Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAubrie Barton Modified over 8 years ago
1
Simulating the Light Distribution in Sodium Iodide Detectors Lisi Goodlett Dr. Ingo Wiedenh ö ver
2
STRIPSI Detector System Contains twenty-four sodium iodide detectors, in two concentric rings around the experiment.
3
Sodium Iodide Detectors Composed of a sodium iodide crystal Photomultiplier tubes affixed to each window Windows at either end Used to detect gamma rays
4
Current Method of Calibration Based on an exponential attenuation of light.
5
Data taken from a calibration run ● This data was analyzed using the previous formulas. ● Notice that the energy is not constant as one would expect. ● The current means for calibration do not completely describe the the behavior of the light in the detector.
6
Objective Computationally simulate the light distribution within the sodium iodide detector.
7
Basic Assumptions ● Attenuation of light can be described through intensity losses due to reflections within the cavity walls. ● About half of the scintillation photons produced propogate to either end of the crystal. ● Amount of light detected at either end can be calculated by varying the point of interaction and integrating over possible angles.
8
A few Uncertainties: ● Our detectors were given to us (third or fourth hand), and had been specially made. ● In consequence, we do not know all of the materials used to make the detectors.
9
The index of refraction for sodium iodide is n=1.8. In general, glass has a value of n=1.5. Critical angle: approx: 56 degrees
10
Results: ● Index of refraction of glass must be greater than 1.8. ● An ideal detector would transmit no light, assume a large value of n for coating. ● Tested many combinations of the two variables, graphing for each: ● Asymmetry vs. energy ● Position vs. asymmetry – Where asymmetry is defined as:
11
Graphs from data: Graphs from simulation:
12
● Increasing the values gives a closer approximation in the graph of energy vs. asymmetry, but leads to a far worse approximation in the graph of position vs. asymmetry.
13
What is causing this discrepancy? ● Possibility that coating on cavity walls is a type of titanium powder sometimes used in making detectors. ● How would this change a simulation? – Absorption and emission of photons.
14
Work in progress... ● I have since begun incorporating absorption into my current program. ● I will continue this work into the fall and hope to find my results improved.
16
Counting Reflections
17
Calculating for intensity loss
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.