Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMagnus Tucker Modified over 8 years ago
1
DMAP: integrated mobility and service management in mobile IPv6 systems Authors: Ing-Ray Chen Weiping He Baoshan Gu Presenters: Chia-Shen Lee Xiaochen Ding
2
Outline Introduction Related Work DMAP Model Numerical Results Applicability and Conclusion
3
Introduction MIPv6 - Mobile IPv6 A version of mobile IP, it allows an IPv6 node to be mobile and still maintain existing connections; HMIPv6 - Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Proposed enhancement of MIPv6, it is designed to reduce the amount of signaling required and to improve handoff speed for mobile connections; MAP – Mobility Anchor Point Serving as a local entity to aid in mobile handoffs, it can be located anywhere within a hierarchy of routers;
4
Introduction HA - home agent A router on a mobile node’s home network that maintains information about the device’s current location, as identified in its CoA; CoA - care of address A temporary IP address for a mobile node that enables message delivery when the device is connecting from somewhere other than its home network; Location handoff Mobile node moves across a subnet boundary; Service handoff Mobile node moves across a DMAP domain boundary;
5
Related Work MIP-RR MIP Regional Registration, uses a Gateway Foreign Agent to provide a regional CoA, which acts as a proxy for regional movement management; The design is for mobility management only without considering service management-induced network cost.
6
Related Work Hierarchical MIPv6 In HMIPv6, a regional CoA (RCoA) is allocated to a mobile node, in addition to a CoA, whenever the mobile node enters a new MAP domain; MAPs in HMIPv6 are statically configured and shared by all mobile nodes in the system; There is no mechanism provided to determine the size of a MAP domain in HMIPv6 for all mobile nodes that would minimize the network cost.
7
Related Work IDMP It introduces the concept of domain mobility with a domain and a domain agent to keep track of CoA of a mobile node as the mobile node roams within a domain; It can be combined with fast handoff mechanisms utilizing multicasting to reduce handoff latency and paging mechanisms to reduce the network signaling cost for intra-domain movements.
8
DMAP The essence of DMAP is the notion of integrated mobility and service management, which is achieved by determining an optimal service area size; The objective is to minimize the total network signaling and communication overhead in servicing the mobile node’s mobility and service management operations;
9
DMAP Inter-regional move The mobile node makes the AR of the subnet as the DMAP when it crosses a service area, and it also determines the size of the new service area; MN acquires a RCoA as well as a CoA from the current subnet and registers the address pair to the current DMAP in a binding request message;
10
DMAP Inter-regional move The MN also informs the HA and CNs of the new RCoA address change in another binding message so that the HA and CNs would know the MN by its new RCoA address; DMAP intercepts the packet destined for RCoA, inspects the address pair stored in the internal table, finds out MN’s CoA and forwards the packet to the MN through tunneling;
11
DMAP Intra-regional move When the MN subsequently crosses a subnet but is still located within the service area, it would inform the MAP of the CoA address change without informing the HA and CNs to reduce the network signaling cost;
12
DMAP
13
A MN’s service area can be modeled as consisting of K IP subnets; The MN appoints a new DMAP only when it crosses a service area whose size is determined based on the mobility and service characteristics of the MN in the new service area; The service area size of the DMAP is not necessarily uniform;
14
DMAP A large service area size means that the DMAP will not change often, while a small service area size means that the DMAP will be changed often so it will stay close to the MN; There is a trade-off between two cost factors and an optimal service area exists;
15
DMAP The service and mobility characteristics of a MN are summarized by two parameters: The resident time that the MN stays in a subnet, represented by using the MN’s mobility rate σ; The service traffic between the MN and server applications, represented by using the data packet rate λ; The ratio of λ/ σ is called the service to mobility ratio (SMR) of the MN;
16
Model We devise a computational procedure to determine the optimal service area size The intent to find the optimal service area based on the MN’s mobility and service behaviors The computational procedure requires Every AR must be capable of acting as a MAP Each MN must be powerful enough to collect data dynamically and perform simple statistical analysis
17
Model We aim to minimize the communication cost The signaling overhead for mobility management for informing the DMAP of the CoA changes Informing the HA and CNs of the RCoA changes The communication overhead for service management for delivering data packets between the MN and CNs Our SPN model is shown later
18
