Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySharlene Price Modified over 9 years ago
1
Yulan Li, Tsinghua Uni. TILC08, 3-6 March, 2008, Sendai, Japan Performance Study of TU-TPC Prototype Using Cosmic-ray Tsinghua University TPC group CDC group: » KEK » Saga University Yulan Li Tsinghua University
2
Yulan Li, Tsinghua Uni., TILC08, 3-6 March, 2008, Sendai, Japan Scheme of TU-TPC prototype Readout detector: triple-GEM, CERN standard GEM foils, 10 cm 10cm; Drift length: 50 cm
3
Yulan Li, Tsinghua Uni., TILC08, 3-6 March, 2008, Sendai, Japan High voltage distribution R_GEM Drift strip: fPCB, width, 2 mm, Pitch, 5 mm R_GEM: variable, to match the surface potential of the top GEM foil
4
Yulan Li, Tsinghua Uni., TILC08, 3-6 March, 2008, Sendai, Japan The prototype: photograph
5
Yulan Li, Tsinghua Uni., TILC08, 3-6 March, 2008, Sendai, Japan Prototype: readout pad Readout pad: size, 9.5 mm 1.5 mm (Pitch: 10 mm 1.6 mm), staggered 10 x 62 pads placed, only 10 x 32 pads read out due to the limitation of electronic channel number.
6
Yulan Li, Tsinghua Uni., TILC08, 3-6 March, 2008, Sendai, Japan Whole system DAQ of MDC for BESIII, IHEP, Beijing
7
Yulan Li, Tsinghua Uni., TILC08, 3-6 March, 2008, Sendai, Japan TU-TPC Studies @ KEK Cryo center, KEK Nov.29 - Dec.25, 2007 B=1T Analysis package: DoubleFit Test conditions: Gas V GEM (V) E drift (V/cm) Garfield Simulation Value V drift (cm/ s)C d ( m/ cm) P10370134.65.5129 P10370122.15.4122 Ar:Iso:CF 4 =94:3:3265145.25.480.3 Ar:Iso:CF 4 =94:3:3260123.54.781.8 Some modification: 1.cosmic-ray trigger system: Large crystal: 50 cm 15 cm PMT: fine mesh, R5924 2.R_GEM moved outside of chamber
8
Yulan Li, Tsinghua Uni., TILC08, 3-6 March, 2008, Sendai, Japan TU-TPC Studies @ KEK (Cont.)
9
Yulan Li, Tsinghua Uni., TILC08, 3-6 March, 2008, Sendai, Japan TU-TPC Studies @ KEK (Cont.)
10
Yulan Li, Tsinghua Uni., TILC08, 3-6 March, 2008, Sendai, Japan Pad Response Pad Response : the average fraction of charge falling on a given pad, as function of the distance between the track and the pad center for different z regions Middle 6 rows are used in the following analysis
11
Yulan Li, Tsinghua Uni., TILC08, 3-6 March, 2008, Sendai, Japan Transverse Diffusion Constant C D Pad response @ z=0
12
Yulan Li, Tsinghua Uni., TILC08, 3-6 March, 2008, Sendai, Japan C D -Comparison MP-TPC@KEK ★ ★ TU-TPC Gas: Ar:Iso:CF 4 =94:3:3, B=1T Ref: http://www-hep.phys.saga-u.ac.jp/ILC-TPC
13
Yulan Li, Tsinghua Uni., TILC08, 3-6 March, 2008, Sendai, Japan x resolution – P10 Gas PRF = 0.227 mm N eff = 26.8 PRF = 0.147 mm N eff = 34.2
14
Yulan Li, Tsinghua Uni., TILC08, 3-6 March, 2008, Sendai, Japan x resolution – Ar:Iso:CF 4 =94:3:3 Gas PRF = 0.147 mm N eff = 38.5(36) PRF = 0.207 mm N eff = 23.2
15
Yulan Li, Tsinghua Uni., TILC08, 3-6 March, 2008, Sendai, Japan Pad response ~ Hodoscope Pad response @ z drift =0Diffusion in GEM detector What happens if the above two values are different? Theoretical: In analysis: If diffusion is too small, the hodoscope effect will be more obvious. We need defocus the electron in readout detector.
16
Yulan Li, Tsinghua Uni., TILC08, 3-6 March, 2008, Sendai, Japan Pad response ~ Hodoscope (cont.) PRF = 0.227 mm N eff = 26.8 PRF = 0.147 mm N eff = 34.2 Hodoscope effect more obvious
17
Yulan Li, Tsinghua Uni., TILC08, 3-6 March, 2008, Sendai, Japan Pad response ~ Hodoscope (cont.) PRF = 0.147 mm N eff = 38.5(36) PRF = 0.207 mm N eff = 23.2 Hodoscope effect more obvious
18
Yulan Li, Tsinghua Uni., TILC08, 3-6 March, 2008, Sendai, Japan N eff -Comparison TU-TPC result (B=1T) MP-TPC result (B=1T, Ar:Iso:CF 4 =94:3:3) Ref: http://www-hep.phys.saga-u.ac.jp/ILC-TPC
19
Yulan Li, Tsinghua Uni., TILC08, 3-6 March, 2008, Sendai, Japan Conclusion & Discussion TU-TPC studies @ KEK (B = 1T) shows: Resolution can be as good as 100 m @ Z ≈ 100 mm Measurement points fit the analytical formula very well The analytical formula was confirmed again Hodoscope effect ~ Pad response Help us to understand MPGD-TPC more deeply For C D : For P10, a little larger than the simulation values For Ar:Iso:CF 4, quite larger than simulation, same as MP@KEK test For N eff : More study are need ? N eff ~ V GEM, we are expecting larger N eff for larger V GEM
20
Yulan Li, Tsinghua Uni., TILC08, 3-6 March, 2008, Sendai, Japan Future Plan The prototype is setting up again in Tsinghua More studies will be given in a quieter condition But without magnetic field
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.