1. Cambridgeshire School Improvement Board Achievement of Vulnerable Groups 1 st February 2016 1

2. Percentage achieving a good level of development 201320142015 14-15 Direction of Travel 13-15 Direction of Travel All Pupils (7340 pupils)51.061.365.9 55  15 Boys (3781 pupils)43.452.658.9 66  16 Girls (3559 pupils)59.169.972.9 33  14 FSM (Jan Census) (699 pupils)31.541.242.9 22  11 Non-FSM (Jan Census) (6641 pupils)53.864.368.1 44  14 Any SEN (484 pupils)10.615.916.7 11 66 Non-SEN (6856 pupils)54.365.669.1 44  15 Home Language: English (5450 pupils)53.563.967.6 44  14 Home Language: Central/Eastern European (455) 23.741.251.4  10  28 Home Language: Other than English (1073 pupils) 34.346.558.5  12  24 Combined FSM & Any SEN (104 pupils)9.68.311.5 33 22 Combined Non-FSM & Non-SEN (6098 pupils) 56.266.871.7 55  16 Source: DfE SFR 39/2014 released 16 October 2014 and Cambridgeshire internal data

3. Percentage Achieving L4+ R, W & M 201320142015 Direction of Travel 13/14 Direction of Travel 14/15 Change since 2013 All Pupils (6240 pupils) (An increase of 93 pupils) 71.975.977.8 44 22 66 Boys (3195 pupils) (+17) 68.274.174.2 66- 66 Girls (3045 pupils) (+76) 75.877.981.6 22 44 66 FSM (Jan Census) (687 pupils) (+29) 46.751.253.1 55 22 66 Non-FSM (Jan Census) (5452 pupils) (-37) 75.278.981.4 44 33 66 FSM-6 (1277 pupils) (+25) 53.056.160.5 33 44 88 Non-FSM-6 (4862 pupils) (+102 – there are less unknown pupils) 77.081.182.9 44 22 66 Any SEN (1144 pupils) (-169 pupils) 27.930.431.2 33 11 33 Non-SEN (5043 pupils) (+209 pupils) 85.688.588.7 22- 33 Home Language: English (5500 pupils) (-76) 73.076.178.4 33 22 55 Home Language: Central/Eastern European (246) (+43) 47.951.765.9 44  14  18 Home Language: Other than English (682 pupils) (+111) 63.670.275.5 77 55  12 Combined FSM Jan & Any SEN (257 pupils) (-60) 15.823.518.9 88 55 33 Combined Non-FSM Jan & Non-SEN (4569 pupils) (+108) 86.189.490.4 33 11 44 Note. 2015 figures are Provisional (Nexus). Percentage point changes have been rounded. See next slide

4. Percentage Achieving 5+ GCSE grades A*-C including English and Maths (First Entry) PROVISIONAL 20142015 Direction of Travel 14/15 All Pupils (5804 pupils) 55.958.0 22 Boys (3023 pupils) 50.652.6 22 Girls (2781 pupils) 61.663.8 22 FSM-6 (1100 pupils) 31.329.9 11 Non-FSM-6 (4703 pupils) 61.364.5 33 Any SEN (1099 pupils) 21.120.8 - Non-SEN (4705 pupils) 65.266.6 11 Home Language: English (5344 pupils) 56.558.3 22 Home Language: Other than English (460 pupils) 48.754.2 66 Note. 2015 figures are Provisional (Nexus). Percentage point changes have been rounded.

5. Analysis of pupils who failed to reach the expected level at KS2 in 2013 “The 1659”

6. Defining the cohort 1659 4281 “The 1659” – pupils who failed to achieve L4+ in reading, writing & maths at KS2 in 2013 Pupils who achieved L4+ in reading, writing & maths at KS2 in 2013 The 2013 KS2 cohort – the 5940 pupils who took the KS2 tests in 2013 Complicating factors  Some pupils live outside Cambridgeshire  School Census data is not available for all pupils  Fisher Family Trust data is not available for all pupils 27.9% of all pupils are in the 1659

7. 8 out of 10 SEN/FSM pupils are in the 1659 SENSEN/FSMSEN/BMEBMEBME/FSMFSMSEN/BME/ FSM KS2 Cohort 9232491527196728250 The 1659627206106133277042 % of total68%83%70%18%36%25%84% England ‘1659’ cohort 66%71%65%27%36%40%68% (27.9% of all pupils are in the 1659 in Cambridgeshire) Worse Better

8. Size might matter – pupils attending smaller schools did better*  A smaller proportion of pupils in smaller schools are in the 1659  Pupils attending larger primary schools are over-represented * Excludes Special schools

9. Comparing rates, there are twice as many pupils in the 1659 open to social care* compared to Cambridgeshire  Eight of the 1659 were looked after by Cambridgeshire in May 2013, a rate of 48.2 per 10,000. The Cambridgeshire LAC rate was 36.0 at the same time  A further 20 had been looked after by Cambridgeshire previously  Six were subject to a Child Protection Plan in May 2013 with one more having had a previous plan. This is a rate of 30.1 per 10,000, again almost double the Cambridgeshire rate at the time of 15.4 *Includes LAC and CP, all need codes (including disability)  87 (5%) were open to Children’s Social Care* in May 2013, more than double the Cambridgeshire CIN rate  A further 288 (17%) had a previous involvement with Children’s Social Care*. Nearly a quarter of the 1659 had current or previous involvement with Children’s Social Care

10. Is it to do with the performance in SEND? Children are no more likely to have a statement / plan in Cambs than elsewhere. SEND makes more of an impact than FSM. Children with a statement / plan do about as well as elsewhere. Children with SEND but no statement / plan do worse than elsewhere. There is a stronger correlation between funding and achievement of SEND with no statement / plan than with disadvantage.

11. SEND makes more impact than FSM… and compared to national, the gaps are bigger in Cambridgeshire 79% of all pupils are non FSM and non SEN 73% of all pupils are non FSM and non SEN

12. 12 Not Published Source: DfE LAIT and SFRs 2014.

13. 13 Not Published Source: DfE LAIT and SFRs 2014.

14. Stronger correlation between funding and achievement of SA/SA+ pupils than disadvantage Source: