Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Whither dynamic congestion management ? IREP Symposium 2004 Cortina d’Ampezzo (Italy) Louis WEHENKEL – Université de Liège.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Whither dynamic congestion management ? IREP Symposium 2004 Cortina d’Ampezzo (Italy) Louis WEHENKEL – Université de Liège."— Presentation transcript:

1 Whither dynamic congestion management ? IREP Symposium 2004 Cortina d’Ampezzo (Italy) Louis WEHENKEL – Université de Liège

2 Outline The proposal Static congestion management  Dynamic congestion management Some arguments in favor of Dynamic CM  Immediate vs. delayed actions  Multiple solutions of SCOPF based static CM  Market power, gaming  Sub-optimality of static CM Feasibility and needs for research

3 Congestion management  Real-time decision making by system operators to maintain system security above minimum maintain system security above minimum minimize economic impact minimize economic impact avoid discrimination and market bias avoid discrimination and market bias  Remarks time step typically of 15 to 30 minutes time step typically of 15 to 30 minutes objectives monitored over a longer term objectives monitored over a longer term

4 Static CM  Problem formulation At time k, compute decision u k to satisfy instantaneous security constraints and satisfy instantaneous security constraints and minimize instantaneous costs minimize instantaneous costs Given x k, select u k in U(x k ) to minimize c k (x k, u k )  Notation k : discrete time index (say 15 minutes time step) x k : electrical state vector at time k (estimated) u k : decision variables at time k (to determine) c k (x,u) : instantaneous cost function, U(x) : constraints on decision variables  NB: Constraints U(x) include feasibility and all kinds of security constraints deemed relevant (N, N-1, static, dynamic…)

5 Dynamic CM  Problem formulation (Assuming a state transition model : x k+1 = f(x k, u k,, w k ) ) (Assuming a state transition model : x k+1 = f(x k, u k,, w k ) ) At time k, compute a sequence of decisions At time k, compute a sequence of decisions (u k, u k+1,…, u k+T-1 ) to satisfy security constraints andsatisfy security constraints and minimize cost induced over the whole time interval (k, k+T-1)minimize cost induced over the whole time interval (k, k+T-1)  Remarks Apply u k and refresh the sequence at the next time step Apply u k and refresh the sequence at the next time step Time step of 5 to 30 minutes Time step of 5 to 30 minutes Time horizon T of several hours to a few days Time horizon T of several hours to a few days (and we neglect faster dynamics) (and we neglect faster dynamics)

6 Argument/Question No1  Dynamic Congestion Management can in principle reach a better security/cost tradeoff (over the long term) than static congestion management Would savings be significant ?

7 Argument/Question No2  In dynamic CM one can include constraints and/or penalization terms to allocate impact on market participants in a non discriminating way (whatever that means…) allocate impact on market participants in a non discriminating way (whatever that means…) fight against gaming and market power fight against gaming and market power What is the impact of this on the overall security/cost tradeoff ?

8 Computational feasibility ? Try to combine existing model-based tools SCOPF, DSA, DSE SCOPF, DSA, DSE with stochastic optimization and approximation techniques to solve stochastic dynamic programming problem Can be used on-line or off-line

9 Grazie mille


Download ppt "Whither dynamic congestion management ? IREP Symposium 2004 Cortina d’Ampezzo (Italy) Louis WEHENKEL – Université de Liège."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google