Model SymbolMeaning λ Data packet rate between the MN and CNs σMobility rate at which the MN moves across subnet boundaries SMRService to mobility ratio (λ/σ) NNumber of server engaged by the MN F(K)F(K)A general function relating the number of subnets K to the number of hops
19
Model SymbolMeaning KNumber of subnets in one service area τ1-hop communication delay per packet in wired networks αAverage distance between HA and MAP βAverage distance between CN and MAP γCost ratio between wireless vs. wired network
20
Stochastic Petri Net Moves tmp Xs MoveNewDMAP MN2DMAP K K A B Pi=1 Pj=1 (Guard:Mark(Xs)=K-1) (Guard:Mark(Xs)<K-1) (Guard:Mark(Xs)=K) A token represents a subnet crossing event by the MN
21
Stochastic Petri Net-Places Moves tmp Xs MoveNewDMAP MN2DMAP K K A B Pi=1 Pj=1 (Guard:Mark(Xs)=K-1) (Guard:Mark(Xs)<K-1) (Guard:Mark(Xs)=K) Mark(Moves)=1 means that the MN just moves aross a subnet A temporary place holds tokens from transition A Mark(Xs) holds the number of subnets crossed in a service area
22
Stochastic Petri Net-Transitions Moves tmp Xs MoveNewDMAP MN2DMAP K K A B Pi=1 Pj=1 (Guard:Mark(Xs)=K-1) (Guard:Mark(Xs)<K-1) (Guard:Mark(Xs)=K) A timed transition for the MN to move across subnet areas A timed transition for the MN to inform the DMAP of the CoA change A timed transition for the MN to inform the HA and CNs of the RCoA change A guard for transition B that is enabled if a move will cross a service area A guard for transition A that is enabled if a move will not cross a service area
23
Transition Rate MN2DMAP Wireless one-hop communication delay per packet The number of hops between the current subnet and the DMAP seperated by Mark(Xs)+1 subnets
24
Transition Rate NewDMAP The communication cost includes that for the MN to inform the HA and CNs of the new RCoA change The average distance in hops between the MN and the HA via wired network The average distance in hops between the MN and N CNs via wired network
25
Cost of Service Management P i : The steady-state probability that the system is found to contain i tokens in place Xs such that Mark(Xs)=i C i,service : The communication overhead for the network to service a data packet when MN is in the i-th subnet in the service area A delay between the DMAP and a CN in the fixed network A delay from DMAP to the AR of the MN’s current subnet in the fixed network A delay in the wireless link form the AR to the MN
26
Cost of Location Management C i,location : The network signaling overhead to service a location handoff operation given the MN is in the i-th subnet in the service area If i < K Only a minimum signaling cost will incurred for the MN to inform the DMAP of the CoA address change If i = K The location handoff also triggers a service handoff A service handoff will incur higher communication signaling cost to inform the HA and N CNs of the RCoA address change
27
Cost of Location Management A location handoff and a service handoff A minimum signaling cost for the MN to inform the DMAP of the CoA address change
28
Cost of DMAP Summarizing above, the total communication cost per time unit for the Mobile IP network operating under our DMAP scheme to service operations associated with mobility and service management of the MN is calculated as: Service management cost Mobility management cost
29
Numerical Results We calculate CDMAP as a function of K and determine the optimal K K represents the optimal “service area” size The size will minimize the network cost given A set of parameter values charactering the MN’s mobility and service behaviors We present results to show that There exists an optimal service area under DMAP Demonstrate the benefit of DMAP over basic MIPv6 and HMIPv6
30
Numerical Results MIPv6 A delay in the wireless link from the AR to the MN A communication delay from the CN to the AR of the current subnet A delay in the wireless link from the MN to the AR of the subnet that it just enters into A delay from that AR to the HA A delay from that AR to the CNs
31
Numerical Results HMIPv6 The placement of MAPs is predetermined Each MAP covers a fixed number of subnets K H = 4 A MN crosses a subnet within a MAP It only informs the MAP of its CoA A MN crosses a MAP Changes the MAP Obtain a new RCoA Informs the HA and CNs of the new RCoA
32
Numerical Results Comparing DMAP with basic MIPv6 and HMIPv6 head-to-head from the perspective of K opt
33
Numerical Results Cost difference between basic MIPv6, HMIPv6, and DMAP
34
Numerical Results Effect of α and β on CHMIPv6 − CDMAP
35
Numerical Results Effect of F(k) on CHMIPv6 − CDMAP
36
Applicability and Conclusion We proposed a novel DMAP scheme for integrated mobility and service management To apply the analysis results in the paper, one can execute the computational procedure at static time to determine optimal K opt over a possible range of parameter values In the future, we plan to consider the implementation issue by building a testbed system to validate the analytical results as well as testing the sensitivity of the results with respect to other time distributions other than the exponential distribution used in the analysis
37
Q & A
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.