Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMarilynn Maxwell Modified over 8 years ago
1
Sum Frequency Generation in a Co- Propagating Beam Geometry from Thin Films Lei Li PhD Candidate, Department of Physics and Astronomy & The Forest Bioproducts Research Institute, The University of Maine
2
Sum Frequency Spectroscopy (SFS) is a surface specific non-linear pulsed laser technique capable of providing detailed molecular level orientation & conformational information of interfacial species. Application of the technique to thin film structures may result in complex spectra which require deconvolution. In the co-propagating beam geometry, three periodicities describing the relationship between film thickness & SF intensity are found.
3
Thickness/Phase Effect In SFS Spectra( 3 SF beam theoretical model) The phase and intensity of the SF signal arising from thin cellulose films on reflective substrates (gold) is a function of the cellulose film thickness. reflective substrates (gold) is a function of the cellulose film thickness. a) water/cellulose/gold interface. interface. IR=2878cm -1 (r+) IR=2878cm -1 (r+) Dominant Periodicity=268nm Minor Periodicities=296nm, 2857nm b) water/cellulose/gold interface. interface. IR=2966cm -1 (r-) IR=2966cm -1 (r-) c) air/cellulose/gold interface. interface. IR=2878cm -1 (r+) IR=2878cm -1 (r+) d) air/cellulose/gold interface. interface. IR=2966cm -1 (r-) IR=2966cm -1 (r-) Dominant Periodicity=267nm Minor Periodicities=294nm, 2857nm Dominant Periodicity=238nm Minor Periodicities=248nm, 6024nm Dominant Periodicity=237nm Minor Periodicities=247nm, 6024nm
4
If further sources of SF generation are considered, seven additional periodicities can be simulated.
5
Air/cellulose/gold interface, IR=2878cm -1, r+ vibrational mode Applying the 5 SF beam theoretical model, we can describe the cellulose thickness/phase effect more explicitly. The three periodicities (red) which are also derived from the 3 beam model are predicted by the 5 beam model, although they do not have the highest intensities. We have not accounted for beam attenuation which will decrease SF intensity. Substrates of well defined thickness are presently being prepared for experimental verification of the model’s predictions.Periodicity(nm) SF Intensity(arb) 6024.10.860062 2551.020.438371 1798.5616.4394 1392.767.26852 342.2317.8651 302.1150.344439 287.85321.7658 274.8768.6449 248.260.484184 238.5518.9202 d(nm ) Normalized SF Intensity Normalized SF intensity on resonance versus cellulose thickness
6
Funding NSF Forest Bioproducts Research Initiative of The University of Maine The University of Maine Graduate School Acknowledgements : Advisor Dr. David Neivandt Dr. Michael Mason Postdoctoral Dr. Joerg Fick Fellow Graduate Student Sarah Sterling
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.