Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Investigation on 1024 QAM feasibility in 11ax

Published byJoel Payne Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Investigation on 1024 QAM feasibility in 11ax"— Presentation transcript:

1 Investigation on 1024 QAM feasibility in 11ax
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2014 Investigation on 1024 QAM feasibility in 11ax Date: Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone Eunsung Park LG Electronics 19, Yangjea-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea Wookbong Lee Jinsoo Choi Jinyoung Chun Dongguk Lim HanGyu Cho Eunsung Park, LG Electronics John Doe, Some Company

2 Motivation (1/2) Based on PAR [1] Based on observation
May 2014 Motivation (1/2) Based on PAR [1] Main goal of 11ax is to “at least four times improvement in the average throughput per station”. Based on observation In most indoor scenarios, STAs transmit with the highest MCS level. MCS portion in Scenario1 (See Appendix A for simul. parameters.) MCS0 MCS1 MCS2 MCS3 MCS4 MCS5 MCS6 MCS7 MCS8 MCS9 DL [%] 2 98 UL [%] 1 9 83 Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

3 May 2014 Motivation (2/2) 1024 QAM provides 25% additional spectral efficiency compared to 256 QAM. However, the spectral efficiency gain in link-level by 1024 QAM does not guarantee average throughput gain in system-level. Key Question: “How much system-level gain can be obtained by adopting 1024 QAM in 11ax?” Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

4 Link curve including 1024 QAM
May 2014 Link curve including 1024 QAM Two additional MCSs for 1024 QAM MCS 10 : 1024QAM with 3/4 code rate MCS 11 : 1024QAM with 5/6 code rate MCS 11 requires about 32dB SNR for PER of 10%. (Gray mapped constellation in Appendix B, BCC with a random interleaver) Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

5 Simulation Environments
May 2014 Simulation Environments Simulation parameters are described in Appendix A. We simulate for SISO and 2 by 2 MIMO with space time block code (STBC) and spatial multiplexing (SM). In each simulation scenario [2] with 1024 QAM, we will investigate MCS portion selected for data transmission Average throughput gain Detailed simulation results are presented in Appendix C, D and E. Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

6 Simulation Results: MCS Portion
May 2014 Simulation Results: MCS Portion Residential Enterprise Indoor hotspot Outdoor SISO In indoor scenarios, 1024 QAM MCS levels are selected with high probability. STBC SM Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

7 Simulation Results: Average Throughput Gain
May 2014 Simulation Results: Average Throughput Gain • In most indoor scenarios, 1024 QAM provides average throughput gain over 20% compared to the case without 1024 QAM. Average Throughput Gain by including 1024 QAM [Unit : %] Residential Enterprise Indoor hotspot Outdoor DL UL SISO 22 18 25 21 20 11 1 STBC 24 12 2 SM 13 14 3 5 Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

8 Hardware Feasibility (1/2)
May 2014 Hardware Feasibility (1/2) 1024 QAM lowers the minimum allowed constellation error (EVM) below -38dB. 6dB tighter than the minimum value of 11ac (-32dB for MCS9). Modulation Coding rate Allowed constellation error [dB] BPSK 1/2 -5 QPSK -10 3/4 -13 16 QAM -16 -19 64 QAM 2/3 -22 -25 5/6 -27 256 QAM -30 -32 1024 QAM -36 -38 Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

9 Hardware Feasibility (2/2)
May 2014 Hardware Feasibility (2/2) Need to mainly check on the following issues. Feasibility becomes higher by the time when 11ax is in the market around 2018. Hardware Issues Feasibility Power amplifier (PA) Non-linearity One of the most challenging issues PA supporting 1024 QAM is already feasible in wired broadcasting system. Need to check if it is feasible in wireless system due to its lack of power Analog to digital converter (ADC) Quantization error Current ADC technology and more advancement seem to make it feasible. Local oscillator / synthesizer Phase noise I/Q imbalances This feasibility can be checked together with ADC feasibility since the error here is combined with ADC output. Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

