1. Humanities RQF Trial Results & RQF Groups September 2007

2. RQF Trial Results

3. RQF Trial Divisional Results Ancient HistoryAsianEnglishEuropean Modern HistoryMusicPol & IRTOTAL Rate 5502020110 Rate 4716331122 Rate 3112351114 Rate 2211322112 Rate 101020003 TOTAL15411 124461

4. Humanities RQF Plan Ancient History Group Leaders: Assoc. Prof. Tom Hillard Dr Trevor Evans RFCD: 430110 (Hist: Class) 430203 (Arch: Med, Levant) 440204 (Rel: Chr. Hist) Modern History and Politics Group Leaders: Prof. Angela Woollacott Prof. Murray Goot RFCD : 430100 (Hist : Discipline code) 420303 (CultSt : Culture, Gender, Sexuality) 360100 (PolSc : Discipline code) English and European Literatures Group Leaders: Prof. John Stephens Assoc. Prof. Martina Möllering RFCD: 420200 (Lit Studies: Discipline code) 420306 (CultSt: Postcolonial and Global Cultural Studies) (Ancient History) (Asian Languages) ______________ Not in trial: 5 (Modern History) (Politics and IR) (Asian Languages) (Division) ______________ Not in trial: 4 (English) (European Languages) In trial: 14 (+ up to 5) Average score: 4.2 5: 5 4: 7 3: 1 In trial: 16 (+ up to 5) Average score: 3.8 5: 3 4: 7 3: 6 In trial: 16 Average score: 3.8 5: 2 4: 9 3: 5 Contemporary Music Studies  Anthropology/Cultural Practice group

5. Group Leaders (Preparation of ‘Evidence Portfolio’ for RQF Submission) Ancient History Group: Assoc. Prof. Tom Hillard Dr. Trevor Evans Modern History and Politics Group: Prof. Angela Woollacott Prof. Murray Goot English and European Literatures Group: Prof. John Stephens Assoc. Prof. Martina Möllering

6. RQF Submission ‘Home Panels’ (13): Panel 9: Social Sciences and Politics Panel 12: Humanities Panel 13: Creative Arts, Design, and Built Environment Evidence Portfolio: 1. Group identification 2. Context Statement 3. Details of each researcher 4. Statement of Claims for Impact 5. Metrics (journal rankings)

7. Evidence Portfolio 1.Group identification: Name of Group RFCD codes (up to 3) and SEO codes Home Panel and any cross-disciplinary Panel

8. Evidence Portfolio 2. Context Statement: Statement of history, strategic focus, and research objectives of the Group Summary of main achievements of the Group Extent of Cohesion and Collaboration within the Group Collaborative research within the Institution (i.e. University) and/or elsewhere (Australia and overseas) Support for ECRs and HDR students Esteem factors Comment on difficulties overcome Funding income

9. Evidence Portfolio 3. Details of each researcher: Four ‘Best’ ‘Body of Work’ (all publications) (i.e. a revised version of information prepared for the RQF Trial, using feedback from comments)

10. Evidence Portfolio 4. Statement of Claims for Impact: Engagement with end-users (including academic discipline) Uptake of research (e.g. public policy) Extent to which research has produced social, economic, environmental, cultural benefits 5. Metrics (journal rankings)