Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySherman McDonald Modified over 8 years ago
1
Electrophoto-production of strangeness and Hypernuclei Osamu Hashimoto Department of Physics, Tohoku University October 21-22, 2004 Jeju University
2
Strangeness production by pions and photons 2 1 1.21.41.61.8 σ total ( b) 1.0 2.0 E γ (GeV) p( ,K + ) Total cross section Phys. Lett. B 445, 20 (1998) M. Q. Tran et al.
3
Basic characteristics of the (e,e ’ K + ) spectroscopy Proton converted to Neutron rich hypernuclei Large angular momentum transfer Similarly to ( +,K + ) reaction Spin-flip amplitude Unnatural parity hypernuclear states High quality primary beam Sub MeV resolution
4
The (e,e ’ K + ) reactions --- elementary and hypernuclear --- Elementary process Hypernuclear production
5
n K 0 reaction data near the threshold play an important role No contribution from the t-channel Born term Less contribution of resonances terms Isobar model Elementary processes of photo-strangeness production g(K 0 0 n) = -g(K + 0 p) Coupling constants Resonances to be included New high-quality data being available for K + However, Six possible isospin channels: (1) p( ,K+) (2) p( ,K+) 0 (3) p( ,K0) + (4) n( ,K+) - (5) n( ,K0) (6) n( ,K0) 0
6
n( ,K) Model calculation γ + n → K 0 + Λ Energy dependence Angular distribution calculated by Sotona’s code γ + p → K + + Λ E γ = 1.05 GeV Kaon-MAID : T.Mart, C.Bennhold, Phys. Rev. C61 (2000) 012201(R) http://kph.uni-mainz.de/MAID/ kaon/kaonmaid.html SLA : T.Mizutani et al., Phys. Rev. C58 (1998) 75.
7
Laboratory for Nuclear Science, Tohoku University at Sendai Neutral Kaon Spectrometer ( NKS ) 200 MeV LINAC 1.2 GeV Booster/stretcher ring エネルギー標識化光子ビー ム up to 1.1 GeV/c Good duty factor
8
First observation of neutral kaons in the threshold region K 0 ~ 450 Background Invariant Mass ( ) (GeV/c 2 ) counts/20MeV K 0 s : c 2.68cm 12 C target K s 0 + + - (64 %)
9
solid: Kaon-MAID n( ,K 0 ) only dashed: Kaon-MAID include p( ,K 0 ) + + n( ,K 0 ) 0 solid: SLA n( ,K 0 ) N eff = 4.2 k F 0 =0.22GeV/c Comparison with recent models + 12 C K 0 + X ( Quasi-free K 0 production) preliminary
10
Neutral kaons from the liquid deuterium target K 0 S : c ~ 2.68 cm x ~ 1.6mm
11
Comparison of D2 target data with theoretical models preliminary
12
Upgrade plan at LNS, Tohoku STB ring radiator 1.2 GeV e - NKS2 Pole diameter : 160 cm B MAX : 0.5 T High momentum & mass resolution Efficiency more than 2X for K 0 Efficiency more than 10 x for Ready in 2005
13
K + detection At very forward angle (~ 0 degrees) Maximum hypernuclear production cross section e’ detection At extremely forward angles Advantage : Large virtual photon flux Disadvantage : Huge backgrounds from Bremsstrahlung Hypernuclear production by the (e,e ’ K + ) reaction p e =0.3GeV/c e’ K+K+ p K =1.2 GeV/c E e =1.8 GeV e - Beam Target nucleus E =1.5 GeV
14
Angular distribution of electrons and kaons Ee = 1.864 GeV Ee’=0.4 GeV Ee = 1.864 GeV Ee’ = 0.38 GeV angle (deg) d /d (nb/sr) electronskaons (degrees) Calculated by Sotona’s code
15
Jlab Accelerator Hall BHall AHall C Beam characteristics E max 6 GeV Max. Current 200 A Duty factor 100% Emittance 2.0 m·mrad E beam 2.5 10 -5 (FWHM) E89-009 E01-011 E97-107
16
E89-009 experimental setup To beam dump
17
E89-009 calibration p(e,e’K + ) p(e,e’K + ) 12 C(e,e’K + ) quasi-free Accidental e e’e+e+ e-e- 815 keV (FWHM) CH x target A(e,e’;(e+,e-))A
18
138 nb/sr 12 B spectrum of E89-009 d /d nb/sr/0.3 MeV -B (MeV) -15051015-5-10 (2+,3+)(1-,2-) (1-,0-) (2-,1-) 40 50 60 70 80 90 Ground state doublet B = 11.52±0.35 MeV Cross section 140±17(stat) ±18(sys) nb/sr Motoba’s calculation J cross section 1 - 23.4 nb/sr 2 - 114.5 nb/sr Binding energy Emulsion data B = 11.37 MeV 750 keV(FWHM) 1 month data
19
7 He Spectrum of E89-009 No peaks observed in the bound region A suggestive bump at around 7-8 MeV Background subtracted d /d nb/sr/0.3 MeV 120 140 160 180 200 7 Li(e,e’K+) 7 He 20 40 0 60 80 -20 -1010200 -1010200 Sotona -B ( MeV) -10-510152050 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 6 He + n 6 He + 5/2 + 3/2 + 3/2 - 1/2 + 5/2 - 7/2 - 3/2 - 5/2 - -B ( MeV) Shell model calc. by Sotona
20
