1. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 1 Operations Management Chapter 4 - Forecasting Chapter 4 - Forecasting © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render Principles of Operations Management, 6e Operations Management, 8e

2. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 2 Outline  Global Company Profile: Tupperware Corporation  What Is Forecasting?  Forecasting Time Horizons  The Influence of Product Life Cycle  Types Of Forecasts

3. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 3 Outline – Continued  The Strategic Importance Of Forecasting  Human Resources  Capacity  Supply-Chain Management  Seven Steps In The Forecasting System

4. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 4 Outline – Continued  Forecasting Approaches  Overview of Qualitative Methods  Overview of Quantitative Methods

5. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 5 Outline – Continued  Time-series Forecasting  Decomposition of a Time Series  Naïve Approach  Moving Averages  Exponential Smoothing  Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment  Trend Projections  Seasonal Variations in Data  Cyclical Variations in Data

6. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 6 Outline – Continued  Associative Forecasting Methods: Regression And Correlation Analysis  Using Regression Analysis to Forecast  Standard Error of the Estimate  Correlation Coefficients for Regression Lines  Multiple-Regression Analysis

7. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 7 Outline – Continued  Monitoring And Controlling Forecasts  Adaptive Smoothing  Focus Forecasting  Forecasting In The Service Sector

8. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 8 Learning Objectives When you complete this chapter, you should be able to : Identify or Define:  Forecasting  Types of forecasts  Time horizons  Approaches to forecasts

9. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 9 Learning Objectives When you complete this chapter, you should be able to : Describe or Explain:  Moving averages  Exponential smoothing  Trend projections  Regression and correlation analysis  Measures of forecast accuracy

10. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 10 Forecasting at Tupperware  Each of 50 profit centers around the world is responsible for computerized monthly, quarterly, and 12-month sales projections  These projections are aggregated by region, then globally, at Tupperware’s World Headquarters  Tupperware uses all techniques discussed in text

11. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 11 Tupperware’s Process

12. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 12 Forecast by Consensus  Although inputs come from sales, marketing, finance, and production, final forecasts are the consensus of all participating managers  The final step is Tupperware’s version of the “jury of executive opinion”

13. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 13 What is Forecasting?  Process of predicting a future event  Underlying basis of all business decisions  Production  Inventory  Personnel  Facilities ??

14. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 14  Short-range forecast  Up to 1 year, generally less than 3 months  Purchasing, job scheduling, workforce levels, job assignments, production levels  Medium-range forecast  3 months to 3 years  Sales and production planning, budgeting  Long-range forecast  3 + years  New product planning, facility location, research and development Forecasting Time Horizons

15. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 15 Distinguishing Differences  Medium/long range forecasts deal with more comprehensive issues and support management decisions regarding planning and products, plants and processes  Short-term forecasting usually employs different methodologies than longer-term forecasting  Short-term forecasts tend to be more accurate than longer-term forecasts

16. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 16 Types of Forecasts  Economic forecasts  Address business cycle – inflation rate, money supply, housing starts, etc.  Technological forecasts  Predict rate of technological progress  Impacts development of new products  Demand forecasts  Predict sales of existing product

17. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 17 Strategic Importance of Forecasting  Human Resources – Hiring, training, laying off workers  Capacity – Capacity shortages can result in undependable delivery, loss of customers, loss of market share  Supply-Chain Management – Good supplier relations and price advance

18. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 18 Seven Steps in Forecasting  Determine the use of the forecast  Select the items to be forecasted  Determine the time horizon of the forecast  Select the forecasting model(s)  Gather the data  Make the forecast  Validate and implement results

19. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 19 The Realities!  Forecasts are seldom perfect  Most techniques assume an underlying stability in the system  Product family and aggregated forecasts are more accurate than individual product forecasts

20. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 20 Forecasting Approaches  Used when situation is vague and little data exist  New products  New technology  Involves intuition, experience Qualitative Methods

21. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 21 Forecasting Approaches  Used when situation is ‘stable’ and historical data exist  Existing products  Current technology  Involves mathematical techniques Quantitative Methods

22. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 22 Overview of Qualitative Methods  Jury of executive opinion  Pool opinions of high-level executives, sometimes augment by statistical models  Delphi method  Panel of experts

23. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 23 Overview of Qualitative Methods  Sales force composite  Estimates from individual salespersons are reviewed for reasonableness, then aggregated  Consumer Market Survey  Ask the customer

24. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 24  Involves small group of high-level managers  Group estimates demand by working together  Combines managerial experience with statistical models  Relatively quick  ‘Group-think’ disadvantage Jury of Executive Opinion

25. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 25 Sales Force Composite  Each salesperson projects his or her sales  Combined at district and national levels  Sales reps know customers’ wants  Tends to be overly optimistic

26. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 26 Delphi Method  Iterative group process, continues until consensus is reached  3 types of participants  Decision makers  Staff  Respondents Staff (Administering survey) Decision Makers (Evaluate responses and make decisions) Respondents (People who can make valuable judgments)

27. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 27 Consumer Market Survey  Ask customers about purchasing plans  What consumers say, and what they actually do are often different  Sometimes difficult to answer

28. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 28 Overview of Quantitative Approaches 1.Naive approach 2.Moving averages 3.Exponential smoothing 4.Trend projection 5.Linear regression Time-Series Models Associative Model

29. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 29  Set of evenly spaced numerical data  Obtained by observing response variable at regular time periods  Forecast based only on past values  Assumes that factors influencing past and present will continue influence in future Time Series Forecasting

30. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 30 Trend Seasonal Cyclical Random Time Series Components

31. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 31 Components of Demand Demand for product or service |||| 1234 Year Average demand over four years Seasonal peaks Trend component Actual demand Random variation Figure 4.1

32. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 32  Persistent, overall upward or downward pattern  Changes due to population, technology, age, culture, etc.  Typically several years duration Trend Component

33. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 33  Regular pattern of up and down fluctuations  Due to weather, customs, etc.  Occurs within a single year Seasonal Component Number of PeriodLengthSeasons WeekDay7 MonthWeek4-4.5 MonthDay28-31 YearQuarter4 YearMonth12 YearWeek52

34. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 34  Repeating up and down movements  Affected by business cycle, political, and economic factors  Multiple years duration  Often causal or associative relationships Cyclical Component 05101520

35. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 35  Erratic, unsystematic, ‘residual’ fluctuations  Due to random variation or unforeseen events  Short duration and nonrepeating Random Component MTWTFMTWTFMTWTFMTWTF

36. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 36 Naive Approach  Assumes demand in next period is the same as demand in most recent period  e.g., If May sales were 48, then June sales will be 48  Sometimes cost effective and efficient

37. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 37  MA is a series of arithmetic means  Used if little or no trend  Used often for smoothing  Provides overall impression of data over time Moving Average Method Moving average = ∑ demand in previous n periods n

38. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 38 January10 February12 March13 April16 May19 June23 July26 Actual3-Month MonthShed SalesMoving Average (12 + 13 + 16)/3 = 13 2 / 3 (13 + 16 + 19)/3 = 16 (16 + 19 + 23)/3 = 19 1 / 3 Moving Average Example 101213 (10 + 12 + 13)/3 = 11 2 / 3

39. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 39 Graph of Moving Average ||||||||||||JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND||||||||||||JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND Shed Sales 30 30 – 28 28 – 26 26 – 24 24 – 22 22 – 20 20 – 18 18 – 16 16 – 14 14 – 12 12 – 10 10 – Actual Sales Moving Average Forecast

40. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 40  Used when trend is present  Older data usually less important  Weights based on experience and intuition Weighted Moving Average Weighted moving average = ∑ (weight for period n) x (demand in period n) ∑ weights

41. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 41 January10 February12 March13 April16 May19 June23 July26 Actual3-Month Weighted MonthShed SalesMoving Average [(3 x 16) + (2 x 13) + (12)]/6 = 14 1 / 3 [(3 x 19) + (2 x 16) + (13)]/6 = 17 [(3 x 23) + (2 x 19) + (16)]/6 = 20 1 / 2 Weighted Moving Average 101213 [(3 x 13) + (2 x 12) + (10)]/6 = 12 1 / 6 Weights AppliedPeriod 3Last month 2Two months ago 1Three months ago 6Sum of weights

42. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 42 Moving Average And Weighted Moving Average 30 30 – 25 25 – 20 20 – 15 15 – 10 10 – 5 5 – Sales demand ||||||||||||JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND||||||||||||JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND Actual sales Moving average Weighted moving average Figure 4.2

43. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 43  Form of weighted moving average  Weights decline exponentially  Most recent data weighted most  Requires smoothing constant (  )  Ranges from 0 to 1  Subjectively chosen  Involves little record keeping of past data Exponential Smoothing

44. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 44 Exponential Smoothing New forecast =last period’s forecast +  (last period’s actual demand – last period’s forecast) F t = F t – 1 +  (A t – 1 - F t – 1 ) whereF t =new forecast F t – 1 =previous forecast  =smoothing (or weighting) constant (0    1)

45. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 45 Exponential Smoothing Example Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs Actual demand = 153 Smoothing constant  =.20

46. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 46 Exponential Smoothing Example Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs Actual demand = 153 Smoothing constant  =.20 New forecast= 142 +.2(153 – 142)

47. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 47 Exponential Smoothing Example Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs Actual demand = 153 Smoothing constant  =.20 New forecast= 142 +.2(153 – 142) = 142 + 2.2 = 144.2 ≈ 144 cars

48. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 48 Impact of Different  225 225 – 200 200 – 175 175 – 150 150 – |||||||||123456789123456789|||||||||123456789123456789 Quarter Demand  =.1 Actual demand  =.5

49. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 49 Choosing  The objective is to obtain the most accurate forecast no matter the technique We generally do this by selecting the model that gives us the lowest forecast error Forecast error= Actual demand - Forecast value = A t - F t

50. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 50 Common Measures of Error Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) MAD = ∑ |actual - forecast| n Mean Squared Error (MSE) MSE = ∑ (forecast errors) 2 n

51. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 51 Common Measures of Error Mean Absolute Percent Error (MAPE) MAPE = 100 ∑ |actual i - forecast i |/actual i n n i = 1

52. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 52 Comparison of Forecast Error RoundedAbsoluteRoundedAbsolute ActualForecastDeviationForecastDeviation Tonnagewithforwithfor QuarterUnloaded  =.10  =.10  =.50  =.50 118017551755 2168176817810 31591751617314 417517321669 51901731717020 62051753018025 7180178219313 818217841864 84100

53. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 53 Comparison of Forecast Error RoundedAbsoluteRoundedAbsolute ActualForecastDeviationForecastDeviation Tonagewithforwithfor QuarterUnloaded  =.10  =.10  =.50  =.50 118017551755 2168176817810 31591751617314 417517321669 51901731717020 62051753018025 7180178219313 818217841864 84100 MAD = ∑ |deviations| n = 84/8 = 10.50 For  =.10 = 100/8 = 12.50 For  =.50

54. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 54 Comparison of Forecast Error RoundedAbsoluteRoundedAbsolute ActualForecastDeviationForecastDeviation Tonagewithforwithfor QuarterUnloaded  =.10  =.10  =.50  =.50 118017551755 2168176817810 31591751617314 417517321669 51901731717020 62051753018025 7180178219313 818217841864 84100 MAD10.5012.50 = 1,558/8 = 194.75 For  =.10 = 1,612/8 = 201.50 For  =.50 MSE = ∑ (forecast errors) 2 n

55. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 55 Comparison of Forecast Error RoundedAbsoluteRoundedAbsolute ActualForecastDeviationForecastDeviation Tonagewithforwithfor QuarterUnloaded  =.10  =.10  =.50  =.50 118017551755 2168176817810 31591751617314 417517321669 51901731717020 62051753018025 7180178219313 818217841864 84100 MAD10.5012.50 MSE194.75201.50 = 45.62/8 = 5.70% For  =.10 = 54.8/8 = 6.85% For  =.50 MAPE = 100 ∑ |deviation i |/actual i n i = 1

56. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 56 Comparison of Forecast Error RoundedAbsoluteRoundedAbsolute ActualForecastDeviationForecastDeviation Tonnagewithforwithfor QuarterUnloaded  =.10  =.10  =.50  =.50 118017551755 2168176817810 31591751617314 417517321669 51901731717020 62051753018025 7180178219313 818217841864 84100 MAD10.5012.50 MSE194.75201.50 MAPE5.70%6.85%

57. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 57 Trend Projections Fitting a trend line to historical data points to project into the medium-to-long-range Linear trends can be found using the least squares technique y = a + bx ^ where y= computed value of the variable to be predicted (dependent variable) a= y-axis intercept b= slope of the regression line x= the independent variable ^

58. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 58 Least Squares Method Time period Values of Dependent Variable Figure 4.4 Deviation 1 Deviation 5 Deviation 7 Deviation 2 Deviation 6 Deviation 4 Deviation 3 Actual observation (y value) Trend line, y = a + bx ^

59. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 59 Least Squares Method Time period Values of Dependent Variable Figure 4.4 Deviation 1 Deviation 5 Deviation 7 Deviation 2 Deviation 6 Deviation 4 Deviation 3 Actual observation (y value) Trend line, y = a + bx ^ Least squares method minimizes the sum of the squared errors (deviations)

60. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 60 Least Squares Method Equations to calculate the regression variables b =  xy - nxy  x 2 - nx 2 y = a + bx ^ a = y - bx

61. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 61 Least Squares Example b = = = 10.54 ∑xy - nxy ∑x 2 - nx 2 3,063 - (7)(4)(98.86) 140 - (7)(4 2 ) a = y - bx = 98.86 - 10.54(4) = 56.70 TimeElectrical Power YearPeriod (x)Demandx 2 xy 1999174174 20002794158 20013809240 200249016360 2003510525525 2004614236852 2005712249854 ∑x = 28∑y = 692∑x 2 = 140∑xy = 3,063 x = 4y = 98.86

62. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 62 Least Squares Example b = = = 10.54  xy - nxy  x 2 - nx 2 3,063 - (7)(4)(98.86) 140 - (7)(4 2 ) a = y - bx = 98.86 - 10.54(4) = 56.70 TimeElectrical Power YearPeriod (x)Demandx 2 xy 1999174174 20002794158 20013809240 200249016360 2003510525525 2004614236852 2005712249854  x = 28  y = 692  x 2 = 140  xy = 3,063 x = 4y = 98.86 The trend line is y = 56.70 + 10.54x ^

63. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 63 Least Squares Example ||||||||| 199920002001200220032004200520062007 160 160 – 150 150 – 140 140 – 130 130 – 120 120 – 110 110 – 100 100 – 90 90 – 80 80 – 70 70 – 60 60 – 50 50 – Year Power demand Trend line, y = 56.70 + 10.54x ^

64. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 64 Least Squares Requirements 1.We always plot the data to insure a linear relationship 2.We do not predict time periods far beyond the database 3.Deviations around the least squares line are assumed to be random

65. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 65 Associative Forecasting Used when changes in one or more independent variables can be used to predict the changes in the dependent variable Most common technique is linear regression analysis We apply this technique just as we did in the time series example

66. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 66 Associative Forecasting Forecasting an outcome based on predictor variables using the least squares technique y = a + bx ^ where y= computed value of the variable to be predicted (dependent variable) a= y-axis intercept b= slope of the regression line x= the independent variable though to predict the value of the dependent variable ^

67. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 67 Associative Forecasting Example SalesLocal Payroll ($000,000), y($000,000,000), x 2.01 3.03 2.54 2.02 2.01 3.57 4.0 – 3.0 – 2.0 – 1.0 – |||||||01234567|||||||01234567 Sales Area payroll

68. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 68 Associative Forecasting Example Sales, y Payroll, xx 2 xy 2.0112.0 3.0399.0 2.541610.0 2.0244.0 2.0112.0 3.574924.5 ∑y = 15.0∑x = 18∑x 2 = 80∑xy = 51.5 x = ∑x/6 = 18/6 = 3 y = ∑y/6 = 15/6 = 2.5 b = = =.25 ∑xy - nxy ∑x 2 - nx 2 51.5 - (6)(3)(2.5) 80 - (6)(3 2 ) a = y - bx = 2.5 - (.25)(3) = 1.75

69. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 69 Associative Forecasting Example 4.0 – 3.0 – 2.0 – 1.0 – |||||||01234567|||||||01234567 Sales Area payroll y = 1.75 +.25x ^ Sales = 1.75 +.25(payroll) If payroll next year is estimated to be $600 million, then: Sales = 1.75 +.25(6) Sales = $325,000 3.25

70. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 70  How strong is the linear relationship between the variables?  Correlation does not necessarily imply causality!  Coefficient of correlation, r, measures degree of association  Values range from -1 to +1 Correlation

71. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 71 Correlation Coefficient r = n  xy -  x  y [n  x 2 - (  x) 2 ][n  y 2 - (  y) 2 ]

72. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 72 Correlation Coefficient r = n∑xy - ∑x∑y [n∑x 2 - (∑x) 2 ][n∑y 2 - (∑y) 2 ] y x (a)Perfect positive correlation: r = +1 y x (b)Positive correlation: 0 < r < 1 y x (c)No correlation: r = 0 y x (d)Perfect negative correlation: r = -1

73. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 73  Coefficient of Determination, r 2, measures the percent of change in y predicted by the change in x  Values range from 0 to 1  Easy to interpret Correlation For the Nodel Construction example: r =.901 r 2 =.81

74. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 74 Multiple Regression Analysis If more than one independent variable is to be used in the model, linear regression can be extended to multiple regression to accommodate several independent variables y = a + b 1 x 1 + b 2 x 2 … ^ Computationally, this is quite complex and generally done on the computer

75. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 75 Multiple Regression Analysis y = 1.80 +.30x 1 - 5.0x 2 ^ In the Nodel example, including interest rates in the model gives the new equation: An improved correlation coefficient of r =.96 means this model does a better job of predicting the change in construction sales Sales = 1.80 +.30(6) - 5.0(.12) = 3.00 Sales = $300,000

76. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 76  Measures how well the forecast is predicting actual values  Ratio of running sum of forecast errors (RSFE) to mean absolute deviation (MAD)  Good tracking signal has low values  If forecasts are continually high or low, the forecast has a bias error Monitoring and Controlling Forecasts Tracking Signal

77. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 77 Monitoring and Controlling Forecasts Tracking signal RSFEMAD= = ∑(actual demand in period i - forecast demand in period i)  ∑|actual - forecast|/n)

78. © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 78 Tracking Signal Tracking signal + 0 MADs – Upper control limit Lower control limit Time Signal exceeding limit Acceptable range