1. Probing the Nucleus with Ultra-Peripheral Collisions Ultra-peripheral Collisions: What and Why Photoproduction as a nuclear probe STAR Results at 130 GeV/nucleon: Au + Au --> Au + Au +  0  0 production with nuclear excitation Direct  +  - production & interference A peek at 200 GeV/nucleon & beyond Conclusions Spencer Klein, LBNL (for the STAR Collaboration)

2. Coherent Interactions n b > 2R A; u no hadronic interactions u ~ 25-50 fermi at RHIC n Ions are sources of fields u photons F Z 2 u Pomerons or mesons (mostly f 0 ) F A 2 (bulk) A 4/3 (surface) u Fields couple coherently to ions  Photon/Pomeron wavelength = h/p> R A F amplitudes add with same phase F P  < h/R A, ~30 MeV/c for heavy ions  P || <  h/R A ~ 3 GeV/c at RHIC n Strong couplings --> large cross sections Au Coupling ~ nuclear form factor , P, or meson

3. Specific Channels n Vector meson production  A -- > ’   , , , J/ ,… A  Production cross sections -->  (VN)  Vector meson spectroscopy (  ,  ,  ,…) u Wave function collapse n Electromagnetic particle production   leptons,mesons u Strong Field (nonperturbative?) QED  Z  ~ 0.6  meson spectroscopy      ~ charge content of scalar/tensor mesons    is small for glueballs Production occurs in/near one ion  VM e + e -, qq,... ss Z  ~ 0.6; is N  > 1?

4. Exclusive  0 Production n One nucleus emits a photon n The photon fluctuates to a qq pair n The pair scatters elastically from the other nucleus n qq pair emerges as a vector meson  ~ 590 mb ~ 8 % of  AuAu at 200 GeV/nucleon u 120 Hz production rate at RHIC design luminosity , , ,  * rates at RHIC all > 5 Hz J/  ’,  *,  *, copiously produced,  a challenge Au 00  qq

5. Elastic Scattering with Soft Pomerons n Glauber Calculation u parameterized HERA data F Pomeron + meson exchange F all nucleons are the same   ~ A 2 (weak scatter limit) F All nucleons participate  J/    ~ A 4/3 (strong scatter limit) F Surface nucleons participate F Interior cancels (interferes) out   ~ A 5/3 (  0 ) depends on  (Vp) u sensitive to shadowing? Y = 1/2 ln(2k/M V ) RHIC - Au HERA data + Glauber Klein & Nystrand, 1999 HERA param.

6. Elastic Scattering with Hard Pomerons n Valid for cc or bb d  /dy &  depend on gluon distributions shadowing reduces mid-rapidity d  /dy u Effect grows with energy   reduced ~ 50% at the LHC n colored glass condensates may have even bigger effect Y = 1/2 ln(2k/M V ) RHIC - Au Leading Twist Calculation Frankfurt, Strikman & Zhalov, 2001 No shadowing Shadowed HERA param. d  /dy

7. Nuclear Excitation n Nuclear excitation ‘tag’s small b n Multiple photon exchange u Mutual excitation n Au* decay via neutron emission u simple, unbiased trigger n Multiple Interactions probable  P(  0, b=2R) ~ 1% at RHIC u P(2EXC, b=2R) ~ 30% n Non-factorizable diagrams are small for AA Au  P Au*  (1+) 00

8. Interaction Probabilities & d  /dy Excitation +  0 changes b distribution u alters photon spectrum F low --> high Baltz, Klein & Nystrand (2002) b [fm]  0 with Gold @ RHIC P(b) Exclusive - solid X10 for XnXn - dashed X100 for 1n1n - dotted  0 with gold @ RHIC d  /dy y

9. Photoproduction of Open Quarks  A --> ccX, bbX n sensitive to gluon structure function. n Higher order corrections problematic Ratio  (  A)/  (  p) --> shadowing u removes most QCD uncertainties n Experimentally feasible (?) u high rates u known isolation techniques Physics backgrounds are gg--> cc,  --> cc   cross section is small u gg background appears controllable by requiring a rapidity gap Production occurs in one ion QQ--> open charm  g