10 Conclusions We showed that
May 2014 Conclusions We showed that In indoor scenarios, 1024 QAM provides system-level gain of 10 ~ 20 % even in 2 by 2 MIMO with SM. The gain is increasing in SISO and STBC. It is also important that from the user perspective, 1024 QAM provides 25% peak data rate increase as well as average throughput enhancement. We propose to check hardware feasibility to meet the lower EVM requirement. Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

11 May 2014 References [1] hew hew-sg-proposed-par [2] hew-simulation-scenarios-document-template [3] hew-improved-spatial-reuse-feasibility-part-i Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

12 May 2014 Appendices Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

13 Appendix A. Simulation Parameters
May 2014 Appendix A. Simulation Parameters Simulation scenario Scenario1 Scenario2 Scenario3 Scenario4 AP/STA power [dBm] 23 / 17 24 / 21 17 / 15 30 / 15 # of users per BSS 5 32 30 50 Run time Initial: 10s, simulation: 10s, drop: 5 BW 40MHz (128 FFT) Data size 1ms TXOP less fixed overhead (RTS/CTS off) Normal overhead: SIFS + ACK + 2*PLCP header GI Long (0.8 us) # of AP/STA antennas Rank1: SISO(1,1)/Alamouti(2,2), Rank2: SM(2,2) (interference model: AWGN) Max # of retries Scenario1: 4, other scenarios: 10 DL & UL traffic Full buffer (DL & UL ratio: based on PHY system simulation in [2]) CCA level Preamble detection: -82dBm (both AP and STA) Energy detection: -62dBm (both AP and STA) Channel Time-varying Target PER 0.1 PHY abstraction Capacity based method MCS selection Genie method Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

14 Appendix B. 1024QAM Constellation
May 2014 Appendix B. 1024QAM Constellation 01111 01110 01100 01101 01001 01000 01010 01011 00011 00010 00000 00001 00101 00100 00110 00111 10111 10110 10100 10101 10001 10000 10010 10011 11011 11010 11000 11001 11101 11100 11110 11111 Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

15 Appendix C. Simulation Results for SISO (1)
May 2014 Appendix C. Simulation Results for SISO (1) Scenario MCS Portion Scenario 1 MCS0 MCS1 MCS2 MCS3 MCS4 MCS5 MCS6 MCS7 MCS8 MCS9 MCS10 MCS11 Down-link w/o 1024 QAM [%] 2 98 - w/ 1024 QAM [%] 1 96 Up-link 9 83 4 77 Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

16 Appendix C. Simulation Results for SISO (2)
May 2014 Appendix C. Simulation Results for SISO (2) Scenario MCS Portion Scenario 2 MCS0 MCS1 MCS2 MCS3 MCS4 MCS5 MCS6 MCS7 MCS8 MCS9 MCS10 MCS11 Down-link w/o 1024 QAM [%] 100 - w/ 1024 QAM [%] Up-link 2 98 1 95 Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

17 Appendix C. Simulation Results for SISO (3)
May 2014 Appendix C. Simulation Results for SISO (3) Scenario MCS Portion Scenario 3 MCS0 MCS1 MCS2 MCS3 MCS4 MCS5 MCS6 MCS7 MCS8 MCS9 MCS10 MCS11 Down-link w/o 1024 QAM [%] 3 1 96 - w/ 1024 QAM [%] 2 91 Up-link 4 20 64 14 5 45 Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

18 Appendix C. Simulation Results for SISO (4)
May 2014 Appendix C. Simulation Results for SISO (4) Scenario MCS Portion Scenario 4 MCS0 MCS1 MCS2 MCS3 MCS4 MCS5 MCS6 MCS7 MCS8 MCS9 MCS10 MCS11 Down-link w/o 1024 QAM [%] 19 3 6 4 2 12 43 - w/ 1024 QAM [%] 7 33 Up-link 51 5 9 8 1 Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

19 Appendix C. Simulation Results for SISO (5)
May 2014 Appendix C. Simulation Results for SISO (5) Without 1024 QAM With 1024 QAM DL Tput [Mbps] UL Tput PER Res. PER Scenario1 22.4 32.7 2.81e-02 1.38e-03 27.4 + 22% 38.5 + 18% 4.07e-02 1.83e-03 Scenario2 14.2 26.8 9.60e-03 1.49e-04 17.7 + 25% 32.5 + 21% 1.99e-02 3.13e-04 Scenario3 4.20 12.9 5.55e-02 6.45e-04 5.05 + 20% 14.3 + 11% 6.81e-02 5.60e-04 Scenario4 16.5 23.0 1.89e-01 1.22e-02 18.3 23.2 + 1% Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

