Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAdele Newman Modified over 8 years ago
1
Model Overview Application of CALSIM II to Friant System
2
CALSIM Development for USJRBI, Phase I Incorporate Real-time Operational Decision Logic for Operation of Millerton Lake Water supply allocation based on available water supply –Class 1, Class 2, and 215 water allocation made in March and updated monthly through end of June –Monthly use of Class 1 and Class 2 are dynamic based on availability of Class 2 and 215 water Flood operation based on seasonal runoff –Water supply forecast used in February and updated monthly through end of June to target filling Millerton by end of June –Pre-release for snowmelt runoff are made each month from February through May
3
Monthly Delivery Adjustment Forecasted Snowmelt Release Monthly Delivery Pattern Annual Class 2 Allocation Annual Class 1 Allocation Annual Water Supply Forecast Water Supply Allocation Procedure Initial Monthly Delivery Rain Flood Release 215 Water Allocation Annual Delivery Monthly Delivery
4
Model Validation Model Validation Compare Model Simulation to Historical Operation Findings: – Model adequately mimics historical operation – Model simulation provides “benchmark” for comparative analysis
5
Model Validation Plots Annual Total Canal Delivery Annual Madera Canal Delivery Annual Friant-Kern Canal Delivery 1952-1961 Monthly Millerton Operation 1952-1961 Monthly Canal Diversions 1962-1971 Monthly Millerton Operation 1962-1971 Monthly Canal Diversions 1972-1981 Monthly Millerton Operation 1972-1981 Monthly Canal Diversions 1982-1991 Monthly Millerton Operation 1982-1991 Monthly Canal Diversions 1992-1994 Monthly Millerton Operation 1992-1994 Monthly Canal Diversions
6
Conclusion Model adequately mimics historical operation Model simulation provides “benchmark” for comparative analysis
7
End
8
Annual Total Canal Delivery Most differences are explainable
9
Annual Madera Canal Delivery
10
Annual Friant-Kern Canal Delivery
11
Rerouted Flood Flow to Madera Canal – Fresno River
12
1952-1961 Monthly Millerton Operation
13
1952-1961 Monthly Canal Diversions
14
1962-1971 Monthly Millerton Operation
15
1962-1971 Monthly Canal Diversions
16
1972-1981 Monthly Millerton Operation
17
1972-1981 Monthly Canal Diversions
18
1982-1991 Monthly Millerton Operation
19
1982-1991 Monthly Canal Diversions
20
1992-1994 Monthly Millerton Operation
21
1992-1994 Monthly Canal Diversions
22
Annual Water Supply Forecast Water Supply Volume Available for Delivery = + Beginning of Month Storage + Inflow (through September) - Canal Loss (through September) - Minimum River Release (through September) - Evaporation Estimate (through September) - Carryover Target (end of September) Updated Monthly From March Through June
23
Annual Class 1 Allocation Minimum of Water Supply Volume Available for Delivery Water Supply Volume Available for Delivery 800,000 AF 800,000 AF Updated Monthly From March Through June
24
Annual Class 2 Allocation Minimum of Water Supply Volume Available for Delivery Water Supply Volume Available for DeliveryMinus Class 1 Allocation Class 1 Allocation Spill forecast Spill forecast 1,400,000 AF 1,400,000 AF Updated Monthly From March Through June for Spills Adjusted for Wetness in Tulare Basin
25
Monthly Delivery Pattern Patterns are developed based on deliveries from 1982-1997 4 Sets of Monthly Patterns 1.Total Friant-Kern Canal 2.Friant-Kern Canal Class 1 3.Total Madera Canal 4.Madera Canal Class 1 CALSIM uses annual delivery allocation to select pattern Class 2 Pattern is the Difference Between Total and Class 1
26
Historical Total Delivery Pattern
27
Historical Class 1 Delivery Pattern
28
Total Delivery Patterns
29
Class 1 Delivery Patterns
30
Snowmelt Release Forecast Volume of Friant release, above Class 1 and Class 2, to be made with the target of filling by the end of June Spill volume is spread throughout spring, the pattern of release is based on spill volume Updated Monthly From February Through June Snowmelt Release Volume = + March 1 Storage + Inflow (through June) - Canal Loss (through June) - Minimum River Release (through June) - Evaporation Estimate (through June) - Maximum Millerton capacity -Canal Delivery
31
Delivery Adjustment Friant-Kern Canal Class 2 delivery is reduced based on Tulare Basin wetness – Natural Flow of Tule River is used as wetness indicator Madera Canal delivery is reduced based on Madera Canal service area demands
32
215 Water Allocation Allocation is made only when Friant will spill for Rain flood or pre-release for snowmelt 215 water will not be allocated when delivery is reduced due to basin wetness 215 demand is 1,200 cfs for Friant-Kern Canal 215 demand is 100 cfs for Madera Canal
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.