Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Assessment Prioritization Activity (Design/Implementation) Monitoring ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT Modification.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Assessment Prioritization Activity (Design/Implementation) Monitoring ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT Modification."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 Assessment Prioritization Activity (Design/Implementation) Monitoring ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT Modification

3 Assessment Assessment Prioritization Prioritization Activity Activity Monitoring Monitoring ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT  What is the Resource Condition?  Why?  What is the Resource Condition?

4 RIPARIAN MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES Pool Frequency Water Temperature Large Woody Debris Bank Stability Lower bank Angle Width/Depth Ratio Width 10 20 25 50 75 100 125 150 200 Pools/Mile 96 56 47 26 23 18 14 12 9 <10, mean wetted width/mean depth 64 0 F - Migration & Rearing 60 0 F - Spawning >80 pieces/mile; >24” dia.; >35’ len. - Coast >20 pieces/mile; >12” dia.; >35’ len. - Eastside > 80% Stable >75% of banks with 75% of banks with <90% angle

5 » Determine potential and capability PFC Helps » Define issues that need to be addressed » Selecting appropriate management practices » Determine appropriate monitoring » Provide linkage between reach/watershed processes and habitat/water quality conditions

6 Assessment Assessment Prioritization Prioritization Activity Activity Monitoring Monitoring ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT Why Why Why Why Why Why Why Why Resource Condition

7 PFC does not necessarily equal Desired Condition Moyer 2002 PFC

8 » Determine potential and capability » Define issues that need to be addressed » Selecting appropriate management practices » Determine appropriate monitoring PFC Helps » Provide linkage between reach/watershed processes and habitat/water quality conditions processes and habitat/water quality conditions

9 Water Quality (water temperature) Inflow In channel Adjacent slopes Sub Surface Flow Springs Bank Storage Shading Topographic Riparian Width:Depth Ratio Bank Storage Riparian Width:Depth Ratio

10 Date -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 8-Aug 12-Aug16-Aug20-Aug24-Aug28-Aug Temperature (Degrees F) Air Water Difference Difference in Air & Water Temperatures Bear Creek - Central Oregon 1977

11 Difference in Air & Water Temperatures Bear Creek - Central Oregon 1998 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 7-Aug 11-Aug 15-Aug 19-Aug 23-Aug27-Aug 31-Aug Date Temperature Degrees F Air Water Difference

12 » Velocity » Depth » Position In Channel » Shape » Turbulence » Cover Physical Habitat Structure » Velocity » Depth » Position In Channel » Shape » Turbulence » Cover

13 PFC Functioning at Risk Non-functioning

14 Assessment Assessment Prioritization Prioritization Activity Activity Monitoring Monitoring ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT  Based on need  Reach, watershed, basin scale

15

16 Assessment Assessment Prioritization Prioritization Activity Activity Monitoring Monitoring ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT  Designed to address the “why”  Reach, watershed, basin scale

17 » Determine potential and capability » Define issues that need to be addressed » Selecting appropriate management practices » Determine appropriate monitoring PFC Helps » Provide linkage between reach/watershed processes and habitat/water quality conditions processes and habitat/water quality conditions

18 Natural Riparian Resources Vegetation Soil, Landscape Water

19 Assessment Assessment Prioritization Prioritization Activity Activity Monitoring Monitoring ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT  Is the Resource Condition Improving?  Is the activity ‘fixing” the “why”?  Is the Resource Condition Improving?

20 Implement Action Desired Resource Conditions Monitor RIPARIAN MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES Pool Frequency Water Temperature Large Woody Debris Bank Stability Lower bank Angle Width/Depth Ratio Width 10 20 25 50 75 100 125 150 200 Pools/Mile 96 56 47 26 23 18 14 12 9 <10, mean wetted width/mean depth 64 0 F - Migration & Rearing 60 0 F - Spawning >80 pieces/mile; >24” dia.; >35’ len. - Coast >20 pieces/mile; >12” dia.; >35’ len. - Eastside > 80% Stable >75% of banks with 75% of banks with <90% angle

21 Time 0 Decades Width 10 20 25 50 75 100 125 150 200 Pools/Mile 96 56 47 26 23 18 14 12 9 <10, mean wetted width/mean depth 64 0 F - Migration & Rearing 60 0 F - Spawning >80 pieces/mile; >24” dia.; >35’ len. - Coast >20 pieces/mile; >12” dia.; >35’ len. - Eastside RIPARIAN MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES Pool Frequency Water Temperature Large Woody Debris Bank Stability Lower bank Angle Width/Depth Ratio > 80% Stable >75% of banks with 75% of banks with <90% angle Implement Action Desired Resource Conditions Monitor

22 Assessment Assessment Prioritization Prioritization Activity Activity Monitoring Monitoring ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT  Is the Resource Condition Improving?  Is the activity ‘fixing” the “why”?

23 Implement Action Short Term Indicators Revise Mid Term Indicators Revise Ultimate Objectives Monitor Monitor Monitor 0Time Decades 5 10

24 » Determine appropriate monitoring PFC Helps » Determine potential and capability » Define issues that need to be addressed » Selecting appropriate management practices » Provide linkage between reach/watershed processes and habitat/water quality conditions processes and habitat/water quality conditions appropriate

25 Recovery Rates Non-Functional

26 Current Conditions Desired Future Conditions

27 Current Conditions Desired Future Conditions PFC

28 » Desired Future Condition (DFC) PFC does not equal PFC does not replace » Legal Requirements, e.g., ESA, CWA Supports

29


Download ppt "Assessment Prioritization Activity (Design/Implementation) Monitoring ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT Modification."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google