1. Peck: Transparent Distributed Backup Using Chirp Graduate Operating Systems, Fall 2005 Matthew Van Antwerp December 15, 2005

2. Outline ● Existing Methods ● Strengths and Weaknesses ● Chirp Overview ● Peck: Storage and Retrieval ● Mapfiles ● Conclusion

3. Existing Backup Methods ● Dedicated Backup Server ● Portable Media (CD, DVD, etc.) ● Freenet ● USB Thumbdrives ● Chirp

4. Strengths and Weaknesses

5. Chirp: Distributed Storage Pool at ND ● Composed mostly of department and lab computers - catalog listcatalog list ● Each system (about 200 in total) offers up spare hard drive space. ● Can be accessed through libchirp API, command line tools, or parrot. ● Peck sits on top of Chirp.

6. ` Peck Structure Peck libchirp chirp server chirp server chirp server

7. Peck Function ● Input file list ● Attempts upload and download of test file to each server to learn permissions ● Locates sufficient servers for upload ● Writes filename and server name to mapfile for each uploaded file ● Uploads copy of mapfile to multiple servers

8. Peck Mapfile ● Hypothetical: Your hard drive crashes and you lose all your data (yes, it will happen to you one day). ● Luckily you have been backing up your files via Peck. ● Peck scours the servers for your mapfile (relatively slow due to no knowledge of Chirp servers). ● When it finds a copy, it retrieves the file and opens it. ● One by one, Peck retrieves files listed in mapfile from the relevant servers.

9. Peck Mapfile Versions ● How do we know we are retrieving the proper mapfile when we upload new files or retrieve files? ● Also, how can we keep from filling up Chirp servers with redundant copies? ● Answer: through careful use of mapfiles. ● After first run of peck, we have a mapfile on the servers which we retrieve on next run. ● We check mapfile for a given filename when attempting to upload and update appropriately. ● Before uploading new mapfile, delete all old mapfiles.

10. Analysis ● Checking permissions: slow (18.15s avg) ● Upload: similar to ftp times ● Mapfile retrieval after total system loss: slow ● Download (after mapfile retrieved): similar to ftp times. ● Updating mapfile and removing old mapfiles: fairly slow. ● Very little overhead besides the obvious bottlenecks.

11. Conclusion ● Peck achieves many of the strengths of other backup methods while avoiding their weaknesses. ● Easy to use – simply give the application a list of files to upload (easily used in conjunction with file age scripts). An ideal cron job. ● Cheap (free), fairly efficient (although not largely scalable), easy to setup and maintain, and transparent. ● All necessary information for retrieval is stored on the Chirp servers.