1. Increasing service user influence on the selection of nursing students Fiona Dobson, Beryl Pearson & Elaine Walker

2. Context NMC drivers: 2010 Standards for pre-registration nursing education NHS key performance indicators Fitness for practice Political drivers in health and public sectors Changing public expectations Francis Report (2013)

3. Process Development: 2011-2012 What was our previous process? Why did we want to change? What did we want to achieve? What were the primary aims? Who to involve? How to consult with others? What was our time-frame? What were other AEIs doing? What did the literature say?

4. Refining Process: Not what but how? Achievable across the nations and regions Manageable Equitable Endorsement of service users Resource effective

5. Annual review of selection process Short Timescale SU agreed decision SUs briefed and prepared Consultation on topic for applicant’s discussion task for SU OU Staff Supporting statement (UCAS criteria) + SU discussion task Short listed Y/N or Accept/Reject application Guidance notes + application form sent out Application submitted (electronically) Provides details of applicant’s discussion task for SU Consequential benefit = IT skills Initial Process

6. Support from OU academic/admin staff Consequences: e.g. Issues if SU away, sick, lacks IT OU/ Partner / practitioner Applicant given verbal feedback on task & SU question asked by panel SU grades task, prepares interview question and returns to OU Support from OU academic/admin staff Applicant’s task made anonymous & sent to SU with criteria Applicant has face to face individual interview Information added to selection record Interview outcome: accept or reject? SU question is equal weighting in interview schedule Feedback to applicant and SU Process for shortlisted applicants Short Timescale

7. 2012: Pilot Phase How we identified service users Preparing and supporting service users Approximately 160 discussion tasks reviewed by 16 service users Informal feedback from employers Informal feedback from service users

8. Plan for evaluation: 2013 Case study approach Statistical returns Survey monkey EmployersTelephone focus group ApplicantsAs above Service UserAs above Emerging themes Identify and disseminate best practice Consequential benefits

9. Open forum & any questions