Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAldous Willis Modified over 9 years ago
1
American Government and Organization PS1301 Wednesday, 29 October
2
How do people decide? The Michigan Model (prospective model) Party identification Candidate characteristics Issue positions
3
Influence of Party Id
4
Requirements for Issue Voting Aware of the issue Care about the issue Perceive difference between the candidates Correct about the difference
5
Criteria for Issue Voting
7
Dynamics of 2000 Presidential Campaign Source: Johnston and Hagen (APSA 2003) “Priming and Learning: Evidence from the 2000 Annenberg Study”
8
Character
9
Perception of Gore’s Honesty
10
Traits of Candidates
11
Retrospective Voting Party identification Evaluation of the past economic indicators economic indicators Wars WarsIncumbency
12
Race and Gender
13
Religion Bush Gore Nader
14
Education and Income
15
Unions and Religion Bush Gore Nader
17
How do Presidential Elections and Congressional Elections Differ? Presidential elections are more salient The average voter has more information about the presidential candidates than congressional candidates. Consequently, party identification may play a lesser role in pres. elections Voters are more inclined to be influenced by personal/candidate characteristics and issue voting may be more prevalent.
18
Congressional Elections The empirical evidence suggests that party labels are have a greater effect when information about the candidate is low U.S. Rep U.S. Rep State Senator State Senator St. Assy. St. Assy. County Board County Board
19
Congressional Elections Decline in party id means that other cues become more important Incumbency Name recognition
20
Rise of Split Ticket Voting
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.