1. 19th January 2012 Don Wells (Hess)
API RP 17N Subsea Production System Reliability and Technical Risk Management & Integrity Management
19th January 2012
Don Wells (Hess)

2. Agenda Introduction Scope Membership General Progress Detail Progress
Integration 17 Committee/ISO

3. Introduction
Incorporate Integrity Management into current API 17N …Subsea Reliability and Technical Risk Management
Recognize and incorporate integration with other Industry initiatives
Incorporate updates based on feedback from using existing 17N document
Respond to recent industry experiences

4. Scope Review of Summer Meeting topics
Continue previously presented scope
Additional scope – API 17A requirements Design and Operations of Subsea Production Systems
Greenfield
Brownfield
Future requirements

5. Membership Room for additional membership
Organized into subcommittees
Design and Decommission
Manufacture, Assembly, SIT, Installation, Commissioning
Operations
Technology Qualification
Regulations
Room for additional membership
Opportunity to Make a Difference

6. General Progress 2010 – 2011 2012 - Planned
Storming and forming - Complete
Gap Analysis – Mostly Complete
Interfacing with Runar Østebø –
Statoil & convener of ISO/TC67 WG4
Planned
Define Tone (prescriptive / recommend)
Work the Gaps
Work the Interfaces
Industry Peer Assist Workshop
SURF IM Forum

7. Detail Progress Define Scope - Completed Define Charter – Completed
Divide and Conquer
Design and Decommission
New Key Process (KP) for Through Life to be Developed
Does API want Risk Based or Safety Case Approach? (Hybrid?)
Do we want/need to meet with BSEE to discuss?
don’t have all the answers yet. We are working it and this is a representation of where we are. Storm and Form approach has been taken

8. Detail Progress Divide and Conquer
Manufacture, Assembly, SIT, Installation, Commissioning
Matrix Developed
Where & How to test being worked
Does Verification and Validation need new KP? (Rewrite KP06?)
MOC being worked
don’t have all the answers yet. We are working it and this is a representation of where we are. Storm and Form approach has been taken

9. Detail Progress Divide and Conquer – cont. Operations
Reviewed and Raised issues with existing 12 KPs
Proposed 3 additional KPs
Field Modifications
Inspection and Monitoring
Remedial Intervention
Added 3 Processes to “Project Phase Guide to Processes”

10. Detail Progress Divide and Conquer – cont. Technology Qualification
New Risks Identified
Obsolescence – Misuse of TRLs
New Technologies
New materials
Keep integrated as a section in API 17N
If not, make it a Technical Reference
Make Generic vs. Prescriptive
Robust, Goal Based with examples
Utilize DNV RP A-203 as much as possible
Evaluate the use in early conceptual phase
Survey Industry to ID Qualifying Technologies main challenges

11. Detail Progress Divide and Conquer – cont. Regulations
Managing Committees 1-4 Interfaces
Will lead Prescriptive vs. Recommend discussions
On hold until more definition / decisions from other committees

12. Path Forward Path Forward Write Review Ballot
Continue Subcommittee work
Outline of Process to use as QA tool
Common Matrix to combine / review completed work
Work the idea of using SURF IM Forum to discuss with industry and gather additional input
Write
Review
Ballot

13. Interface / Integration
API 17A, API Q1
ISO
Collection and exchange of reliability and maintenance data for equipment
Production assurance and reliability management
Life Cycle Costing
TR Reliability modeling and calculation of safety systems
Review committee draft document
Feedback 17N specific comments
DNV RP A203/API RP 17Q?