E~400 keV 12 C (e,e’K) 12 B Very Preliminary Data with Multiple Uncorrected Beam Energies “Standard” PID Full statistics with fitted peaks. Resolution still not fully optimized Subsets of data appear to have better resolution Limited statistics + cut on Beam x position at 1C12 + ± 50 keV on relative beam energy E=1.3 MeV (FWHM) Guarantees beam within specs Projected Data Beam energy spread and spectrometer resolutions as planned E~800 keV From Prof. Garibaldi HALL A
21
Hypernuclear spectroscopy experiments at Jlab Area Ee (GeV) E (GeV) e (deg.) p K (GeV/c) K (deg.) Spectrometers Run year E89-009Hall C1.7-1.81.501.20-7 SOS+ENGE, Splitter 2000 E94-107Hall A41.96 6 HRS+HRS, Septum 2004 E01-011Hall C1.81.54.51.20-14 HKS+ ENGE (Tilt), Splitter 2005 ???Hall C2.2-2.51.5~31.20-14 HKS+HES, New splitter 2007? MAINZ to join
22
The tilt method for higher luminosity Side view
23
Future spectrometer system for the (e,e ’ K + ) reaction High resolution Electron Spectrometer HES (2.2~2.5GeV)
24
Yield comparison of E01-011 and E89-009 Item E01- 011 E89-009 Gain factor Virtual photon flux per electron(x10 -4 ) 0.2- 0.35 4 0.05- 0.0875 Target thickness(mg/cm 2 )100224.5 Scattered electron momentum acceptance(MeV/c) 1501201.2 Kaon survival rate0.350.40.88 Solid angle of K arm1653.2 Beam current( A) 300.6645 Estimated yield ( 12 B gr :counts/h) ~50 0.9 (measured) 60
25
Expected 28 Al hypernuclear spectra SKS E140a 28 Si( +,K + ) 28 Si
26
Summary Photo strangeness production in the 1 GeV region Neutral kaon measurement plays a unique role NKS at LNS, Tohoku measured neutral kaons NKS2 for further experimental study of neutral kaon production is under construction Hypernuclear production by the (e,e ’ K + ) reaction The first 2 experiments were successfully carried out at Jlab Hall C and Hall A 2 nd generation hypernuclear spectroscopy by the (e,e ’ K + ) reaction is to be carried out in 2005 High resolution electron spectrometer is under construction for the 3 rd generation (e,e ’ K + ) spectroscopy
27
E top 2pass (GeV) Acceptable energy windows of HKS system with ENGE or HES revised 04/10/10 1 0.55 0.4 0.3 0.60.8 E e’ (GeV) 2.51.81.9 E e at Hall (GeV) Acceptable Central Energy (GeV) HES ENGE 2.02.22.4 E top 1 pass (GeV) 4.44.555.06.0 9.4510.310.8 12.0 2.05 0.65 2.15
28
Invariant mass spectrum Invariant mass [GeV/c 2 ] K 0 mass region 0.46 – 0.54 GeV/c 2 accidental events miss ID events k0 candidates
29
Momentum distribution Error : statistical only
30
Virtual photon energy E 1.5 GeV Beam energy E e = 1.721, 1.864 GeV Reaction Threshold(MeV) p K K K K * (892) 2 1 1.21.41.61.8 σ total ( b) 1.0 2.0 E γ (GeV) Total cross section Phys. Lett. B 445, 20 (1998) M. Q. Tran et al. Experimental condition Limited by bremsstrahlung electrons at 0 deg. in scattered electron spectrometer p( , K + ) Beam current < 2 A < 0.6 A for 12 C target Target thickness < 100 mg/cm 2 nat C 22 mg/cm 2 CH 2 8.8 mg/cm 2
31
N T : target density N X : or 12 B g.s yield N : Number of virtual photon integrated over Ee’ and e’ total : total correction factor Cross section Cross sections were extracted with experimental yields Triple-differential cross section
32
12 B spectrum fitting results Fitted by 3 Gaussians and a constant Energy resolution was fixed 0.9 MeV(FWHM) Constant = 5±1 nb/sr/400keV
33
Energy level of 12 B spectrum Emulsion data B =11.37±0.06 MeV 3/2 - 1/2 - 3/2 - 5.0 2.1 0.26 0.20 1.72 S factor 12 C(e,e’p) 11 B 11 B x s 12 B Ex(MeV) d /d (nb/sr) 2.51 5.44 Ex(MeV) B (g.s)=12.20±0.06±0.25 MeV : 30±15±4 59±14±7 122 ±12 ±15
34
12 B spectrum v.s 12 C spectrum 12 C KEK E369 Structure is similar S and P states are observed SS PP SS PP
35
E =1.3GeV, =3deg., 900 keV(FWHM), NSC97f DWIA calculation with phenomenological potential by Motoba Theoretical prediction of 12 B spectrum
36
Theoretical calculation of 28 Al spectrum 300 keV (FWHM) ls splitting ??? high spin and unnatural parity states Calculated by Sotona et al.
37
DWIA calculation by a code of M.Sotona Angular distribution Angular distribution of 12 B states (p3/2) -1 (p3/2) 3 + (s1/2) -1 (p1/2) 2 - (p3/2) -1 (s1/2) 2 - (s1/2) -1 (s1/2) 1 + Expected yield ratio between g.s.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.