1. USG People 19th of November 2010 Second monitoring October 2010 Feedback of results “Evaluation activities in Leonardo da Vinci projects focus on the systematic preparation, checking and assessment of project activities and results.”

2. Second monitoring on: Products and results so far Project management Dissemination of the first results Piloting: walkthrough with representatives of the target group with at least ten students and two tutors a report of the use of the APL model with logbooks

3. Products and results so far Best practices: Encountered obstacles: bureaucratic delay, missing the necessary input, dependency other organizations Deadlines: CSCS: mid January 2011 ISQ: December 2010 De Sprengen: your answer seems to be about the APL procedure? Result of sharing: enrichment of views and knowledge, inspiration for youngsters: see commitment of other youngsters to their education

4. Products and results so far Project website: Usefulness: + Complete and chronological order of all project documents Missing information An English version of all the information that partners produce during the project

5. Project management Article by Zuidema. In December 2010 the International Agency will publicate an item about APL in juvenile prison in Newsline.

6. Dissemination of the 1st results De Sprengen communicated the best practice video Emanuele to: International course in Malta, 12 nationalities Presentation at the 1st meeting of the Dutch branche of the European Prison Education Association PI Zutphen, PI Achterhoek, PI Krimpen a/d IJssel Youngster council of the juvenile prison in Zutphen Number of reached people in the target group 120 youngsters Ways of dissemination in the own organisation Presentation of the youngstercouncil in Zutphen Several youngsters, seven will take part in the project Can you tell us how?

7. Dissemination of the 1st results ROC Aventus communicated the portfolio model to: 4 people from different departments of ROC Aventus Ways of dissemination in the own organisation Presentation for collegues who are involved in other international projects Training and Education department is interested What are they interested in? What could this mean for this project?

8. ISQ communicated the portfolio and the best practice from De Sprengen: Through the privilige network in Portugal to more than 200 people Number of reached people in the target group 23 youngsters in prison, of whom 10 participate in the project Ways of dissemination in the own organisation Newsletter for the website Project summary and link to the website Dissemination of the 1st results Prisoners?

9. CSCS communicated the general information of the project and the portfolio: To more than 150 VET organisations around Europe And spread the results of the project through the European Forum of Technical and Vocational Training (www.efvet.org)www.efvet.org Number of reached people in the target group 10 youngsters and maybe even 20 (suggestion of the director of the juvenile prison Ways of dissemination in the own organisation Information to all other members internally through weekly updates Contacts with social cooperatives Hosting a special link at the website next year Dissemination of the 1st results

10. Piloting - tasks Walkthrough and report Done by ISQ and De Sprengen CSCS will start testing in December 2010 with 10 youngsters and 2 tutors (1 CSCS, 1 prison) Logbooks weren’t made by the partners The report made adaptions possible and was an indication of mistakes

11. Piloting – involved people Numbers of representatives of the target group and tutors ISQ: 10 youngsters and 5 tutors De Sprengen: 8 persons Numbers and classification of people involved in the pilot ISQ: 1 prison, 10 youngsters, 5 tutors, 20 colleagues De Sprengen: 8 prisoners, 5 teachers, 2 managers, 1 person from the APL bureau Aventus, 2 persons from the educational department of ROC Aventus Can you specify?

12. Piloting - feedback Feedback prisoners ??? Feedback tutors Positive feedback: important project! But: uncertainty because it is new

13. Working methods There are no adjustments necessary in the working methods

14. Impact How the activities encouraged us since June Working with the portfolio and motivating youngsters is encouraging, since youngsters can actually take something home with them. How are training facilities in prisons improved through this project? Informatics in prison are improved by actualizing the software The conclusion of a course has become more flexible

15. Final monitoring Please note that the final monitoring (evaluation) will take place in the final months of the project, but not later than 31th March 2011. The monitoring is on: final products and results impact and dissemination components of the process.

16. Evaluation third meeting We will evaluate the process/this meeting You will receive this in week 47/48.