1. Outline ‘Urgent action’ statement ARL/CLIR survey Portico LOCKSS/CLOCKSS An Australian JSTOR?

2. Urgent action “Urgent action needed to preserve scholarly journals” statement September 2005 Wide endorsement in North America

3. Approach 1 Preservation of e-journals is a kind of insurance Not necessarily a form of access

4. Approach 2, 3 Preservation archives should provide a minimal set of well-defined services Libraries must invest in a qualified archiving solution

5. Approach 4 Libraries must demand archival deposit by publishers as part of licensing agreements CEIRC model license implications

6. ARL e-journal preservation survey Article by Kenney [www.clir.org/pubs/archives/ejournal.htm] ARL commission to CLIR, working with Cornell Preservation programs by not for profits Peer reviewed journal literature in electronic form

7. Programs Ten across US, Australia, Canada, Germany, Netherlands Evaluation study to examine where library directors invest and why Report in August 2006

8. Portico = JSTOR Electronic Archiving Initiative About preservation of born digital Provides mechanism for ingest and preservation of electronic-only

9. JSTOR vs Portico JSTOR about wide access Portico about insurance – ‘trigger events’ which may lead to loss of access But JSTOR builds and maintains Portico delivery system

10. Membership Libraries –Sign archive license agreement –Annual archive fee –25% reduction for 5 years for archives founders in 2006 and 2007 –Based on material spend Publishers –Archival agreement with Portico –Fee –OUP and Elsevier in

11. LOCKSS/CLOCKSS LOCKSS –Local storage of subscribed content –No take up in Australia/NZ? CLOCKS –Community based, beyond subscribed –Research project –Dark archive –Participation closed

12. Australian JSTOR? What has been digitised QULOC efforts