Download presentation
Published byCecil Jasper Hawkins Modified over 9 years ago
1
INTERPERSONALCOMMUNICATION IN CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS
Intimacy in Close Relationships Intimacy A state of “close union, contact, association, or acquaintance.” When college students were asked to identify their “closest, deepest, most involved relationship” 47% said their romantic partner 36% said a close friend 14% said a family member
2
Intimacy in Relationships
Dimensions of Intimacy Physical Intellectual Emotional Shared Activities
3
Intimacy in Relationships
Masculine and Feminine Styles Research shows that woman are somewhat more willing than men to share their feelings In terms of amount and depth: Female – Female were at the top Male – Female came in second Male – Male had the least disclosure Generalizations do not apply to every person Biological sex is not as important as the chosen gender role when expressing emotion
4
Intimacy in Relationships
Cultural Influences on Intimacy Notions of public and private selves have changed over time Collectivist cultures Generally do not reach out to outsiders, often waiting until they are properly introduced before entering into conversation Individualistic cultures Make fewer distinctions between personal relationships and casual ones
5
Intimacy in Relationships
Intimacy in Mediated Communication Studies show that intimacy may develop more quickly through mediated channels Instant messaging, ing and text messages offer more constant contact with friends, family and partners Communicators chose varying levels of self-disclosure
6
Intimacy in Relationships
The Limits of Intimacy It is impossible to have a close relationship with everyone Obsession with intimacy can lead to less satisfying relationships Intimacy is rewarding but it isn’t the only way of relating to others
7
Communication in Families
Characteristics of Family Communication Family communication is formative Family communication is role-driven Family communication is involuntary
8
Communication in Families
Characteristics of Family Communication Families as systems Family systems are interdependent Family systems are manifested through communication Family systems are nested Subsystems Suprasystems Families are more than the sum of their parts
9
Communication in Families
Communication Patterns within Families Conversation orientation High conversation orientation Low conversation orientation Conformity orientation High-conformity families Low-conformity families
10
Communication in Families
Communication Patterns within Families Consensual High conversation, high conformity Pluralistic High conversation, low conformity Protective Low conversation, high conformity Laissez-faire Low conversation, low conformity
11
Communication in Friendships
Types of Friendships Youthful vs. mature Long term vs. short term Relationship oriented vs. task oriented High disclosure vs. low disclosure High obligation vs. low obligation Frequent contact vs. occasional contact
12
Communication in Friendships
Sex, Gender, and Friendship Same-sex friendships Cross-sex friendships Mutual romance, strictly platonic, one partner desires romance, one partner rejects romance Friends with benefits
13
Communication in Friendships
Sex, Gender, and Friendship Gender considerations Sex role Sexual orientation
14
Communication in Friendships
Friendship and Social Media Internet has made friendship more complicated Social networking sites used primarily to maintain current friendships or to revive old ones Social media isn’t a replacement for face-to-face communication Means to support and rekindle friendships
15
Communication in Romantic Relationships
Ancient Greek Storge and philla Friendly love Pragma Practical, logical affinity Agape Selfless, altruistic compassion Mania Eros
16
Communication in Romantic Relationships
Romantic Turning Points Transformative events that alter the relationship Especially important in romantic relationships Often mark movement among stages Not all turning points are positive Can provide clues about the status of the relationship
17
Communication in Romantic Relationships
Couples’ Conflict Styles John Gottman – conflict styles Volatile Avoidant Validating
18
Communication in Romantic Relationships
Couples’ Conflict Styles Gary Chapman – love languages Words of affirmation Quality time Gifts Acts of service Physical touch Assumption your partner speaks same love language as you can be a setup for disappointment
19
Improving Close Relationships
Relationships Require Commitment Promise - sometimes implied, sometimes explicit – to remain in a relationship and make it successful Commitment formed and reinforced through communication Words aren’t surefire measure of commitment Deeds are also important
20
Improving Close Relationships
Relationships Require Maintenance and Support Relational maintenance strategies Positivity Openness Assurances Social networks Sharing tasks
21
Improving Close Relationships
Relationships Require Maintenance and Support Most used with family and friends Openness Social networks Most used with romantic partners Assurances
22
Improving Close Relationships
Relationships Require Maintenance and Support Social support Helping loved ones through challenging times Communication plays a central role Resources Emotional support Informational support Instrumental support
23
Repairing Damaged Relationships
Types of relational transgressions Lack of commitment Distance Disrespect Problematic emotions Aggression
24
Repairing Damaged Relationships
Relational transgressions Minor vs. significant Social vs. relational Deliberate vs. unintentional One-time vs. incremental
25
Repairing Damaged Relationships
Strategies for relational repair Talk about the violation Take responsibility for the transgression Components of apology Expressing regret Accepting responsibility Making restitution Genuinely repenting Requesting forgiveness
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.