Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byStella Briggs Modified over 9 years ago
1
Dr Joanne Thomas What makes a good application? RIF event – 29 July 2010
2
Overview 1.Criteria 2.Key elements 3.Common pitfalls and tips for success 4.Round 4 and post-award
3
Criteria
4
Criteria (1) - recommendations
5
Criteria (2) - QIPP Quality: –Safety, patient experience, patient outcomes, social value, sustainable communities Innovation: –New ways, evidence/plausible, scope Productivity: –Increase productivity/effectiveness, cash released Prevention: –Impact on healthy life/independence
6
Criteria (3) Working across boundaries e.g. –Primary and secondary care –Primary care and education –Health and social care –Acute and mental health providers Total funding available Executive Director sign-off
7
Key elements
8
People Key people from each organisation involved Rights skills Knowledge Commitment Stakeholders
9
The innovation What is it? How does it work? Where does it come from? –totally new –modification –adoption What are the likely benefits?
10
Proposal should be clear
11
Evaluation What measures will demonstrate effect Baseline How will data be collected and analysed Who will do it Pure research excluded
12
Sustainability and transferability Consider sustainability post-funding: –Resources –Personnel Provide evidence of transferability and scalability: –NHS North West wants innovation spread –Consider dissemination options
13
Costing Liaise with your finance department Contact them early Include VAT Include on-costs Consider financial year
14
Pitfalls and tips
16
Don’t leave it too late! AwardNumber of online applications (round 3) 11 May12 May – 4pm deadline 1pm2pm3pmFinal Sharing4 (17%) 9 (39%) 11 (48%) 12 (52%) 23 (100%) Bursary9 (18%) 21 (42%) 25 (50%) 36 (72%) 50 (100%) Enabling change 11 (11%) 27 (29%) 34 (36%) 52 (55%) 94 (100%)
17
Common pitfalls Not read guidance Not answered all questions Excluded: e.g. research, product development Didn’t fit award criteria Too long (2+ years) Unclear proposal Funding exceeds maximum available Funding required unspecified Applicant provides supporting statement
18
Top tips Read the guidance Answer all the questions Make the sound bite clear and memorable Provide background information Explain acronyms Remember that judges are not necessarily experts in your area Use numbers to support your claims (e.g. no. patients, potential cost- savings)
19
Writing Sell the problem – why is the issue so important? Keep names/words consistent Short sentences Short paragraphs Front load text with key info Message consistent
20
Judging “They will read the applications in this massive bundle in snatched minutes of spare time, in their offices, in their laboratories, during boring meetings, on trains, buses and planes, in taxis, in bathrooms, in hotel dining rooms.” The grant-writer's toolkit - Andrew Derrington (21 January 2010)
21
Sense check
22
Round 4
23
Round 4 timeline LaunchAug 2010 DeadlineEarly Oct 2010 Funding decisionDec 2010 Funding awardedJan 2011 Projects startJan 2011
24
Round 4 details No enabling change awards (up to £250k) Previous award winners can only apply for an innovation in a different area Funding available –~£105k innovation sharing –~£213k innovation bursary
25
If successful… Get letter from NHS North West Paid via PCT allocations Monitoring of progress and outcomes by TrusTECH : –Start –About 6 months –End
26
Summary Meet the criteria Follow the guidance Make the proposal clear Remember it is a competition
27
Contact
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.