20 Appendix D. Simulation Results for STBC (1)
May 2014 Appendix D. Simulation Results for STBC (1) Scenario MCS Portion Scenario 1 MCS0 MCS1 MCS2 MCS3 MCS4 MCS5 MCS6 MCS7 MCS8 MCS9 MCS10 MCS11 Down-link w/o 1024 QAM [%] 100 - w/ 1024 QAM [%] 1 99 Up-link 3 96 2 91 Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

21 Appendix D. Simulation Results for STBC (2)
May 2014 Appendix D. Simulation Results for STBC (2) Scenario MCS Portion Scenario 2 MCS0 MCS1 MCS2 MCS3 MCS4 MCS5 MCS6 MCS7 MCS8 MCS9 MCS10 MCS11 Down-link w/o 1024 QAM [%] 100 - w/ 1024 QAM [%] Up-link 1 99 Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

22 Appendix D. Simulation Results for STBC (3)
May 2014 Appendix D. Simulation Results for STBC (3) Scenario MCS Portion Scenario 3 MCS0 MCS1 MCS2 MCS3 MCS4 MCS5 MCS6 MCS7 MCS8 MCS9 MCS10 MCS11 Down-link w/o 1024 QAM [%] 100 - w/ 1024 QAM [%] 1 98 Up-link 9 2 88 15 8 65 Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

23 Appendix D. Simulation Results for STBC (4)
May 2014 Appendix D. Simulation Results for STBC (4) Scenario MCS Portion Scenario 4 MCS0 MCS1 MCS2 MCS3 MCS4 MCS5 MCS6 MCS7 MCS8 MCS9 MCS10 MCS11 Down-link w/o 1024 QAM [%] 13 2 3 5 6 4 12 51 - w/ 1024 QAM [%] 7 40 Up-link 36 10 14 1 Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

24 Appendix D. Simulation Results for STBC (5)
May 2014 Appendix D. Simulation Results for STBC (5) Without 1024 QAM With 1024 QAM DL Tput [Mbps] UL Tput PER Res. PER Scenario1 22.9 35.3 8.36e-03 7.58e-06 28.5 + 24% 43.0 + 22% 1.61e-02 1.53e-05 Scenario2 14.3 27.4 6.32e-04 0.00 17.9 + 25% 34.1 2.91e-03 9.53e-06 Scenario3 4.26 14.6 3.29e-02 1.73e-05 5.28 16.6 + 12% 5.25e-02 5.31e-05 Scenario4 19.3 1.63e-01 7.84e-03 21.6 34.8 + 2% 1.64e-01 7.85e-03 Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

25 Appendix E. Simulation Results for SM (1)
May 2014 Appendix E. Simulation Results for SM (1) Scenario MCS Portion Scenario 1 MCS0 MCS1 MCS2 MCS3 MCS4 MCS5 MCS6 MCS7 MCS8 MCS9 MCS10 MCS11 Down-link w/o 1024 QAM [%] 2 98 - w/ 1024 QAM [%] 3 1 94 Up-link 14 75 11 5 59 Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

26 Appendix E. Simulation Results for SM (2)
May 2014 Appendix E. Simulation Results for SM (2) Scenario MCS Portion Scenario 2 MCS0 MCS1 MCS2 MCS3 MCS4 MCS5 MCS6 MCS7 MCS8 MCS9 MCS10 MCS11 Down-link w/o 1024 QAM [%] 1 3 94 - w/ 1024 QAM [%] 4 2 88 Up-link 12 76 10 62 Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

27 Appendix E. Simulation Results for SM (3)
May 2014 Appendix E. Simulation Results for SM (3) Scenario MCS Portion Scenario 3 MCS0 MCS1 MCS2 MCS3 MCS4 MCS5 MCS6 MCS7 MCS8 MCS9 MCS10 MCS11 Down-link w/o 1024 QAM [%] 1 2 4 3 16 69 - w/ 1024 QAM [%] 12 7 50 Up-link 6 9 24 20 8 Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

