1. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support

2. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support 5 HFM BOCES Distance Learning teachers responded to the survey. Numbers of first time and veteran DL Teachers

3. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support Section A Technical

4. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support Agree / Strongly Agree Disagree / Strongly Disagree 1. I was able to clearly see all of my students at remote site(s). Technical Uncertain

5. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support 2. I was able to clearly hear students and teacher aides at remote site(s). Agree / Strongly Agree Disagree / Strongly Disagree Technical

6. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support 3. Students at remote sites were able to hear me. Agree / Strongly Agree Disagree / Strongly Disagree Technical Uncertain

7. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support Uncertain **Student response* From remote site perspective 24% 52% Agree / Strongly Agree Disagree / Strongly Disagree 3. Students at remote sites were able to hear me. Technical * Re: Hearing teachers, aides and students.

8. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support 4. The Materials displayed over the network were clearly seen by students. Agree / Strongly Agree Disagree / Strongly Disagree Technical

9. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support 5. I felt comfortable using room equipment. Agree / Strongly Agree Disagree / Strongly Disagree Technical

10. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support 6. The room design was adequate for my teaching purposes. Technical Agree / Strongly Agree Disagree / Strongly Disagree

11. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support 7. I was satisfied with the technical support I received in dealing with network difficulties. Agree / Strongly Agree Uncertain Technical

12. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support Disagree / Strongly Disagree 8. Technically, the distance learning system performed well this year. Agree / Strongly Agree Technical

13. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support Section A Learning Environment

14. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support Disagree / Strongly Disagree 1. I could interact with individual students as often as I wanted. Agree / Strongly Agree Learning Environment

15. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support Disagree / Strongly Disagree 2. My interaction and rapport with students at remote sites was comparable to students at my home site. Agree / Strongly Agree Learning Environment

16. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support 3. The distance learning system provides an effective way to teach classes. Agree / Strongly Agree Learning Environment

17. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support Section A Overall Program

18. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support 1. The system for transferring assignments between sites was adequate. Agree / Strongly Agree Teacher Response Overall Program

19. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support 1. The system for transferring assignments between sites was adequate. Uncertain **Student response* from remote site perspective 8% 12% 80% Agree / Strongly Agree Teacher Response Disagree / Strongly Disagree * From HFM DL student survey. Overall Program

20. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support Disagree / Strongly Disagree 2. We had little trouble making up missed classes when necessary. Agree / Strongly Agree Uncertain Teacher Response Overall Program

21. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support Disagree / Strongly Disagree 2. We had little trouble making up missed classes when necessary. Uncertain Agree / Strongly Agree Teacher Response **Student response* from remote site perspective 17% 13% 7% 63% N/A Overall Program * From HFM DL Student Survey

22. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support 3. The overall coordination of the project was effective. Agree / Strongly Agree Overall Program

23. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support Agree / Strongly Agree 4. I would teach another course on the distance learning network. Overall Program

24. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support Agree / Strongly Agree 5. I would recommend taking courses on the distance learning network to students at my school. Overall Program

25. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support 6. I would recommend teaching courses on the network to colleagues. Overall Program Agree / Strongly Agree

26. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support 7. Overall, I am satisfied with the experience I have had teaching via DL this year. Overall Program Agree / Strongly Agree

27. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support No HFM first year DL Teachers responded. * First Year Instructors * 1. The training I received prior to teaching on the distance learning system prepared me well for teaching in the DL environment. Overall Program

28. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support * First Year Instructors * 2. Teaching via distance learning has lived up to my expectations. Overall Program No HFM first year DL Teachers responded.

29. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support Section B Teacher Comments

30. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ DL System is an excellent resource for offering additional courses to a variety of schools. It is great to get three different groups interacting. I really enjoy using the elmo and all the other functions of the system. DL allows smaller schools accessibility to courses they would not be able to carry. Also, it allows students from different schools to interact. [It is a] great teaching tool. [It] allows students to take courses that would not be offered at their home school. 1. What are the strengths of distance Learning? Comments

31. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ This year we had a few technical problems that were taken care of very well. However, one weakness was my inability to deal with situations at the remote sites effectively, such as: discipline, attendance, eating, drinking, talking etc. [I] needed more assistance. It is difficult to teach a calculator based technical course using DL. It is more difficult to have closer association with students from other sites. The sound due to system incompatibility. Sound quality. 2. What are the weaknesses of Distance Learning? Comments

32. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ There needed to be more responsibility taken by the aides in the remote sites. A dry erase board with a camera focused on it..computers in all stations. Larger TV screens for elmo and computer. 3. What changes would you suggest for distance learning classes? Comments

33. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ I had expected the remote sites to be more responsive. I had expected a few bumps and problems but was pleased at how quickly my technical concerns were handled. [It was] easier than expected. 4. Are there any outcomes from teaching this course that you had not expected? Comments

34. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Since I had only one student at the remote site I often had her come to the Elmo and use her calculator so I could watch. This wouldn't have worked as well with more students. Power Point was very effective. Comments 5. Did you use any new instructional methods to effectively teach in the DL classroom?

35. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Telephone, mail and faxes. I used e-mail, telephone and personal visits. Yes, e-mail, onsite visits and phone calls [were] very useful for homework. Comments 6. Did you use any other forms of communication with the students in addition to daily …... distance learning classroom instruction (such as e-mail or telephone)?

36. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support Comments 7A. Did you visit your remote sites? Yes No No response

37. .. HFM Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2002 – 2003 School Year BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Yes. Once so far. This was a great opportunity to personally see the student at the remote site. She did visit here once. [I was able to develop a] rapport with students from [the] other schools and [they were able to develop a] better understanding of my expectations. Comments 7B. What were the advantages / disadvantages to visiting your remote school(s)?