1. MONTEREY COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION – EDUCATIONAL SERVICES - MONTEREY COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION MONTEREY COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION – EDUCATIONAL SERVICES - MONTEREY COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION – EDUCATIONAL IMPACT OF THE LCFF EVALUATION RUBRIC: CONSIDERATIONS WHEN DEVELOPING YOUR LCAP Superintendent’s Council Dr. Jamie Valenzuela-Mumau January 21, 2016

2. Mission The Monterey County Office of Education provides the leadership, support and service excellence needed to prepare the diverse students of Monterey County for success in each step of their educational journey. Vision Every student’s educational experience will prepare them for success as productive and contributing members of our global society. Core Values Accountability, Collaboration, Innovation Diversity & Equity

3. WHAT WE THOUGHT… LCAP rubric to provide feedback on high- leverage actions Focus was on content Tool to be used by districts and COEs to evaluate effectiveness And now….

4. LCAP State Priority Grouping Evaluation Rubrics Policy Statements Conditions for LearningAccess and Opportunity EngagementGraduation Pupil AchievementCollege and Career Readiness

6. STATE GRADUATION RATE ANALYSIS 2009-102010-112011-122012-132013-14 All Students74.7%77.1%78.9%80.4%81.0% Hispanic68.1%71.4%73.7%75.7%76.6% American Indian 67.3%68.5%72.4%72.8%70.6% Asian89.0%90.3%91.1%91.6%92.4% Pacific Islander72.3%74.9%77.0%78.4%80.4% Filipino87.4%89.9%90.8%91.6%92.2% African American 60.5%62.78%66.0%68.1%68.2% White83.5%85.7%86.6%87.7%87.6% Low Income68.0%71.1%73.0%74.8%75.6% English Learner56.4%61.5%62.0%63.1%65.4% Foster YouthN/A Student with Disability 56.7%59.5%61.1%61.9%62.3%

7. GRADUATION RATE STANDARD OPTION

8. Sample Unified School District 201420132012 3-Year Average Improvement All Students87%86%85%86%2% American Indian/Alaska Native 100%67%100%89%0% Asian96%95%93%95%3% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 80%67%100%82%-20% Filipino70%90%88%83%-18% Hispanic/Latino87%86%85%86%2% African American85%77%73%78%12% White86% 81%84%5% Two or More82%90%92%88%-10% EL78%74% 75%4% SED87%86%85%86%2% SWD70%68%66%68%4%

9. Improvement Outcome Very HighHighIntermediateLowVery Low Improved Significantly ExcellentGood Emerging Improved ExcellentGood EmergingIssue Maintained ExcellentGoodEmergingIssueConcern Declined GoodEmergingIssue Concern Declined Significantly EmergingIssue Concern

10. IMPACT FOR DISTRICTS Awareness level Potential considerations when deciding high-leverage actions within FY 2017 LCAP Potential considerations of WestEd’s “Best Practice” document related to Key Indicators

11. TIMELINE January-June –Feedback and continuation of key indicator charts July –Final reading to SBE September –Final approval by SBE October –Implementation

12. HOW TO PROVIDE FEEDBACK ACSA survey http://acsa.us8.list- manage.com/track/click?u=0ed07bebf845b4 591af89a358&id=6ec40cb089&e=6a45ee0d b5