28 Appendix E. Simulation Results for SM (4)
May 2014 Appendix E. Simulation Results for SM (4) Scenario MCS Portion Scenario 4 MCS0 MCS1 MCS2 MCS3 MCS4 MCS5 MCS6 MCS7 MCS8 MCS9 MCS10 MCS11 Down-link w/o 1024 QAM [%] 44 5 6 8 7 4 2 10 1 13 - w/ 1024 QAM [%] Up-link 80 3 Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

29 Appendix E. Simulation Results for SM (5)
May 2014 Appendix E. Simulation Results for SM (5) Without 1024 QAM With 1024 QAM DL Tput [Mbps] UL Tput PER Res. PER Scenario1 44.6 62.6 3.98e-02 5.42e-04 53.9 + 21% 70.9 +13% 5.84e-02 6.17e-04 Scenario2 27.7 47.5 3.62e-02 2.61e-04 33.2 + 20% 54.2 +14% 5.39e-02 3.51e-04 Scenario3 7.39 17.8 7.09e-02 1.63e-04 8.36 + 13% 18.4 + 3% 7.14e-02 2.70e-04 Scenario4 18.0 17.2 2.56e-01 2.50e-02 18.9 + 5% + 0% Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

30 Appendix F. Simulation Results in Scenario 1 with High CCA Level (1)
May 2014 Appendix F. Simulation Results in Scenario 1 with High CCA Level (1) We compare the performance between with and without 1024 QAM in Scenario 1 by setting CCA level to -60dB as shown in [3]. SISO MCS Portion SISO MCS0 MCS1 MCS2 MCS3 MCS4 MCS5 MCS6 MCS7 MCS8 MCS9 MCS10 MCS11 Down-link w/o 1024 QAM [%] 2 1 3 4 12 71 - w/ 1024 QAM [%] 7 61 Up-link 10 8 6 18 38 27 Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

31 Appendix F. Simulation Results in Scenario 1 with High CCA Level (1)
May 2014 Appendix F. Simulation Results in Scenario 1 with High CCA Level (1) STBC MCS Portion STBC MCS0 MCS1 MCS2 MCS3 MCS4 MCS5 MCS6 MCS7 MCS8 MCS9 MCS10 MCS11 Down-link w/o 1024 QAM [%] 1 2 7 87 - w/ 1024 QAM [%] 6 3 78 Up-link 5 4 18 57 11 41 Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

32 Appendix F. Simulation Results in Scenario 1 with High CCA Level (1)
May 2014 Appendix F. Simulation Results in Scenario 1 with High CCA Level (1) SM MCS Portion SM MCS0 MCS1 MCS2 MCS3 MCS4 MCS5 MCS6 MCS7 MCS8 MCS9 MCS10 MCS11 Down-link w/o 1024 QAM [%] 2 1 5 7 3 21 52 - w/ 1024 QAM [%] 12 35 Up-link 6 8 13 18 10 Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

33 Appendix F. Simulation Results in Scenario 1 with High CCA Level (1)
May 2014 Appendix F. Simulation Results in Scenario 1 with High CCA Level (1) The additional MCS levels offer a throughput gain even in the case with high CCA level. Without 1024 QAM With 1024 QAM DL Tput [Mbps] UL Tput PER Res. PER SISO 36.8 39.7 7.94e-02 4.45e-03 42.2 + 15% 43.0 + 8% 8.97e-02 3.95e-03 STBC 41.5 49.3 5.33e-02 4.41e-04 49.2 + 19% 54.6 + 11% 6.78e-02 4.42e-04 SM 66.5 61.8 9.76e-02 2.44e-03 72.7 + 9% 64.3 + 4% 1.03e-01 2.17e-03 Eunsung Park, LG Electronics

Download ppt "Investigation on 1024 QAM feasibility in 11ax"

Similar presentations

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0802r0 Consideration on UL MU transmission Date: 2014-07-14 Slide 1Jinyoung Chun et. al, LG Electronics July 2014 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0802r0 Consideration on UL MU transmission Date: Slide 1Jinyoung Chun et. al, LG Electronics July 2014 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0868r0 July 2014 Johan Söder, Ericsson ABSlide 1 UL & DL DSC and TPC MAC simulations Date: 2014-07-14 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0868r0 July 2014 Johan Söder, Ericsson ABSlide 1 UL & DL DSC and TPC MAC simulations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0551r1 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 OBSS Preamble Detection Evaluation Date: 2015-05-11 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneEmail.

