Download presentation
1
Shape-Dependent Gloss Correction
Peter Vangorp Philip Dutré Department of Computer Science Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
2
Gloss Perception Shape influences gloss perception [Vangorp et al. 2007]
3
Gloss Perception Shape influences gloss perception [Vangorp et al. 2007]
4
Same material, different gloss perception
Shape influences gloss perception Same material, different gloss perception
5
Corrected material, same gloss perception
Shape influences gloss perception Corrected material, same gloss perception
6
Gloss Perception Shape influences gloss perception
Bumpiness influences gloss perception [Ho et al. 2008]
7
Overview Perceptual Experiment Statistical Analysis
Application: Gloss Correction
8
Stimulus Images Shape Material Differential rendering [Debevec 1998]
Natural illumination [Fleming et al. 2003]
9
Stimulus Images Shape 5 well-known 3D models
Size-independent statuettes and abstract shapes S1: Blob S2: Buddha S3: Bunny S4: Dragon S5: Sphere
10
Stimulus Images Material Neutral light grey plastic
Perceptually uniform gloss variations [Pellacini et al. 2000] Adaptive to diffuse color G1 G2 G3 G4 G5
11
Which object is more glossy?
12
Experimental Procedure
Training session 75 image pairs Same shape, only gloss difference Understanding of the term “glossy” Main experiment 325 image pairs (20 minutes) Shape and gloss difference 16 participants No difference between experienced and others
13
Cue Combination Simultaneous sensory cues Cue combination function
Physical gloss G Physical shape S Cue combination function Perceived gloss = f(G,S) Decision variable D = f(Gleft,Sleft) – f(Gright,Sright) + e D > 0 if left image looks more glossy than right
14
Decision Variable Ideal observer Right image Left image
15
Decision Variable Ideal observer Right image Left image
16
Decision Variable Ideal observer Right image Left image
17
Decision Variable Ideal observer Right image Left image
18
Decision Variable Ideal observer Right image Left image
19
Decision Variable Ideal observer Right image Left image
20
Decision Variable Ideal observer Right image Left image
21
Decision Variable Ideal observer Right image Left image
22
Decision Variable Experimental data Right image Left image
23
Decision Variable Experimental data Right image Left image
24
Cue Combination Simplest model for perceived gloss f(G,S)
Interaction between G and S Independent of S Additive influence of G and S Full interaction Linearity of G component [Pellacini et al. 2000] Linear Non-linear
25
Cue Combination 6 models for f(G,S)
26
Cue Combination 6 models for f(G,S) Full Additive Independent
27
Cue Combination 6 models for f(G,S) Non-linear Linear
28
Cue Combination 6 models for f(G,S)
29
Cue Combination 6 models for f(G,S)
30
Cue Combination 6 models for f(G,S)
31
Cue Combination 6 models for f(G,S)
32
Cue Combination Non-linear, additive model for f(G,S) Non-linear
curve Additive offset bunny dragon blob buddha sphere
33
Gloss Correction Change shape Vertical Horizontal Jump curves
Physical gloss Horizontal Perceptual gloss
34
Gloss Correction Change shape Vertical Horizontal Jump curves
Physical gloss Horizontal Perceptual gloss starting point
35
without gloss correction
Change shape Jump curves Vertical Physical gloss Horizontal Perceptual gloss starting point shape change without gloss correction
36
without gloss correction
Change shape Jump curves Vertical Physical gloss Horizontal Perceptual gloss starting point shape change without gloss correction
37
without gloss correction
Change shape Jump curves Vertical Physical gloss Horizontal Perceptual gloss starting point shape change with gloss correction shape change without gloss correction
38
without gloss correction
Change shape Jump curves Vertical Physical gloss Horizontal Perceptual gloss starting point shape change with gloss correction shape change without gloss correction
39
Examples Uncorrected
40
Examples Corrected
41
Examples Uncorrected
42
Examples Corrected
43
Examples bunny dragon blob buddha sphere
44
Examples bunny dragon blob buddha sphere Uncorrected:
45
Examples bunny dragon blob buddha sphere Corrected:
46
Non-linearity Perceptually uniform gloss variations [Pellacini et al. 2000] Contrast gloss c Distinctness-of-image gloss d Additional experiments
47
d c and d Material c
48
Distinctness-of-image gloss d
Non-linearity Low end of contrast gloss c Main experiment c and d Contrast gloss c Distinctness-of-image gloss d
49
Examples: contrast gloss
bunny dragon blob buddha sphere Uncorrected:
50
Examples: contrast gloss
bunny dragon blob buddha sphere Corrected c:
51
Examples: DOI gloss bunny dragon blob buddha sphere Uncorrected:
52
Examples: DOI gloss bunny dragon blob buddha sphere Corrected d:
53
Conclusions and Future Work
Influence of shape on gloss perception Simple model Application Gloss Correction Generalization Any shape, viewpoint, and illumination
54
Questions?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.