1. SCDE Expanded ADEPT Advisory Team Meeting April 23, 2015

2. Connector: Using the four quadrant template in your packet, write 2-3 ideas for each section.

3. System Updates Expanded ADEPT

4. Guidelines: Key Changes Request “phase in” of implementation Spring-Summer 20152015-162016-17 Train induction and PK-5 continuing contract teachers train on SLO process. Induction teachers use Student Growth measures within their evaluation Annual contract teachers train on SLOs. PK-5 Continuing Contract teachers use Student Growth measures within their evaluation 6-12 Continuing Contract teachers train on SLOs Practice is measured using SAFE-T and one of the following rubrics: SAFE-T, SC Teaching Standards, Enhanced ADEPT or district developed aligned rubric. Annual Contract teachers use Student Growth measures within their evaluation. 6-12 Continuing Contract teachers use Student Growth measures within their evaluation. Practice evaluation TBD per procurement of statewide rubric.

5. Continuing Contract Teachers ADEPTYear 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5 Student Growth (SG) Prof. Growth & Development Plan Observations++++ Feedback Formal/Informal EvidenceGBE SAFE-T District Rating Levels4 Levels Reported to the State (with personally identifiable information (PII) 22222 Levels Reported without PII4 + + As required by the district and at the discretion of the principal.

6. Decision Matrix for Teacher Professional Practice Summative Rating on Professional Practice Unsatisfactory (U) Needs Improvement (NI) Proficient (P) Exemplary (E) 4 Domains 1UnsatisfactoryNeeds ImprovementProficientExemplary 2AnyNeeds ImprovementProficientExemplary 3AnyAny except UP or E 4AnyAny except UNI or P or EP or E South Carolina Educator Evaluation Summative Rating Decision Matrix Student Growth Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement ProficientExemplary Professional Practice Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Needs Improvement Proficient Exemplary Needs Improvement Proficient Exemplary SCDE evaluation model is not mathematically driven- an unweighted model

7. SLO Teacher Training Toolkit

8. Communications Bimonthly communications w/Action steps Consistent, Flexible, In Discussion Document Information Briefs – Updating, publishing Newsletter contributions to PSTA and SCEA

9. Advisory Group Structure Expanded ADEPT

10. Current Advisory Team Members Classroom Teachers: 7 Reading Coaches: 2 District Administrators: 4 Higher Education:2 -Principal Preparation: 1 -Teacher Preparation:1 Principals: 3 Assistant Principal: 1 Superintendent: 1 CERRA: 1 HR Administrators: 0 Professional Orgs.: 0 Instructional Coach: 1

11. Moving Forward Meetings held three times during the year * September, January, April/May Job-alike teams Breakout meetings for job-alike teams Existing Advisory Team members serve as lead for those teams

12. Role of the Advisory Team Feedback mechanism around Expanded ADEPT implementation Help identify and outline future work Provide feedback and make recommendations for system improvement

13. SLO Evaluator Training Review Work with your job-alike group to review the SLO Evaluator Training Content Provide feedback for improvement of training Whole group share-out : Plus, Delta, Questions

14. ADEPT Plans Expanded ADEPT

15. SLO Evaluator Training Expanded ADEPT

16. SLO Evaluator Training Logistics Collaboration with OSL, TAP One day training- skill building format 5 regional locations for 3 consecutive days (9 district teams daily = 27 district teams in each location Firm cap on participants- 9 teams plus 10 IHE/other spots Dates: June (2 locations, 6 days) July (1 location, 3 days) Early August (1 location, 3 days) Early September (1 location, 3 days) District teams (train the trainers) of 6: Central Office ADEPT coordinator 3 Principals (one from each level) Mentor Coordinator

17. Next Steps: Q & A Expanded ADEPT