Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBetty Norton Modified over 8 years ago
1
Floodplain Mapping using TINs Triangulated Irregular Networks (TINs) Representation of stream channels using TINs Floodplain delineation using HEC-HMS, HEC-RAS and ArcView
2
TIN with Surface Features Classroom Waller Creek UT Football Stadium
3
A Portion of the TIN
4
Input Data for this Portion Mass Points Soft Breaklines Hard Breaklines
5
TIN Vertices and Triangles
6
TIN Surface Model Waller Creek Street and Bridge
7
3-D Scene
8
3-D Scene with Buildings
9
Floodplain Mapping using TINs Triangulated Irregular Networks (TINs) Representation of stream channels using TINs Floodplain delineation using HEC-HMS, HEC-RAS and ArcView
10
River Modeling River hydraulic modeling provides a tool to study and gain understanding of hydraulic flow phenomena Topographic data describe the geometry of the simulated river system and permit the establishment of model topology HEC-RAS, MIKE 11 all hydraulic models require channel information for model development
11
River Morphology
12
Flood Inundation
13
Floodplain Delineation
15
Channel and Cross-Section Direction of Flow Cross-Section Channel
16
ProfileLines Types 1- Thalweg 2- LeftBank 3- RightBank 4- LeftFloodLine 5- RightFloodLine ProfileLines and CrossSections are linked through Channel_ID
17
TIN as a source of cross-sections
18
CrossSections
19
Elements of a Cross-Section Geometry Identifier Georeference Property Supplementary
20
Floodplain Mapping using TINs Triangulated Irregular Networks (TINs) Representation of stream channels using TINs Floodplain delineation using HEC-HMS, HEC-RAS and ArcView
21
Floodplain Mapping Approach CRWR-PrePro HEC-GeoRas Water surface profiles ArcView Geometric data Parameters Schematic Flow discharge HEC-HMSHEC-RAS
22
Purpose Integrate/Validate existing tools for floodplain determination and visualization. –Reduce the dependence on field data. –Improve the floodplain analyses capabilities (lower costs and more accuracy).
23
Digital Spatial Data ArcView HEC-RASHEC-HMS Digital elevation model (DEM). Stream definition.
24
CRWR-PrePro ArcView HEC-RASHEC-HMS Watershed delineation. Reach/Watershed parameters determination.
25
HEC-HMS: Flow Determination ArcView HEC-RASHEC-HMS
26
HMS-RAS Connection HMS JunctionsRAS Cross-sections ArcView HEC-RASHEC-HMS
27
HMS-RAS Connection ArcView HEC-RASHEC-HMS (0500, 3559.6) HMS Hydrograph RAS Flow Data
28
Digital Terrain Model: TIN ArcView HEC-RASHEC-HMS Observed points and breaklines for constructing a triangular irregular network (TIN).
29
Digital Terrain Model: TIN ArcView HEC-RASHEC-HMS Embedding Buildings into the TIN.
30
GIS-RAS Connection Stream centerline. Banks. Flow paths. Cross sections. ArcView HEC-RASHEC-HMS
31
GIS-RAS Connection Location of cross sections. ArcView HEC-RASHEC-HMS
32
Hydraulic Modeling with HEC-RAS RAS stream geometry. Cross-section extracted from the TIN. ArcView HEC-RASHEC-HMS
33
Hydraulic Modeling with HEC-RAS Resulting water elevations. ArcView HEC-RASHEC-HMS
34
Floodplain Mapping ArcView HEC-RASHEC-HMS Floodplain for 500 cfs.
35
Floodplain Mapping 2-D floodplain animation (500 – 5,000 cfs).
36
Floodplain Mapping 3-D floodplain animation.
37
Limitations Bridges/culverts: - depend on field data. - data input by hand.
38
Limitations The accuracy obtained from our TIN is not good enough.
39
Solutions New technologies (i.e. LADAR) are improving the quality of the digital terrain representations. Source: digital representation of NYC generated by ASI and published by ESRI. New technologies (i.e. LADAR) are improving the quality of the digital terrain representations.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.