Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Geodesy with Mars lander Network V. Dehant, J.-P. Barriot, and T. Van Hoolst Royal Observatory of Belgium Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Geodesy with Mars lander Network V. Dehant, J.-P. Barriot, and T. Van Hoolst Royal Observatory of Belgium Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées."— Presentation transcript:

1 Geodesy with Mars lander Network V. Dehant, J.-P. Barriot, and T. Van Hoolst Royal Observatory of Belgium Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées

2 Topics Rotation variations –Orientation in space: precession/nutation –Orientation in planet: polar motion –Rotation speed: length-of-day variations Gravity Field Modeling of –Interior of planets –Atmosphere dynamics  =  0 +  X ecliptic Y ecliptic Z ecliptic I = I 0 +  I Rotation Axis Precession-Nutation

3 Overview of the presentation Amplitudes of rotation variations of Mars Relation to interior structure and atmosphere of Mars Simulations of rotation variations and expected precisions (importance of landers) Gravity field: seasonal gravity variations

4 r : 230 m after 700 days  Moment of inertia of Mars ( C ) Precession of Mars

5

6 r : 15 m (main term: semi-annual) Precession and nutation of Mars

7

8 Nutation and interior structure Most important and geophysically interesting influence: existence of a liquid core Nutational motion of core differs from that of the mantle (if sphere: no core nutation). Core’s nutational effect : amplification of nutation with respect to rigid planet Main effect: resonance due to the existence of a free rotational mode related to the core

9 Free Core Nutation Rotation axis of the core Rotation axis of the mantle n close to resonant frequency: large core nutational motion in opposite direction of mantle nutation, which can then largely be amplified n Restoring forces depend on flattening of core Flattening mainly depends on core density FCN Period  core density, core radius ROB Relative rotation of axes Retrograde long period in space Close to main nutations

10 Amplification due to liquid core: 5mas or more

11 Variations of the rotation speed (  r : 10 m )

12 Polar motion (  r : 10 to over 100 cm)

13 Measuring Doppler shifts on Lander-Orbiter link ≈ Projection of relative velocity on line-of-sight Lander-Orbiter

14

15 days 7000 0 0 0 Error: centimeter level

16 Number of landers

17 Lander-Earth link

18 Graphes de resultats

19 Low degree zonal gravity coefficients and rotation rate Variations in C 20 give information about the CO 2 cycle. But strongly linked LOD (mass redistribution is main factor). Doppler shifts between landers – orbiter (LOD) and orbiter – Earth (C 20 ) Previous results assume a perfectly known orbit Numerical simulations with GINS (Géodésie par Intégrations Numériques Simultanées, CNES) software

20 Time-Varying Gravity Field C 20 C 30 The precision of current gravity observations are not sufficient enough to provide additional constrains to C0 2 cycle Gravity observation from SC, High Electron detector observation,GCM

21 Simulations with MGS (I=93°, e=0.01) & MEX (I=86°, e=0.6)

22 Simulations with two orbiters MGS (I=93°, e=0.01) +MEX (I=86°, e=0.6) The error is reduced by a factor of about 2 C40C50 C20C30

23 Effect of a Lander Network (single orbiter) Landers help to resolve the LOD, to determine better the orbit ascending node hence the even coefficients

24 Conclusions An additional lander – orbiter link improves the determination of rotation variations and gravity variations and makes it possible to extract information on Mars’ interior and atmosphere/polar caps CO 2 cycle

25 C DARGAUD v.dehant@oma.be ROB

26 Signature of MOPs Change in lander velocity due to MOP Geometric effect = change in direction lander-orbiter due to MOP Large effect for low altitude satellite |  V| : velocity différence between landers and orbiter (~3 km/s), |  V MOP | : change in |  V| due to (~ mm/s),  : angle between |  V| and line-of-sight lander-orbiter,   MOP : change in  due to MOP (~ 10 -7 rad).

27 Effect of the Landers-orbiter Doppler tracking on the J2 determination : model C 20 +: DSN, fixed ΔLOD but modified ----: DSN, fixed ΔLOD O: DSN + lander data

28 Landers-Orbiter Doppler tracking and seasonal gravity field : model C l0 o: near polar, DSN x: near polar DSN + lander tracking +: near polar + Starlette like orbiter, DSN tracking

29 Landers-Orbiter Doppler tracking and seasonal gravity field : Formal error o: near polar, DSN x: near polar DSN + lander tracking +: near polar + Starlette like orbiter, DSN tracking

30 Lander-Orbiter Doppler tracking and rotation rate determination Simulation of Mars’ Rotation rate determination From the Landers-orbiter Doppler-link (four landers and one near-polar orbiter).


Download ppt "Geodesy with Mars lander Network V. Dehant, J.-P. Barriot, and T. Van Hoolst Royal Observatory of Belgium Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google