10. Interference n 2 indistinguishable possibilities u Interference!! n Similar to pp bremsstrahlung u no dipole moment, so u no dipole radiation n 2-source interferometer u separation b , , , J/  are J PC = 1 - - n Amplitudes have opposite signs  ~ |A 1 - A 2 e ip·b | 2 n b is unknown u For p T F destructive interference No Interference Interference         p T (GeV/c) y=0

11. Entangled Waveforms n VM are short lived u decay before traveling distance b n Decay points are separated in space-time F no interference u OR F the wave functions retain amplitudes for all possible decays, long after the decay occurs n Non-local wave function  non-factorizable:   +  -    +   - n Example of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox e+e+ e-e- J/  ++ -- b (transverse view) ++

14.  0 Analysis n Exclusive Channels   0 and nothing else F 2 charged particles F net charge 0 n Coherent Coupling   p T < 2h/R A ~100 MeV/c u back to back in transverse plane n Backgrounds: u incoherent photonuclear interactions u grazing nuclear collisions u beam gas interactions

15. Exclusive  0 n (prototype) trigger on 2 roughly back- to-back tracks u 30,000 events in ~ 9 hours n 2 tracks in interaction region u reject cosmic rays n peak for p T < 150 MeV/c     and      give background shape      pairs from higher multiplicity events have similar shape u scaled up by 2.1  high p T  0 ? asymmetric M  peak M(     ) Signal region: p T <0.15 GeV Preliminary p T <0.15 GeV  0 P T

16. ‘Minimum Bias’ Dataset n Trigger on neutron signals in both ZDCs n ~800,000 triggers n Event selection same as peripheral     and      model background n neutron spectrum has single (1n) and multiple (Xn) neutron components u Coulomb excitation u Xn may include hadronic interactions?  Measure  (1n1n) &  (XnXn) Preliminary  0 P T ZDC Energy (arbitrary units)

17. Direct  +  - production n The two processes interfere  180 0 phase shift at M(  0 )  changes  +  - lineshape good data with  p (HERA + fixed target)  +  - :   0 ratio should depend on  (  ):  (  A) u decrease as A rises? --  ++ --  A -- >  0 A -- >  +  - A  ++  A -- >  +  - A 00

18.  0 lineshape Fit to  0 Breit-Wigner +  +  - Interference is significant  +  - fraction is comparable to ZEUS ZEUS  p --> (  0 +  +  - )p e + e - and hadronic backgrounds STAR  Au --> (  0 +  +  - )Au* Preliminary M  d  /dM   mb/GeV  d  /dM   b/GeV  M 

19. dN/dy for  0 (XnXn)  d  /dy are different with and without breakup n XnXn data matches simulation n Extrapolate to insensitive region Nucl.Breakup Soft Pomeron, no-shadowing, XnXn After detector simulation

20. Cross Section Comparison n Normalized to 7.2 b hadronic cross section n Systematic uncertainties: luminosity, overlapping events, vertex & tracking simulations, single neutron selection, etc. Exclusive  0 bootstrapped from XnXn n Good agreement u factorization works Preliminary Baltz, Klein & Nystrand (2002)

21. A peek at the 2001 data n 200 GeV/nucleon  higher  s n higher luminosity n ‘Production’ triggers n Minimum Bias data: u 10X statistics n Topology Data u 50X statistics n Physics  precision  0  and p T spectra   (e + e - ) and theory comparison  4-prong events (  *(1450/1700)???)  0 spectra - 25% of the min-bias data

22. Conclusions RHIC is a high luminosity  and  A collider n Coherent events have distinctive kinematics n Photonuclear Interactions probe the nucleus   (AA --> AAV) is sensitive to  (VA) F probes gluon density (shadowing) n STAR has observed three peripheral collisions processes  Au + Au -- > Au + Au +  0  Au + Au -- > Au* + Au* +  0  The  0 :direct     is similar to gA nteractions The  0 cross sections agree with theoretical expectations