1. Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism Questionnaire Third Evaluation Round Round

2. The questionnaire had 61 indicators in the First Evaluation Round In the Second Evaluation Round, the number of indicators increased to 83 In March, 2003, the Eighth Meeting of the Intergovernmental Working Group was held (Panama) 24 member countries participated Recommendation for a comprehensive reform of the MEM questionnaire agreed upon  Changes in 68 indicators  Elimination of 6 indicators  Incorporation of 7 new indicators Current questionnaire contains 86 indicators Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism Questionnaire Third Evaluation Round Round

3. CHAPTER I : INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING -7 Indicators National Anti-Drug Plan and National Commission (1-4) International Conventions (5) National Information System (6-7) CHAPTER II : DEMAND REDUCTION – 15 Indicators Prevention (8-11) Treatment (12-15) Statistics on Consumption (16-22) Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism Questionnaire Third Evaluation Round

4. CHAPTER III: SUPPLY REDUCTION – 17 INDICATORS Drug Production and Alternative Development (23-28)Drug Production and Alternative Development (23-28) Drug Supply and Control of Pharmaceutical Products and Chemical Substances (29-39)Drug Supply and Control of Pharmaceutical Products and Chemical Substances (29-39) CHAPTER IV: CONTROL MEASURES – 46 INDICATORS Illicit Drug Trafficking (40-48)Illicit Drug Trafficking (40-48) Corruption (49-50)Corruption (49-50) Firearms, Ammunition and Explosives (51-62)Firearms, Ammunition and Explosives (51-62) Money Laundering (63-83)Money Laundering (63-83) Displacement (84)Displacement (84) Transnational Organized Crime (85-86)Transnational Organized Crime (85-86) Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism Questionnaire Third Evaluation Round

5. NUMERIC SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE Comments were received from 15 countries and 5 CICAD sections Although not reflective of all 34 member states, the table does provide an initial snapshot trending to its modification and not its deletion Comments have been classified taking into account the action to take with regard to an indicator and the main reasons to modify or delete them according to the comments received Each of the questionnaire sections will be addressed in general terms by the section heads of CICAD Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism Questionnaire Third Evaluation Round

6. MEM UNIT MEM UNITPROPOSALS

7. REMOVE PURPOSE OF INDICATOR

8. INDICATORS ABOUT CIVIL LAW AND COMMON LAW PROCESS SHOULD BE UNIFIED

9. USE A STANDARD METHOD TO SEPARATE THOUSANDS AND DECIMALS

10. USE A STANDARD METHOD TO MEASURE AREAS AND WEIGHT

11. ELIMINATE INDICATOR SUBSECTIONS ASKING ABOUT EFFECTIVENESS

12. Update of the data base entry system to the MEM questionnaire Create a program so that the Experts could have access to statistical data, based on answers from the countries to the indicators of the 4th Round Format and Style of the redaction of the indicators will be reviewed and errors corrected FUTURE ACTIONS