Doc.: IEEE /0551r1 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 OBSS Preamble Detection Evaluation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: 2014-07-14 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0050r0 January 2015 Yu Wang et al., EricssonSlide 1 Modeling components impacting throughput gain from CCAT adjustment.

Submission doc.: IEEE /0050r0 January 2015 Yu Wang et al., EricssonSlide 1 Modeling components impacting throughput gain from CCAT adjustment.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1443r0 SubmissionEsa Tuomaala Adapting CCA and Receiver Sensitivity Date: 2014-11-03 Authors: Slide 1 November 2014.

Doc.: IEEE /1443r0 SubmissionEsa Tuomaala Adapting CCA and Receiver Sensitivity Date: Authors: Slide 1 November 2014.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: 2014-11-03 NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneEmail.

Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: 2014-09-11 NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneEmail.

Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1227r3 SubmissionSlide 1 OFDMA Performance Analysis Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: Tianyu Wu etc. MediaTek Sept 2014 NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneEmail.

Doc.: IEEE /1227r3 SubmissionSlide 1 OFDMA Performance Analysis Date: Authors: Tianyu Wu etc. MediaTek Sept 2014 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0089r1 January 2015 Leonardo Lanante, Kyushu Inst. of Tech.Slide 1 MAC Efficiency Gain of Uplink Multi-user Transmission.

Submission doc.: IEEE /0089r1 January 2015 Leonardo Lanante, Kyushu Inst. of Tech.Slide 1 MAC Efficiency Gain of Uplink Multi-user Transmission.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0099 Submission Payload Symbol Size for 11ax January 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Date: 2015-01-12 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0099 Submission Payload Symbol Size for 11ax January 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1228r2 Submission Nov. 2014 Heejung Yu, Yeungnam Univ./NEWRACOM Issues on 256-FFT per 20MHz Date: 2014-11-03 Authors: Slide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /1228r2 Submission Nov Heejung Yu, Yeungnam Univ./NEWRACOM Issues on 256-FFT per 20MHz Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0048r0 Submission January 2015 Daniel Schneider, SonySlide 1 Non-Uniform Constellations for Higher Order QAMs Date: 2015/01/12 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0048r0 Submission January 2015 Daniel Schneider, SonySlide 1 Non-Uniform Constellations for Higher Order QAMs Date: 2015/01/12 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0046r0 Submission January 2015 Eisuke Sakai, Sony CorporationSlide 1 11aa GCR-BA Performance in OBSS Date: 2015/01/12 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0046r0 Submission January 2015 Eisuke Sakai, Sony CorporationSlide 1 11aa GCR-BA Performance in OBSS Date: 2015/01/12 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1228r0 Submission September 2014 xxx, NEWRACOM Issues on 256-FFT per 20MHz Date: 2014-09-14 Authors: Slide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /1228r0 Submission September 2014 xxx, NEWRACOM Issues on 256-FFT per 20MHz Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/0116r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. Al.Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: 2014-01-20 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail.

Doc.: IEEE /0116r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. Al.Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0099 Submission Payload Symbol Size for 11ax January 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Date: 2015-01-12 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0099 Submission Payload Symbol Size for 11ax January 2015 Ron Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0316r7 SubmissionHyeyoung Choi, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Power Save Calibration Date: 2015-05-11 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneEmail.

Doc.: IEEE /0316r7 SubmissionHyeyoung Choi, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Power Save Calibration Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-13/1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.:11-14-1199-01-00ax Submission Sept 2014 Slide 1 Effect of CCA in residential scenario part 2 Date: 2014-09-15 Authors:

Doc.: ax Submission Sept 2014 Slide 1 Effect of CCA in residential scenario part 2 Date: Authors:

Similar presentations

Ads by Google