1. 1 Reactor Neutrino White Paper Maury Goodman Maury Goodman Argonne National Lab May 2, 2003

2. Maury Goodman, White Paper for Reactor Workshop 2 Outline Discussions of Strategy again To Do List; including a White Paper

3. May 2, 2003Maury Goodman, White Paper for Reactor Workshop 3 Strategy for Reactor13 If  13 ≠0, we need more than one experiment due to degeneracies (CP, matter,  /4-  23, uncertainties,…) If  13 =0, we only need one experiment (next). Adam Para “That is arguable” 4/27/03

4. May 2, 2003Maury Goodman, White Paper for Reactor Workshop 4 Some political considerations  Orbach process  P5  Joint NUPAP/HEPAP snowmass?  US groups need to organize for funding even if we go abroad

5. May 2, 2003Maury Goodman, White Paper for Reactor Workshop 5 High-Energy Physics Facilities RecommendedFor The DOE Office of ScienceTwenty-Year Roadmap March 2003

6. May 2, 2003Maury Goodman, White Paper for Reactor Workshop 6 HEP Roadmap

7. May 2, 2003Maury Goodman, White Paper for Reactor Workshop 7 Off-axis schedule? (Blucher estimate)

8. May 2, 2003Maury Goodman, White Paper for Reactor Workshop 8  Snowmass?? ***!

9. May 2, 2003Maury Goodman, White Paper for Reactor Workshop 9 My view of the world Maury Goodman-30-April-2003 sin 2 2  13 ~ 0.02 An ambitious unambiguous reactor experiment costing ~$60M can and should be done first/early An off-axis experiment to exploit CP,… should be planned but will be “next generation” ~$150M plus beam improvements ~$150M That planning has started and needs to continue This is why I am working on both projects

10. May 2, 2003Maury Goodman, White Paper for Reactor Workshop 10 Warning If my view of the world is right, many beam experimenters will recognize it and jump-in or try to. I am an early manifestation of that. How big can/should such an experiment be? Will other US collaborations start? Forced marriages later?

11. May 2, 2003Maury Goodman, White Paper for Reactor Workshop 11 What cost to aim for? Perhaps this experiment will be better received at $60M than $40M. ] Direct comparison with off-axis at P5 ] Will still be faster/cheaper/smaller ] More exposure ] ??? Propose to SAGENAP and expect a head-to-head P5 comparison with off-axis

12. May 2, 2003Maury Goodman, White Paper for Reactor Workshop 12 White Paper (other than content) Important not to lose Momentum Can be used to increase visibility We can start to work together as a proto-collaboration in preparing it Measurable output Can be used for R&D proposal(s)

13. May 2, 2003Maury Goodman, White Paper for Reactor Workshop 13 White Paper-content Step towards a proposal Can flush out a variety of –Sites –Possible physics reaches –Possible costs –Systematic Error Issues Can be used as basis for proposal

14. May 2, 2003Maury Goodman, White Paper for Reactor Workshop 14 Outline

15. May 2, 2003Maury Goodman, White Paper for Reactor Workshop 15 Details ¤If it is agreed that this is desirable, I will volunteer to be editor ¤Format based in.tex ¤The more contributers, the better ¤Need first readers/editers ¤3 months for a fairly final draft?

16. May 2, 2003Maury Goodman, White Paper for Reactor Workshop 16 Proto-collaboration organization  Assuming that we want to form a proto-collaboration –MINOS has executive committee and institutional board –I would propose a physics committee of young firebrands for planning (Link, Reyna, Heeger) and a policy committee for politics (with more senior physicists).

17. May 2, 2003Maury Goodman, White Paper for Reactor Workshop 17 To Do List Identify writers for White Paper Choose a (temporary) name? Monthly phone meetings? Organize next meeting? Agree on proto-collaboration? Agree on Committees? Organize Software? –Site Visits? –Contact Funding Agencies?