~100 fs seed bunch ATF chicane/dogleg system produces a pair of 100-fs bunches – no easy way to prevent this from occurring Can deliver single bunch by blocking second bunch, but this also blocks any witness bunch Will indirectly observe wakefield formation and amplification by using coherent Thomson scattering (CTS) diagnostic to detect anti-Stokes/Stokes sidebands on either side of fundamental laser line -Standard technique used by others (e.g., UCLA) -Wakefields act like traveling grating that scatters and shifts laser radiation -Sidebands at, corresponding to 9.6 m and 11.9 m
11
11 Coherent Thomson Scattering Diagnostic
12
12 Will Use Drive Laser Beam as CTS Probe Pros with using drive laser beam at 10.6 m as CTS probe: -Convenient because does not require second laser source and dichroic optics to permit using two different wavelengths -Sidebands automatically generated with no separate alignment needed of probe beam -CTS signal scales as L 2 – favors long wavelength -Have copious amounts of probe power available (~1 TW) Cons with using drive laser beam as probe: -Must be careful to completely filter-out fundamental signal -CTS signal strength and wakefield amplification both scale with drive laser beam power, but amplification should scale nonlinearly Will use N. Andreev’s model to help interpret CTS data
13
13 Model Prediction (3) for CTS Signal Using parameters from: N. E. Andreev, et al., “Seeded Self-Modulated Laser Wakefield Acceleration,” Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 9, 031303 (2006). [3] Courtesy: N. Andreev, RAS
14
14 Estimation of CTS Signal Strength Model predicts sideband signal is 10 3 to 10 4 times smaller than fundamental -Note, model assumed 0.5 TW and 2 mm long plasma length -Actual experiment will be delivering ~1 TW and using 4 mm long capillary -CTS signal strength should be stronger, but highly nonlinear so scaling may be faster than linear Sensitivity of IR detector limited by risetime and oscilloscope bandwidth (both ~1 ns) -Photovoltaic detectors have good detectivities D* with Noise-Equivalent- Power (NEP) of ~40 W -Even assuming worse case of I( )/I max ~ 10 -4 and 10 -3 reduction due to risetime limits, still have >10 kW available
15
15 Either Polypropylene or Gas-Filled Capillary Discharges Can be Used Earlier performed Stark broadening measurements on ablative polypropylene capillary -Trigger section = 2.3 mm, main discharge = 3.8 mm, ID = 1 mm -Measured ~10 17 cm -3 plasma densities Recently, performed Stark broadening measurements on gas-filled capillary -ID = 0.5 mm, length = 4 mm -Determined conditions necessary to achieve ~10 17 cm -3 plasma densities -Density does not appear to scale with gas pressure as expected, reason is still unclear
16
16 Polypropylene Capillary Discharge [4] D. Kaganovich, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 2925 (1997). Basic Zigler design [4] Entrance to capillary 6 mm for STELLA-LW
17
17 Gas-filled Capillary Discharge (4 & 10 mm)
18
18 STELLA-LW Capillary Chamber Drawing CO 2 laser beam E-beam Parabolic mirror w/ hole for e-beam Permanent magnetic focusing quadrupole Capillary discharge support system
19
19 Photo of Capillary Vacuum Chamber Vacuum Chamber
20
20 Schematic of STELLA-LW Experiment Layout on ATF Beamline #1
21
21 Performed DC breakdown measurements and compared with Paschen curve predictions for hydrogen gas - Used data to determine time required for gas to reach quasi-static condition inside capillary -Operate at minimum charge voltage to avoid operating in ablation mode Gas-Filled Capillary Update
22
22 Extensive Stark Broadening Measurements Performed on Gas-filled Capillary HH HH Typical spectrum from ionized gas only Typical spectrum when ablation is occurring
23
23 Gas-Filled Capillary Update (cont.) Performed vacuum recovery tests with gas-filled capillary installed on beamline -For 10 17 cm -3 densities, vacuum-load and recovery time appear to be acceptable -Still have remotely-insertable, 1- m-thick Ti foil pellicle available to separate linac from capillary Still need to determine whether laser beam further ionizes plasma -May be minor issue if discharge is near 100% ionized -Should be able to compensate for additional ionization by reducing gas reservoir pressure Initial tests of focusing TW CO 2 laser beam into 0.5-mm diameter capillary indicate excessive scraping of laser beam on capillary walls -Easiest solution is to use 1-mm diameter capillary -Less laser guiding expected, but less critical for short (4 mm) capillary
24
24 2nd Gas-Filled Capillary System Installed Second gas-filled capillary system fabricated and assembled -One system installed on beamline for interaction with e-beam -Second one installed in “FEL” room for interaction with TW CO 2 laser beam Different length gas-filled capillaries available -4 mm for seeded SM-LWFA -10 mm for double-bunch PWFA Arrangement permits performing capillary-based experiments in parallel -Capillary in FEL room will be used to test effects of laser beam on plasma and for preliminary testing of CTS diagnostic -Capillary on beamline will be used for double-bunch PWFA experiments, which are precursor to seeded SM-LWFA experiment -Once laser tests are completed in FEL room, can move CTS diagnostic to Experimental Hall and perform seeded SM-LWFA experiment
25
25 Near-Term Plans and Conclusion Near-term emphasis will be resolving issues related to focusing TW CO 2 laser beam into capillary and setting up CTS diagnostic -These are still nontrivial challenges -Actual seeded SM-LWFA experiment should begin in next few months Assuming one or more of new proposals are approved by ATF Review Committee and funded by DOE, then hope to transition from STELLA-LW to new experiment(s) in last quarter of 2007 -Same team members involved, including ATF staff -Much overlap with existing hardware and equipment Wish to thank ATF staff for outstanding support during past 20 years! -Experiment evolved from inverse Cerenkov acceleration to IFELs to laser wakefield acceleration -Looking forward to another 20…well, maybe…10 more years of working together!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.