Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAlannah Quinn Modified over 8 years ago
1
Megan Logue
2
Is a.1 M or a 1 M solution of sodium hydroxide more effective at extracting carbon dioxide from air? Will carbon dioxide be removed from air more effectively by sodium hydroxide at 16°C or 32°C?
3
The increasing amount of CO 2 in the Earth’s atmosphere has the potential to severely harm the environment and affect society. The purpose of carbon capture is to remove CO 2 that would otherwise build up in the atmosphere. One method of carbon capture is the implementation of artificial trees in the environment. ◦ An artificial tree operates by enabling air to filter through its structure and removing the air’s CO 2 with a sorbent material, such as sodium hydroxide, or NaOH. The initial pH value of a solution of NaOH will decrease as it captures CO 2 from air. This change in pH can be used to determine exactly how many molecules of CO 2 are extracted from air over a period of time.
4
http://a57.foxnews.com/images/590838/450/350/0_22_synthetic_trees_400.jpg
5
A solution of NaOH and water can be used to extract CO 2 from air. The reaction between a solution of NaOH and CO 2 is as follows: ◦ CO 2 + H 2 O H 2 CO 3 ◦ NaOH + H 2 CO 3 NaHCO 3 + H 2 O ◦ NaHCO 3 + NaOH Na 2 CO 3 + H 2 O Overall reaction: ◦ CO 2 + 2 NaOH = Na 2 CO 3 + H 2 O This indicates that for every two moles of NaOH, one mole of CO 2 is extracted from air.
6
As the concentration of the NaOH solution increases, the amount of CO 2 removed will increase as well. Also, as the temperature of the system increases, the amount of CO 2 extracted from the air will also increase.
7
2 L of 1 M solution of NaOH 2 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks 2 100 mL graduated cylinders 2 aquarium pumps 2 stirring rods Small weights Water bath Incubator 2 Vernier pH probes 2 Vernier temperature probes Logger Pro Date Logger Computer Water Paper towels Safety gloves Safety goggles Safety apron Calculator Sink
8
A.1 M solution of NaOH and a 1 M solution of NaOH were prepared in separate Erlenmeyer flasks. Both flasks were placed in the water bath set at 20°C. A tube connected to an aquarium pump, a Vernier temperature probe, and a Vernier pH probe were placed in each flask. The probes were set to collect samples at increments of 10 minutes over a time period of 24 hours with Logger Pro Data Logger. After 24 hours, the collected data was recorded. The procedure at 20°C was repeated twice to perform a total of three trials. Next, an incubator was set at 40°C. The.1 M and 1 M solutions of NaOH were placed in the incubator. A tube connected to an aquarium pump, a Vernier temperature probe, and a Vernier pH probe, were placed in each flask. Once the temperature of each flask was stable at 40°C, the data collection was promptly started on Logger Pro Data Logger. After 24 hours, the collected data was recorded. The procedure at 40°C was repeated twice to perform a total of three trials. After each trial was successfully completed, the changes in the pH of the solutions over time were calculated. Mathematical models were used to determine the amount of CO 2 molecules extracted from the air and removed by each solution. The final results of the experiment were compared and analyzed.
9
Independent Variables ◦ Temperature ◦ Concentration of NaOH solution Dependent Variable ◦ Amount of CO 2 removed Constants ◦ Erlenmeyer flasks, aquarium pumps, Vernier temperature probes, Vernier pH probes, stirring rods, small weights, Logger Pro Data Logger, computer
10
Average Decrease in pH at 16°CAverage Decrease in pH at 32°C
11
The following calculation was used to determine the grams of CO 2 removed by each NaOH solution: 1 M at 16°C - Trial 3 pH = -log[H 3 O + ] Initial pH: 13.02 [H 3 O + ] = 10 -13.02 = 9.54992586 x 10 -14 [OH - ] = 1.0 x 10 -14 / [ H 3 O + ] =.1047128548 End pH: 10.26 [H 3 O + ] = 10 -10.26 = 5.49540874 x 10 -11 [OH - ] = 1.0 x 10 -14 / [ H 3 O + ] = 1.8201385 x 10 -4 Initial [OH - ] – End [OH - ] = (5.49540874 x 10 -11 ) – (1.8201385 x 10 -4 ) Initial [OH - ] – End [OH - ] =.104530841 mol OH - removed mol OH - removed / 2 =.104530841 / 2 =.0522654205 mol CO 2 removed 1 mol CO 2 = 44g 44g x mol CO 2 removed = 44 x.0522654205 = 2.299678502g CO 2 removed by 100 mL of.1 M NaOH at 16°C
13
Stabilizing temperature Limited materials Evaporation of the NaOH solutions over the 24-hour time period Time restrictions
14
At 16°C, the.1 M NaOH solutions were more effective than the 1 M solutions. At 32°C, the.1 M solutions produced similar results, but the 1 M solutions removed more molecules of CO 2. The final results suggested that the 1 M solutions were more effective at 32°C. This refutes the hypothesis that the CO 2 extracted would increase as the concentration of the NaOH solution increased. It was also hypothesized that the CO 2 extracted would increase as the temperature of the system increased. This was rejected for the.1 M solutions but accepted for the 1 M solutions. Lower concentrations of NaOH are likely to be more effective at cooler temperatures, and greater concentrations of NaOH at warmer temperatures. Further Research ◦ Cost-effectiveness, carbon disposal and storage, different concentrations of NaOH solutions
15
Climate Change Information Sheet 22 [Information sheet]. (2011). Retrieved October 17, 2011, from United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change website: http://unfccc.int/_background/background_publications_htmlpdf/_change_information_kit//.p hp 8 Extreme Solutions to Global Warming. (2009, December 4). Retrieved February 28, 2012, from Fox News Network website: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,579373,00.html General Overview: The Greenhouse Effect. (2002). Retrieved September 17, 2011, from University of California, San Diego website: http://earthguide.ucsd.edu///_1.shtml Greenhouse Gas Emissions. (2011, April 20). Retrieved October 11, 2011, from United States Environmental Protection Agency website: http://www.epa.gov///.html Greenhouse Gases. (2011, April 12). Retrieved October 16, 2011, from United States Energy Administration website: http://www.eia.gov//.cfm?page=environment_about_ghg Health and Environmental Effects. (2007). Retrieved October 16, 2011, from United States Environmental Protection Agency website: http://epa.gov/imatechange//.html IPPC Working Group II. (2007). Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (M. Parry, O. Canziani, J. Palutikof, P. van der Linden, & C. Hanson, Eds.). (Original work published 2007) Retrieved from http://www.ipcc.ch/_and_data/_ipcc_fourth_assessment_report_wg2_report_impacts_adaptatio n_and_vulnerability.htm Lackner, K. S., Grimes, P., & Ziock, H. (n.d.). Capturing Carbon Dioxide From Air. Retrieved from National Enregy Technology Laboratory website: http://www.netl.doe.gov////_seq/.pdf Lenntech Index. (2009). Retrieved October 23, 2011, from Lenntech website: http://www.lenntech.com/.htm Ophardt, C. E. (2003). Virtual ChemBook. Retrieved October 22, 2011, from Elmherst College website: http://www.elmhurst.edu/~chm//.html
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.