1. District Name FOCUS AND PRIORITY SCHOOLS SIP – CYCLE # REVIEW SCHOOL NAME DATE 1

2. Table of Contents About this Template SIP Implementation Progress and Quality Student and Staff Attendance Student Discipline Culture and Climate Survey Benchmark/End of Unit Assessments Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rates Questions/Comments 2

3. About this Template This template is intended to be a model to consider when conducting SIP Cycle reviews. Content is based on the Focus/Priority Goals, Past/Future Proficiency Targets, reason school has been designated focus/priority, and SMART Goals. 3

4. SIP Implementation Progress and Quality Goal: At least 80% of school improvement plan actions are accomplished at each 6-8 week period. 4

5. SIP Implementation: Action Steps 5

6. 6

7. SMART GOAL #1 [SMART GOAL Text]  Planning stage  Initial Implementation  Operational Summary of Objectives/Action Steps Completion 7

8. SMART GOAL #2 [SMART GOAL Text]  Planning stage  Initial Implementation  Operational Summary of Objectives/Action Steps Completion 8

9. SMART GOAL #3 [SMART GOAL Text]  Planning stage  Initial Implementation  Operational Summary of Objectives/Action Steps Completion 9

10. SMART GOAL #4 [SMART GOAL Text]  Planning stage  Initial Implementation  Operational Summary of Objectives/Action Steps Completion 10

11. Student and Staff Attendance At least 92% attendance for targeted subgroups, school wide, and teachers that support those subgroups and school wide. Less than 5% of targeted subgroup students and students school-wide are chronically absent (>10% of schools days missed) 11

12. Student Attendance--YTD 12

13. Student Attendance--Monthly 13

14. Chronically Absent Students 14

15. Teacher Attendance--YTD 15

16. Teacher Attendance--Monthly 16

17. Goals—Student Discipline Less than 5% of targeted subgroup students and students school-wide are suspended 17

18. Suspension Summary Office Referrals : – September-[count] – October- [count] – November- [count] – [Include Additional months as needed] Suspensions: [Count] Students Suspended: [Count] Total days of lost instruction due to suspension: [count] 18

19. Students Suspensions by Group 19

20. Culture and Climate Survey 95% of students & teachers school-wide and for targeted subgroups participate in the survey 25% of parents (households) participate in the survey At least 80% of survey responders state that the school “meets expectations” 20

21. Fall Survey Participation Rates 21

22. Spring Survey Participation Rates 22

23. Focus for SCHOOL NAME: End of Unit Assessments At least 95% participation of students on the end-of-unit assessment At least 70% of students demonstrate proficiency on each Subject Learning Objective on standards-aligned end-of-unit assessments Reason for Classification Schoolwide Proficiency Lowest- Performing Subgroup Second Lowest- Performing Subgroup Highest- Performing Subgroup Avg Prof of Two Lowest Subgroups Highest Subgroup Proficiency Highest Within-School Gaps 51.00%SpedAf. Am.Asian19.80%66.80% Performance Gap:47.0% 23

24. Estimated* Participation Rate ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS Total Population Grade Total EnrolledTotal Assessed% Participation 9805569% 10906673% 11402255% 121007070% Total310213 Participation Rate - Total Pop 69% 24 Student Counts Based on SIS student count report on ______________ Students tested based on Interim Assessment data extracts from ___________

25. Estimated* Participation Rate 25 Student Counts Based on SIS student count report on ______________ Students tested based on Interim Assessment data extracts from ___________

26. ELA Performance Summary—EUA# 26

27. Estimated* Participation Rate Math Total Population Grade Total EnrolledTotal Assessed% Participation 9805569% 10906673% 11402255% 121007070% Total310213 Participation Rate - Total Pop 69% 27 Student Counts Based on SIS student count report on ______________ Students tested based on Interim Assessment data extracts from ___________

28. Estimated* Participation Rate 28 Student Counts Based on SIS student count report on ______________ Students tested based on Interim Assessment data extracts from ___________

29. Math Performance Summary—EUA# 29

30. Schoolwide Math Performance Band Comparisons 30

31. Additional Charts to Consider The following charts represent some options to consider when analyzing assessment performance. The following charts do not link to source data. 31

32. 32

33. 33

34. 34

35. 35

36. Retention and Failure Rates Student Retention Rates for 2012-2013 SY Student Course Failure Rates for Current School Year 36

37. 2012-2013 Retention Rates 2012-2013 Total Students Lowest Performing Subgroup 2nd Lowest Performing Subgroup Grades Total Number Number Retained Percent Retained Total Number Number Retained Percent Retained Total Number Number Retained Percent Retained 9 10066%30517%30413% 10 10066%30517%30413% 11 10066%30517%30413% 12 10066%30517%30413% Total 400246%1202017%1201613% 37

38. 2012-2013 Retention Rates 38

39. Course Failure Rates--YTD 2013-2014 Total Students Select Lowest Performing Subgroup Select 2nd Lowest Performing Subgroup Grades Number Failing 1 course Number Failing 2 course Number Failing 3 course Number Failing 4+ course Number Failing 1 course Number Failing 2 course Number Failing 3 course Number Failing 4+ course Number Failing 1 course Number Failing 2 course Number Failing 3 course Number Failing 4+ course 9 361312341231 10 452312342122 11 543312341213 12 634312342131 Total 18 101248 166697 39

40. Graduation Rates High school graduation rate: At least 75% graduation rate for each cohort year. 40

41. 41

42. Conclusion Questions? Comments? 42